petslave2b -> RE: What do you think of Aetheists? (11/18/2010 1:44:14 PM)
|
"Please show me where precisely, in the quotes you cited, I am saying anything whatsoever about relying on our private experience for a scientifically accurate picture of the objective "world around us," " Kirata, You asked the question "Would you be willing to consider your own personal direct experience to be evidence?". I merely pointed out that our personal direct experience is not always reliable and that is why there are constraints on what qualifies as evidence. "Personally, I don't see a correlation between atheism and imagination" CallaFirestormBW, Except religion requires a complete lack of imagination. "It's a matter of record that God prefers donkeys." I dunno, Thor had a cariot, probably had horses for that. Hindus have all kinds of rides. "But as to atheists, why should I have any thoughts towards or against them, for me, they hold the same space as the believers in that they chosen not to believe where the believers have chosen to believe." Atheists do not to believe in gods for the same reason any sane adult does not believe in santa. Atheists and believers do not occupy the same space, more like opposites. "But to err on the side of atheists, I don't know because I am not an atheist, but perhaps they can see our future has taken root in the past so to speak,belief has lead to too much bloodshed in our past and is continuing in our present and will be the future if we don't get a grip. " Yes, religion is the easiest way to get people to commit atrocities, but that is not why atheists do not believe in gods. Atheists do not believe in gods because all gods are simplistic, not devine. They are all created out of our fear, ignorance and desire, to satisfy our psychological needs. Quite simply, no god is believable. "And that is it, isn't it, Harley says something that lasts, an unstressed lazy motor that just keeps on going, whereas high revving low capacity motors wear out fast and undoubtedly just add to the pollution problems due to the rapid rate of wear. But the Japanese and now Far Eastern ideal, make it fast, make it cheap and make it so it has a finite lifespan to ensure future sales. Not very ecological in the process, yet more examples of a wasteful society. But what is the way forward for Jap crap and Harley are perfect examples of two ideals, the wasteful society and the make it last society" All donorcycles end up the same way, so who cares if the donor rides a Harley or not? But when it comes to quality, reliability and effeciency, only an American would buy American over Japanese. Japan has a reputation for quality, reliability and efficiency that America could only dream about. As for wasteful societies, America leads the world in that department. Harley's have an image, and the type of noise that gives the attention some people crave.
|
|
|
|