FirmhandKY
Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
Original: rml "Clearly there was a tremendous amount of grass-roots energy building — a grass-roots prairie fire that was building in intensity," Law, now the Crossroads president, said in an interview. "We felt that one of the things we could do was pour gasoline on that." Now shall we talk about what Crossroads is and who they are funded by? No. In your mind, there seems to be no difference between: 1) a political organization deciding that they can make hay out of an issue, and then going and paying for professional "activists" and union members to protest at an event, or against a person, bused in from outside the district, to conduct a protest that would not otherwise exist. Such a protest would never have existed without the funding and the planning of the political organization. 2) a political organization that sees a rising tide of discontent and local protests, by people who have rarely if ever been politically energized, and whose desires for change mirrors many of their own concerns, and decide to assist by funding. The protests, and the discontent existed before the decision to support it and fund it. One is an "astro-turf" and you buddy Rahm is an acknowledged master of it. The other is a "grassroots" movement, that has gained traction and support, and may turn into an organization, or organizations with a permanent political impact. You see the difference? Firm
< Message edited by FirmhandKY -- 10/28/2010 3:09:05 PM >
_____________________________
Some people are just idiots.
|