CelticPrince -> RE: The Classic Dominant ! (1/5/2011 2:46:00 PM)
|
quote:
Hello CP, If you have a look at the thread I linked in my answer, you'll see I did offer my interpretation of a dominant "look". As I said, this has less to do with physical appearance and everything, at least for me, to do with attitude and/or behavior. I get the feeling you're trying to get people to offer a description that would fit into what I call a 'Hollywood dom/me' role. I could offer the example of Heathcliff played by Laurence Olivier in the original Wuthering Heights movie, but while he was a sexy brooding character...he was also weak, angry, vengeful and overbearing. Not, in my opinion, the way a dominant individual conducts him/herself. If Hollywood is what you'd like, here's a couple of examples I'd like to offer. Listen to the words and ignore the actor speaking them....the words are what matter. Integrity Character As I said, dominance and submission, for me, are personality traits and characteristics and not some 'lifestyle' label or role you throw over yourself when attending a munch or engaging in kinky play with your partner/s. The interesting thing is, all of the examples I offered could be used to describe both dominant and submissive people, regardless of the 'lifestyle' role they choose to place themselves in. Anything else is going to be an individual, and personal, experience. With that in mind...how can there be only one "Classic Dominant" example? Greetings Bones, It is not what I like or a preconceived mold of a particulat "D"; but rather an attempt to look for a thread that has reconized commonality across the "D" spectrum. The D is just one part of the equation on one side of the slash but the "good" ones generally do share common thraits. CP
|
|
|
|