Madame4a
Posts: 2045
Joined: 2/4/2008 From: Washington, DC area Status: offline
|
Topping? Not in my world or relationship... so, as usual, it depends... and no of course that's not what dominance is all about.. but for me, it is a dominant thing in some circumstances. Its always about context.. as a Femme Leather Dyke.. I can tell you its an art, as I like to be fucked.. its important to find a boi who can keep the right head space.. luckily my boi can do that.. she's a wonder.. but when I fist her or I use her anally... its about my dominance. quote:
ORIGINAL: ReginaMirus quote:
ORIGINAL: Madame4a Hmmm... I have the feeling that you haven't found the right partner.. or it just isn't for you.. but I personally benefit from that sort of activity... what a marvelous way to exert dominance... among several other billion things it can do... Really? That's really what dominance is all about? Wouldn't that be better defined as TOPPING? FTR, I'm honestly not opposed to anal play at all. I just have a problem with somehow tying it to dominance/submission, period...the implication being the penetrated always =submissive, the penetrator always =dominant. It still reinforces a patriarchal theme, and I for one am not a fan of perpetuating that myth. Fuck. If this were true, then I could never enjoy PIV sex again, because the act itself would somehow be reducing my dominance by default.
_____________________________
You're crazy bitch But you f*ck so good, I'm on top of it When I dream, I'm doing you all night Scratches all down my back to keep me right on
|