Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/24/2010 7:01:05 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: VioletGray

They already know there are gays in the shower with him.



Under DADT? Really? Share this with us, please. How does one spot a gay person?

K.



So what exactly are you saying here?

In your earlier post you claimed that it was a valid question because people are concerned that heterosexuals will have to shower with homosexuals.

Except they already do, but that's okay because they don't know it?

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/24/2010 7:12:56 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

So what exactly are you saying here?

In your earlier post you claimed that it was a valid question because people are concerned that heterosexuals will have to shower with homosexuals.

Except they already do, but that's okay because they don't know it?

Try to focus on the words. Remember now, only the words you actually see. Ready?

It was claimed "they already know." I asked how.

THE END

Got it? Very good!

Now go find somebody else to play "Hallucination" with.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 12/24/2010 7:16:40 AM >

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/24/2010 8:44:28 AM   
Marc2b


Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline
I don’t see what the big deal is. This is America and we have a thing here called freedom of speech. A reporter, or any person for that matter, may ask Barney Frank anything they damn well please and he is free to respond or not. Personally, I think he handled the question well – not overly mocking but just mocking enough while pointing out flaws in the question’s premise. I would also remind people that one of the beautiful things about freedom of speech is that it makes it easier to spot the assholes. So let freedom ring… and let people speak up!

As for Barney Frank himself, he’s had enough political shenanigans to be disliked as a typical politician, his sexuality really isn’t an issue.

The DADT issue does touch upon a thorny fact: Men and women have separate showers mostly because we have been raised to believe that it is wrong for the opposite sex – except for specific circumstances (spouses/lovers/doctors) – to see each other naked. The great fear of the moralists, of course, was that “sinful” passions might be aroused – and there is some truth to that. The arousal part, not the “sinful” part. I know that if a beautiful young woman was taking a shower next to me, my pecker would let me (and everyone else in view) know that it was ready, willing and able to perform its duty… which would be kind of embarrassing even though it is perfectly normal and natural.

Truth be told I think that most women and more than a few men would be uncomfortable with co-ed showers because they are uncomfortable with being gawked at sexually and there is an analogy to homosexuals and heterosexuals showering together. VioletGray is quite right that the abolition of DADT is unlikely to result in a sudden upsurge of gay soldiers sexually assaulting their comrades in the showers (and if one did, the military has its own court system to deal with such violations) but knowing that Private Johnson is gay and that you're his type might still be enough to make some people feel awkward and uncomfortable in such situations. So what do we do about people who are uncomfortable showering in the presence of gay people? Barney Frank nailed it: We let them make their own choices. If you don’t want to shower with gay people then don’t join the military or the local gym and don’t live in the dorm at college. You make your choices and then accept the consequences that flow from those choices.


_____________________________

Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/24/2010 9:31:14 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Try to focus on the words. Remember now, only the words you actually see. Ready?

It was claimed "they already know." I asked how.

THE END

Got it? Very good!

Now go find somebody else to play "Hallucination" with.

K.



Well Kirata, as long as we want to play semantics and focus on absolute definitions let's take a look at some of your words:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

What the tape shows is a guy asking Frank a question about a part of the policy that apparently troubles some people. Period. I think Frank gave him a good answer, but his insinuations about the guy's motives were uncalled for. Talk about commenting on what the tape shows...

A conservative reporter from right-leaning CNS News thought he would play gotcha journalist and ask gay Congressman Barney Frank about gay and straight soldiers showering together. Big mistake. Huge. Barney totally eviscerates the guy and exposes him as a fool...

That's just a fucking hallucination, replete with imaginary mind-reading abilities. The only thing Frank "exposed" was his inability to handle a question without getting defensive.

K.



Let's start with the first sentence.

Who are the "some people" that are troubled by it and exactly why are they troubled?  More importantly, since you like to ask these types of questions, how do you know they are troubled?

Is it because you have heard news reports?  Talked to people?  Hey, guess what, that's exactly how she can claim many already know.

Second, as long as we are on the subject of words, how does Barney Frank both give "a good answer" and have an "inability to answer a question without getting defensive" at the same time?  Wouldn't getting defensive imply it was not a good answer?

But let's move on.  You state that Frank's insinuations were uncalled for.  What exactly did he insinuate?  He bluntly stated his answers, that's not insinuation.

This reporter that you define as just a guy asking Frank a question is from CNS, originally called the Conservative News Service, funded by the ultra-conservative Media Research Council.  You know, that wonderful group of people who decide any view they disagree with is liberal media bias.

So let's not try to pretend that a reporter from a news service that caters to those who opposed DADT's repeal was just asking an innocent question of an openly gay Congressman. 

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/24/2010 2:39:03 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
I find it funny the cons didn't like the way Frank destroyed that no nothing reporter from the ultra con website. I find it especially funny considering the fact that this last election cycle many conservative politicians flat out refused to even talk to media outside of the far right sphere.

If the right thinks the questions they're being asked by CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSN, NYT etc. etc. are so completely ridiculous then why don't they exercise their (half?) wit and respond like Frank did here? Is it because they know that their answers would either be laughably naive and misinformed or reminiscent of a certain miss Teen USA contestant from South Carolina?

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/24/2010 10:40:00 PM   
VioletGray


Posts: 359
Joined: 10/29/2007
From: Baltimore, MD
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: VioletGray

So why bring it up? Because there are straight people that feel icky about it, and he wanted to try to make Mr. Frank answer for why straight people should have to feel icky.

Another mind-reader.

quote:

ORIGINAL: VioletGray

Besides, those people who have that concern are.. hm.. what's a good word.. I was going to say "are stupid, so who cares what they think" but...

You were "going to say... but," eh?

quote:

ORIGINAL: VioletGray

They already know there are gays in the shower with him.

Under DADT? Really? Share this with us, please. How does one spot a gay person?

K.





1.) No one's claiming to read minds. This is just my personal judgement call, based on what I've seen.

2.) Yup. "STUPID!" was a gut reaction, but who's ever been convinced that way?

3.) Are you seriously asking this question? Lol They don't need to spot them! over a thousand have been kicked out of the military already! Do you think they got all of them? We wouldn't even be talking about this otherwise!

#3 made my brain hurt. just.. ow...

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/24/2010 11:03:27 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

I don’t see what the big deal is. This is America and we have a thing here called freedom of speech. A reporter, or any person for that matter, may ask Barney Frank anything they damn well please and he is free to respond or not. Personally, I think he handled the question well – not overly mocking but just mocking enough while pointing out flaws in the question’s premise. I would also remind people that one of the beautiful things about freedom of speech is that it makes it easier to spot the assholes. So let freedom ring… and let people speak up!

On this we agree. 

quote:

As for Barney Frank himself, he’s had enough political shenanigans to be disliked as a typical politician, his sexuality really isn’t an issue.

While it's rare for Me to make contributions in this section, any time I that I do so, I attempt to keep to the subject at hand.  I'm not looking at Frank's entire political career.  I'm looking at the interview on one subject.

quote:

The DADT issue does touch upon a thorny fact: Men and women have separate showers mostly because we have been raised to believe that it is wrong for the opposite sex – except for specific circumstances (spouses/lovers/doctors) – to see each other naked. The great fear of the moralists, of course, was that “sinful” passions might be aroused – and there is some truth to that. The arousal part, not the “sinful” part. I know that if a beautiful young woman was taking a shower next to me, my pecker would let me (and everyone else in view) know that it was ready, willing and able to perform its duty… which would be kind of embarrassing even though it is perfectly normal and natural.

Truth be told I think that most women and more than a few men would be uncomfortable with co-ed showers because they are uncomfortable with being gawked at sexually and there is an analogy to homosexuals and heterosexuals showering together. VioletGray is quite right that the abolition of DADT is unlikely to result in a sudden upsurge of gay soldiers sexually assaulting their comrades in the showers (and if one did, the military has its own court system to deal with such violations) but knowing that Private Johnson is gay and that you're his type might still be enough to make some people feel awkward and uncomfortable in such situations. So what do we do about people who are uncomfortable showering in the presence of gay people? Barney Frank nailed it: We let them make their own choices. If you don’t want to shower with gay people then don’t join the military or the local gym and don’t live in the dorm at college. You make your choices and then accept the consequences that flow from those choices.


In this, I think you are skipping something.  My belief is that there is an additional vulnerability in the case of women and men and gay men and straight men in the same circumstances.  We know that acts of sexual assault against women have little to do with sexual acts themselves.  It's about violence.  In the case of men and women with equal defensive training, such acts of violence can be easier to commit.  Not especially the same case when we are talking about people of the same gender.  Let's not forget the spikes that were experienced in reports by women who were being sexually assaulted when women were integrated into certain areas.  That's a little more than feeling awkward.

As sad as I am to say it, I do believe there will be an increase in violence as gays are open in their service.  Actually, I don't really think every homosexual is going to feel free to announce their orientation as soon as DADT is abolished.  Some will be so glad not to be living a life of secrecy that they will do it right away and others are going to sit back and wait. 

This violence won't be instigated by gays.  It's going to be by those straight folks who are similar to the guys who used to roll guys in the park or outside of clubs.  There are going to be a few high profile cases, the military will administer the strictest punishments (which, keep in mind, is not prevention) so that the culture will change.

As a military wife, I see these things coming.  I'm not proud of them, but I know this is a possibility.  


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to Marc2b)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/24/2010 11:29:38 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline
Oh alright, one more game. But then you need to take your nap.

I did not say that some people are troubled by it. I said, apparently it troubles some people. See the word "apparently" in there? Good fellow, now you're concentrating!

I don't actually think showers are the issue at all, though it is being given the appearance that that's the case. I stated who (and implicitly, what) I think is behind this non-issue here. See how easy it is when you read a thread before posting?

Now, these next two will be a little harder for you. Behaving "defensively" is a matter of style and delivery, not content. You have to remember that we're speaking English. So when Frank asks the reporter, "What do you think is wrong with people showering with homosexuals?" he is insinuating that the reporter thinks something is wrong with it. See? Just remember, it's English.

And finally, of course, I don't know what that reporter's personal views on this particular issue are, and you don't know what they are either. So you really mustn't pretend that you do, okay? It's not healthy for you, and it annoys people who can think.

Now, warm milk first?

K.






< Message edited by Kirata -- 12/25/2010 12:19:28 AM >

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/24/2010 11:53:41 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: VioletGray

3.) Are you seriously asking this question?

Yes. You said straights already know there are gays in the shower with them. I asked how do they know this. They know there are gays in military, of course (according to Gallup, The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force estimates that three to eight percent of both sexes are either homosexual or bisexual). But how do they know there is one in the shower with them? Is there some way to tell? Answer: No.

I'm not arguing against repealing DADT. I'm just saying that "they already know" is a specious argument.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 12/25/2010 12:49:58 AM >

(in reply to VioletGray)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/24/2010 11:55:20 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
Wouldn't law of averages apply, Kirata?

_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/25/2010 12:10:25 AM   
VioletGray


Posts: 359
Joined: 10/29/2007
From: Baltimore, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: VioletGray

3.) Are you seriously asking this question?

Yes. You said straights already know there are gays in the shower with them. I asked how do they know this. They know there are gays in military, of course (according to Gallup, The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force estimates that three to eight percent of both sexes are either homosexual or bisexual). But how do they know there is one in the shower with them? Is there some way to tell? Answer: No.

I'm not arguing against repealing DADT. I'm just saying that "they already know" is a specious argument.

K.




O.k... if all military men shower, and there are gays in the military, then.. you see where I'm going with this.

I think that within the context my argument is valid. I think we're talking using two different scales here. The question "How does one spot a gay person" is using a smaller context, whereas I, and those who are speaking for and against DADT in the political arena, are speaking in broader terms.

< Message edited by VioletGray -- 12/25/2010 12:15:30 AM >

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/25/2010 12:16:32 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

Wouldn't law of averages apply, Kirata?

Sure, but you can't treat abstract knowlege and particular knowledge as if they were the same thing. There is a difference between knowing in an abstract sense that anybody might be gay, and knowing that someone in particular is. For example, the law of averages says that at least some of the women with whom I come into contact every day would fuck me if I approached them. But I don't know which ones!

K.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/25/2010 12:42:33 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: VioletGray

O.k... if all military men shower, and there are gays in the military, then.. you see where I'm going with this.

I think we're talking using two different scales here.


Yes, that works as a way of putting it. Service people "already know" there are gays in the military (and that they take showers). But no service person knows if there is a gay in this shower, right here, right now. So a problem arises when someone responds to an issue at one scale with an answer that is only true at a different scale.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 12/25/2010 12:49:14 AM >

(in reply to VioletGray)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/25/2010 11:18:44 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Barney was in love with Fanny and Freddie. I think he liked Freddie the best..


I think he liked Freddie's fanny the best.


_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/26/2010 3:42:13 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

As sad as I am to say it, I do believe there will be an increase in violence as gays are open in their service.


I'm sitting here trying to think about why you would believe this.

The Pentagon's study found the majority accepting of serving alongside gays.


Study: Little Risk in Ending Ban on Gays 

A summary of the report says 69 percent of respondents think they have already served alongside gay people.


Of those who thought that, 92 percent said their units were able to work together and 8 percent said the units functioned poorly as a result.

"We have a gay guy. He's big, he's mean and he kills lots of bad guys. No one cared that he was gay," the report quotes a member of the special operations force as saying.

quote:


Actually, I don't really think every homosexual is going to feel free to announce their orientation as soon as DADT is abolished.  Some will be so glad not to be living a life of secrecy that they will do it right away and others are going to sit back and wait.  


The point is they now have the choice. 

This isn't likely to promote anyone announcing their orientation.

What it does is remove the fear of being "outed" and eliminate the repercussions from those who would have come out regardless.





(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/26/2010 4:27:46 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Oh alright, one more game. But then you need to take your nap.

I did not say that some people are troubled by it. I said, apparently it troubles some people. See the word "apparently" in there? Good fellow, now you're concentrating!

I don't actually think showers are the issue at all, though it is being given the appearance that that's the case. I stated who (and implicitly, what) I think is behind this non-issue here. See how easy it is when you read a thread before posting?

Now, these next two will be a little harder for you. Behaving "defensively" is a matter of style and delivery, not content. You have to remember that we're speaking English. So when Frank asks the reporter, "What do you think is wrong with people showering with homosexuals?" he is insinuating that the reporter thinks something is wrong with it. See? Just remember, it's English.

And finally, of course, I don't know what that reporter's personal views on this particular issue are, and you don't know what they are either. So you really mustn't pretend that you do, okay? It's not healthy for you, and it annoys people who can think.

Now, warm milk first?



Kirata, you crack me up.

You complain about Barney Frank being defensive when you are the most defensive poster on this board.  You expect everything you say to be accepted and when someone disagrees or challenges your statements you perceive it as a personal insult and become testy.  And this isn't the first time I've said this to you.

Maybe this just isn't healthy for you.  You might not have the temperament to be arguing on a political board.   I wouldn't want to see what is apparently your already soaring blood pressure cause you to stroke out.

But you did say one thing of value, though you interpreted it in your usual backward fashion.  Rather than focusing on style and delivery,  maybe you should focus on content. 

But thank you for another wonderful lesson Mr. Literal. 

You must be loads of fun to hang out with.  I'm sure if someone offhandedly said the sky is really blue today you would launch into a long, boring discourse about gas molecules and light scattering.

Mr. Literal Video 



(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/26/2010 4:36:48 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
I base it on a few things, rule.

I tend to put a bit more weight in things I've overheard people say, rather than the way they respond during an official survey.

It's My personal belief that, just like any large group of people, you're going to have some bad examples.

I've had too many occasions of having to hear of some of the stupid things that some folks in the military will do.  A number of them aren't pretty.

No, it's not the majority, but when I know there are still issues of racism and sexism that lead to violence, I can't believe this is going to be any different.


ETA - I really hope I am wrong though.


< Message edited by LadyPact -- 12/26/2010 4:37:44 PM >


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/26/2010 5:27:44 PM   
Aynne88


Posts: 3873
Joined: 8/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Barney was in love with Fanny and Freddie. I think he liked Freddie the best..


I think he liked Freddie's fanny the best.



Yes he is openly gay and engages in anal sex with men. Done now willbeur? Did your little funny impress your sockpuppets? Are you going to come apart because you are just realizing that gay men exist? You aren't single by any chance are you? Can't imagine why...


_____________________________

As long as people will shed the blood of innocent creatures there can be no peace, no liberty, no harmony between people. Slaughter and justice cannot dwell together.
—Isaac Bashevis Singer, writer and Nobel laureate (1902–1991)



(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/26/2010 8:18:19 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Barney was in love with Fanny and Freddie. I think he liked Freddie the best..


I think he liked Freddie's fanny the best.



Yes he is openly gay and engages in anal sex with men. Done now willbeur? Did your little funny impress your sockpuppets? Are you going to come apart because you are just realizing that gay men exist? You aren't single by any chance are you? Can't imagine why...



Ill be done when I want to be done.
Dont have any sockpuppets.
I have no problem with gay men or women.
No, Im not single.

Done ranting? Take a deep breath and grow a sense of humor.

< Message edited by willbeurdaddy -- 12/26/2010 8:19:00 PM >


_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to Aynne88)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut - 12/26/2010 9:45:37 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

You must be loads of fun to hang out with.

For some people, yeah... for others, fortunately not.

For example, I don't appreciate people who think the "real" meaning of what I posted is something I didn't say. And if even after I blow them off they continue to press me (e.g., with illiterate questions presumably intended to demonstrate the sharp intelligence and perceptiveness behind their comments) it can sometimes become just too amusing to resist smacking them. I suppose that's why people who read something into a thing that isn't there are the butt of so many jokes.

Mister Obvious

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 12/26/2010 9:54:46 PM >

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Barney Frank De-Balls A Wingnut Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094