RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


PeonForHer -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/2/2010 5:07:56 PM)

 . . . And anyway, you should be getting all the sleep you can so that you're ready for the next big round of battles with HMG over the cuts. 






VaguelyCurious -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/2/2010 5:13:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

 . . . And anyway, you should be getting all the sleep you can so that you're ready for the next big round of battles with HMG over the cuts. 

Not a student, lovely one... :P




PeonForHer -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/2/2010 5:13:43 PM)

And btw, first chance you get, could you vote to get rid of Aaron Porter, the NUS president?  He's a lily-livered, Blairite twat.  There's no place for farts like him leading the students anymore.  Thank you.  Back to the topic at hand.




PeonForHer -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/2/2010 5:15:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious
Not a student, lovely one... :P


I know - but you will be next year, won't you?  (And it still makes me laugh when I see that sticking-tongue-out-of-side-of-mouth thing.)




Zevar -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/2/2010 5:23:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Atropos19

Quoting this from another thread:

"I find it interesting that male domination brings with it - more often than not - the expectation of growth, protection and nurture while femdom is almost exclusively about exploitation, denigration and humiliation."

Is this true?  What does everyone think of this?


In my experience I have only discovered generalizations to incite a defensive reply. I for one, have no vested interest in replying in such a manner. I understand that some folks might find what you have proposed to be offensive, while some might not. Regarless how anyone views your question, I suggest you reconsider this notion as it is totally without any validity.

Obviously individuality contributes significantly when considering gender differences and orientation and the like. Some will propose that gender is solely binary, therefore any expression of mutability in others who do not express in a binary fixed manner are usually marginalized by society in the first instance. Others express differently and to attempt to find a way to fence them in is altogether futile, at best.

However to consider due to gender there are differences that are prone toward one proclivity while another gender is prone toward the opposite in all instances is without substantial evidence to support such a proposition. Your question serves to merely incite personal opinions from individuals whom clearly have every right to disagree with such foolish ideologies. When all is said and done, you will have to arrive at your own opinion. Clearly, you might want to objectively consider the generalization you presented and quoted from another individual, independently from others opinions to arrive at your own perspective.

Do some research next time before you present such foolish notions based on gender. Hot coals have been know to singe the hand who tries to handle them without preventative knowledge. Finally, if there was or is a point or rather a purpose for you asking this marginalizing question, I have yet to determine a reason for such cutting remarks about those whom you clearly know nothing about OR rather neither does whomever stated this utter nonsense to begin with.

Take care!




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/2/2010 5:30:16 PM)

I <3. Zevar!

VC, good point--if it was the middle of the night, arguing with jackwagons might bemore entertaining!




Twoshoes -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/2/2010 5:31:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious
Not a student, lovely one... :P


Wait, I always thought you were a student. Strange. Very strange. Very unexpectedly strange.




VaguelyCurious -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/2/2010 5:33:43 PM)

Not currently. Long story :-)




PeonForHer -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/2/2010 5:35:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Twoshoes

Wait, I always thought you were a student. Strange. Very strange. Very unexpectedly strange.


She's a full-time, professional, dangerous anarchist these days, Twoshoes.  She has the subversive hairstyle and glasses to prove it.




VaguelyCurious -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/2/2010 5:37:14 PM)

Ok, last hijack post, I promise, but:

Subversive GLASSES?!?

Wtf are you saying is wrong with my glasses?




Twoshoes -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/2/2010 5:54:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Twoshoes

Wait, I always thought you were a student. Strange. Very strange. Very unexpectedly strange.


She's a full-time, professional, dangerous anarchist these days, Twoshoes.  She has the subversive hairstyle and glasses to prove it.


I had an anarchist economy teacher for two years and I briefly considered myself an anarchist, as well. [;)]

I had shoulder-length hair, no documents and no bank accounts for a while just to prove it. For real (like not for fake).

I like this adjective, "subversive"; I'm going to work it into something, somewhere...




PeonForHer -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/2/2010 5:59:34 PM)

The standard dangerous-anarchist look, for hundreds of years, has been an odd hairstyle and glasses, hon.  Google Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, one of the earliest anarchist thinkers.  Though you probably couldn't manage the requisite beard, you'll see what I mean. 




LPslittleclip -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/2/2010 7:48:12 PM)

my life with my Mistress is based on growth and betterment of A/all in O/our poly family. now i wont get into a battle of wits with the op as it appears as he is unarmed




PeonForHer -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/2/2010 8:03:09 PM)

How are you, Mr Clip?  Are you on a break at the moment?  It's good to see you.




PeonForHer -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/2/2010 8:05:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Twoshoes
I like this adjective, "subversive"; I'm going to work it into something, somewhere...


It's a great word and a great idea, 2.  It's just fun to worry the 'normals', that's all. [;)]




Awareness -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/3/2010 4:09:56 AM)

   FR.

  Speculative ranting seems to be the order of the day.  In essence, when questioned about the impression that comes across, the response is an hysterically defensive reversion to ad-hominem anti-logic.  Far from being dominants living in their own sense of reality, some appear to be insecure posers unable to cope with any response which doesn't approximate the self-worship they're apparently addicted to.

I have seen one single response from a Domme which impressed me with its clear level-headed sense of strength and reason - and that came from Lockit.  I noted this in particular:
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit
I am a dominant woman and I don't need to humiliate or steal my dominant stance in life from someone by beating them down. I am what I am and don't need to weaken another to be what I am.
  This is in marked contrast to what I've seen expressed in profiles, journals, conversations between Dommes on these boards and pseudo-professional (the distinction is sometimes unclear) Dommes locally.

That is, the subjugation of someone powerful is part of what provides these Dommes with their sense of self.

My remark was an aside in a separate discussion.  Responses can range from purely positing that I'm an asshole - in which case, who gives a fuck what I think - to simply thinking I'm ignorant.  Yet this thread is witness to those who have internalised what I said as a criticism of their deepest selves and subsequently reacted in the most defensive fashion.  Those with the greatest sense of self have not.  Some of you apparently still have further to go.

For the most part, I tend to ignore the hangers-on and instinctive yet witless defenders who speculate about my motives, intelligence or experience.  I didn't start a thread attacking Dommes as a group, I made a comment based upon observation.  If you're unable to cope with the idea that people will form independent opinions based upon observation, then you always have the option of sitting quietly in the corner while the adults do the talking.




RedMagic1 -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/3/2010 4:19:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness
I made a comment based upon observation. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking_%28fallacy%29




LadyPact -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/3/2010 5:09:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

  FR.

  Speculative ranting seems to be the order of the day.  In essence, when questioned about the impression that comes across, the response is an hysterically defensive reversion to ad-hominem anti-logic.  Far from being dominants living in their own sense of reality, some appear to be insecure posers unable to cope with any response which doesn't approximate the self-worship they're apparently addicted to.

I have seen one single response from a Domme which impressed me with its clear level-headed sense of strength and reason - and that came from Lockit.  I noted this in particular:
This is in marked contrast to what I've seen expressed in profiles, journals, conversations between Dommes on these boards and pseudo-professional (the distinction is sometimes unclear) Dommes locally.

That is, the subjugation of someone powerful is part of what provides these Dommes with their sense of self.

My remark was an aside in a separate discussion.  Responses can range from purely positing that I'm an asshole - in which case, who gives a fuck what I think - to simply thinking I'm ignorant.  Yet this thread is witness to those who have internalised what I said as a criticism of their deepest selves and subsequently reacted in the most defensive fashion.  Those with the greatest sense of self have not.  Some of you apparently still have further to go.

For the most part, I tend to ignore the hangers-on and instinctive yet witless defenders who speculate about my motives, intelligence or experience.  I didn't start a thread attacking Dommes as a group, I made a comment based upon observation.  If you're unable to cope with the idea that people will form independent opinions based upon observation, then you always have the option of sitting quietly in the corner while the adults do the talking.


It has more to do with a much simpler premise.  Since your impression has been gained by things you have read on the internet, it stands to reason that people will believe the nonsense that is typed up on the internet.  Very much in the same fashion that, if I went through various articles on the net that I couldn't verify, drew conclusions about groups of people that I had no basis in fact concerning the way they live, and started repeating it as the truth.  How much of a link there is between the original comment in another thread and what it led the OP of this thread to actually believe, I couldn't say.  It's always better to stop the cycle in correcting what isn't accurate.

If I were to look at the sky at sunset for five minutes and come away with the impression that the sky was orange most of the time during the day (because I only had limited exposure), I would actually want people who had observed the sky to tell Me that, for the majority of the time, the sky was blue.  It would really be Me who had more learning to do, rather than the other way around.  That little sliver of time that I was basing an incorrect assumption on really isn't much if I were looking at the whole picture.

Basing your opinion on what you see in profiles and journals, just really isn't good data.  You don't know the people who wrote them or even if they were really written by women.  It's just the old adage of not believing everything you read.




CeriseNin -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/3/2010 5:36:48 AM)

Completely disagree. I've served both men and women, and IRL, both sexes were into the dynamic - - me as a person first.




crazyml -> RE: Difference btw Male/Female Doms... (12/3/2010 6:18:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zevar

Do some research next time before you present such foolish notions based on gender.




Zevar, did you actually read the op before rushing to such a judgement? The guy was asking a question. He was doing his research. Given the high standards you set when it comes to politeness, I think you owe the OP an apology.

To the OP..

I'm going to buck the trend and say that I think this is a really good question, and it's worth exploring. I'll start by saying that I had exactly the same instant reaction to the proposition - on the face of it it's a silly generalisation that deserves a good caning.

But, there's a but.

Firstly, I don't think it's anything like as stupid a generalisation as the whining "All Dommes are out to screw you..." nonsense rocks up here on an all-too-regular basis.

Secondly, yes - if you look at the "Personals" side of CM, I don't think it would be unreasonable to conclude that there was some element of truth to the statement. But as Elisabella points out -


quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella
there is much higher percentage of scam artists and professional Dommes on the internet than there would be at a munch.


I'd also say that I agree with this too...

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella
Most of the humiliation/degradation/forced fem posts are by male subs. Not all, of course, but easily the majority.


So the first observation is... why has the response on this thread been so derisive? I think that it may be (Note how I say "may" - I really don't want to be in receipt of a response containing medieval-style telling off combined with heinous and wanton butchery of grammar from any of the regulars!) that you're more likely to encounter people (note "more likely" not "always") who are more actively engaged in kink, do it in real-life more often, and invest time and effort in understanding it, than you are on the general personals section.

That isn't to say that the personals section is just full of wannabees and fakers, but I do reckon that it has a higher proportion of them than here on the boards. So I'd say that you have to moderate any conclusions you draw from the personals section on the basis that there are a lot of fantasists out there.

Next... I think that while I agree with the lovely jujubeeMB when she says -

quote:

ORIGINAL: jujubeeMB

No. It is not "natural" for a woman to be submissive. And no, it's not natural for a man to be dominant. People are unique and their genders say nothing about their inherent dominance or submission.


I think that there is a stereotype (no matter how dated or silly) that suggests that men are expected to be more "dominant" and women more "nurturing", and while I won't offer a detailed statistical analysis - I do get the impression that there are lots of Male-Sub personals that talk about a desire for humiliation.

I've just done a very quick (and unscientific) search and out of the first 10 malesub profiles - we had

- Looking for a nurturing reln 2
- Looking for humiliation (diapers, w/s etc) - 3
- Looking for Feminisation - 3

It doesn't seem all that silly that some male subs would regard things like humiliation/feminisation at the hands of a Domme as a deeply humiliating thing given the stereotype. I stress - I don't think it's a valid stereotype, but I do think that it motivates some male subs. So it seems fairly natural that that "demand" would create opportunities for people to create Domme profiles that cater for that demand.

Meanwhile, here on the boards you'll see tons (and tons and tons) of evidence to suggest that most dominants of either gender who are looking for a long term relationship would regard growth, protection and nurturing as a really important part of the equation. Out in "personals land" - if you do a bit of scoping you'll find plenty of Dom profiles that major on exploitation, denigration and humiliation and plenty of Domme profiles that major on growth, protection and nurture.


So... rather than blathering on... I think that general statement :-

"I find it interesting that male domination brings with it - more often than not - the expectation of growth, protection and nurture while femdom is almost exclusively about exploitation, denigration and humiliation."

is basically nonsense, but there are some interesting discussions to be had around what motivate male subs to look for humiliation/exploitation vs what motivates those Fem Subs that look for the same and conversely what motivates Doms to look for a relationship vs Growth/protection and nurturing vs what motivates those Dommes that look for the same.

[With apologies in advance for the incoherence - Am v jet lagged]

[ED for the two typos I found]












Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125