TreasureKY
Posts: 3032
Joined: 4/10/2007 From: Kentucky Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze Sorry, makes no sense. A criminal will always be a criminal and I wouldn't put trust in them, the only difference is, can he be an even more dangerous criminal by having firearms easily available? Currently it's not easy to purchase or own a gun legally in most parts of Europe, there have been more illegal guns around due to the downfall of the former Eastern Block, the most hardened criminals will possibly have guns, but by making it easy for everybody, even the relatively harmless criminals like small time burglars might start carrying them, and that would make it far more risky, I think. You have to take into consideration that most European countries never had guns readily available, I understand that it's different in the US because there are so many guns around and also in hands where they shouldn't be, that for some people carrying or owning one is protection. What would happen here would be that the amount of accidents and armed robberies would increase dramatically if we'd introduce the same laws. Whether it makes sense to you or not, the question is what actually works... quote:
... It means there are over 2,000 crimes recorded per 100,000 population in the UK, making it the most violent place in Europe. ... By comparison, America has an estimated rate of 466 violent crimes per 100,000 population. While legalizing guns would put weapons in more criminal's hands, those same criminals would quickly find out what it is like to look down the barrel belonging to their would-be victim... and their victim's neighbor next door... and the neighbor across the way... and any good Samaritan just passing by. Seems to me that a lot of those "borderline" criminals just might decide that a life of crime isn't worth the risk.
< Message edited by TreasureKY -- 12/30/2010 7:15:54 AM >
|