|
rulemylife -> RE: FLASHBACK: Gore Reports Snow and Ice Across World Vanishing Quickly... (1/2/2011 9:18:08 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: truckinslave
You relentlessly express two ideas on these boards:
1. Show me a site!!! Show me a site!!!!
2. Your site is bullshit!!!
This is tiresome.
Yes, I know.
It is tiresome to have to prove what you say.
It's so much easier to spit out whatever pops into your brain and hope that people will believe it.
By the way, the word is cite, not site.
quote:
The facts are clear. Legal Team 0bama0 has gotten upwards of a dozen cases concerning his eligibility for office thrown out of court, all on the grounds that the plaintiffs lacked standing. At least one of these cases was appealled to SCOTUS.
Which means that either Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy paid for all the legal work associated with these cases or 0bama0 did. It's an either/or deal dude. You seem to think the legal work was, what, cheap? The cost was neglible? I think otherwise. WND and others have estimated the minimum cost at 1.7 million.
Another fact not in dispute, and no I am not going to play your site/bullshit game. 0bama0 has refused to discuss said costs.
Would that be anything like you refusing to discuss anything but the nonsense you read on a site (site as opposed to cite, see the difference?) run by people who, to put it politely, have a less than firm grasp on reality.
WorldNetDaily - Wikipedia
9/11 attacks On September 13, 2001, WND published a commentary by Anthony C. LoBaido regarding the September 11 attacks on New York City and Washington, D.C., two days earlier. In his column, LoBaido outlined what he regarded as the moral depravity of America in general and New York in particular, asking whether, "God (has) raised up Shiite Islam as a sword against America."
Libel lawsuit On September 20, 2000, WND published an article claiming that Clark Jones, a Savannah, Tennessee car dealer and fund-raiser for then-Vice President Al Gore, had interfered with a criminal investigation, had been a "subject" of a criminal investigation, was listed on law enforcement computers as a "dope dealer," and implied that he had ties to others involved in alleged criminal activity.
In 2001, Jones filed a lawsuit against WND; the reporters, Charles C. Thompson II and Tony Hays; the Center for Public Integrity, which had underwritten Thompson and Hays' reporting on the article and related ones and various Tennessee publications and broadcasters who he accused of repeating the claim, claiming libel and defamation. The lawsuit had been scheduled to go to trial in March 2008; but, on February 13, 2008, WND announced that a confidential out-of-court settlement had been reached with Jones. A settlement statement jointly drafted by all parties in the lawsuit states in part: Discovery has revealed to WorldNetDaily.com that no witness verifies the truth of what the witnesses are reported by authors to have stated. Additionally, no document has been discovered that provides any verification that the statements written were true. Factual discovery in the litigation and response from Freedom of Information Act requests to law enforcement agencies confirm Clark Jones' assertion that his name has never been on law enforcement computers, that he has not been the subject of any criminal investigation nor has he interfered with any investigation as stated in the articles. Discovery has also revealed that the sources named in the publications have stated under oath that statements attributed to them in the articles were either not made by them, were misquoted by the authors, were misconstrued, or the statements were taken out of context.
|
|
|
|
