leadership527
Posts: 5026
Joined: 6/2/2008 Status: offline
|
In general, all people have a certain responsibility for themselves. If they don't, they should be institutionalized, not seeking a master. But Carol's already GOT a Master. So then I suppose I have to decide if I need to institutionalize her or not? I think I'll let it ride for now but keep tabs on it. If the sub can't consent for any reason, whether it is physical or psychological, then you are not doing BDSM, you are doing rape. Technically you are right, but somehow I'm not thinking Carol would see it that way. Subs need to maintain their ability to consent beyond all other things. This includes the responsibility for refusing to consent - which means maintaining some limits. Wow, if only my world were so clear cut. But when you don't deal in consent and limits, then what? What if it's just down to dominance and submission... .my more forceful personality dominating her more submissive one? Carol does not have the responsibility to refuse consent (see the responsibility thread). I have the responsibility to take care of her. If you will quite literally do anything (and no one - despite the many lies - I have met actually is willing to do anything) then you are not consenting. Yeah yeah, but since we both agree that "do anything" is literally impossible then that really isn't much of a measure for evaluating human beings and their behaviors now, is it?
_____________________________
~Jeff I didn't so much "enslave" Carol as I did "enlove" her. - Me I want a joyous, loving, respectful relationship where the male is in charge and deserves to be. - DavanKael
|