RE: Raising the debt ceiling (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


rulemylife -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/23/2011 8:55:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

This from a man who is only interested in pussy....[8|]



Men are such pigs!






tazzygirl -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/23/2011 8:55:47 AM)

lol.. and we women love men for it!




BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/23/2011 8:57:03 AM)

I hope you are merely a buffoon.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Is that the idea ? We just don't care what is owed ? Actually once the decision is made to never pay it back, why the hell would we care how much it is ?


If you recall what I wrote in http://www.collarchat.com/m_3535153/tm.htm a portion of what the government takes in is phony money where inflation is a form of indirect taxation. It seems to me that phony money shows up as phony debit. I'm not talking about the sort of debit the government has taken on recently, however. Because the government is not as large as we are led to believe, the effect of whatever debit that is assumed will not be as significant as one might imagine. Also, sometimes it is best to keep doing business as usual until you are thinking more clearly. I do not feel that as a nation we are thinking clearly.




BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/24/2011 5:11:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

This from a man who is only interested in pussy....[8|]


I never said that I was only interested in pussy. What I seek is a select few who possess what is known as a pussy. Admittedly, dick is a disqualifying factor. One must view a pussy holistically. A pussy has a mind. A pussy has a body whose sole use isn't sex by the way. Pussy even has a soul. Pussy also has needs. Pussy needs love and pussy needs praise. If she is willing to be more than a mere sex organ, more specifically a thing worthy of love, I am prepared to refer to her as a female. Typically, females do have a pussy.

Extensionally speaking one might see little difference, but intentionally there is a profound difference. I am willing to honor the intentional, according to what God intended, if she is so agreeable. In every female there is a goddess worthy of adoration, but to be this goddess she must walk so many feet behind me. If a different sort of relationship works for others, I'm fine with that. This is what I require.

For some reason many here seem to think that beauty and intelligence are qualities possessed only by dominant females.

I adore females for their goodness and dam them for their evil ways.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

I did a memorable scene with a female friend of mine once where I was walking along a Hawaiian beach with my friend tagging along in chains. I said, "It's such a wonderful day." and her response was, "It is Sir."


It is fun to engage in a little play. Power exchange can also be made a life style. Nothing wrong with that. It greases the wheel. There are also limits to what love can do for you. It's called getting practical or down to Earth. It's healthy to realize it. But is it healthy to pursue a puritanical agenda where there is no love at all where you care not what becomes of your lover? You don't always have to show love or be perceived as loving, but it seems to me at least a foregone conclusion that you must love.

If this should be a weakness by which you can be manipulated, it is as the creator intended. Lovers manipulate each other for happiness sake. A good witch is the best sort of lover a dominant man can have. A female skilled in the art of manipulation is to be admired. What matters is whether or not she has mingled her power with yours so that you are no longer a man, but a fearsome god, "Fear me my love for I am great." In silence the witch replies, "It is true for I have given you all that I am and I am not nothing."




tazzygirl -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/24/2011 5:16:51 AM)

quote:

I never said that I was only interested in pussy. What I seek is a select few who possess what is known as a pussy. Admittedly, dick is a disqualifying factor. One must view a pussy holistically. A pussy has a mind. A pussy has a body whose sole use isn't sex by the way. Pussy even has a soul. Pussy also has needs. Pussy needs love and pussy needs praise. If she is willing to be more than a mere sex organ, more specifically a thing worthy of love, I am prepared to refer to her as a female. Typically, females do have a pussy.


Yeah, and how is that working out for you?




BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/24/2011 4:51:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

I never said that I was only interested in pussy. What I seek is a select few who possess what is known as a pussy. Admittedly, dick is a disqualifying factor. One must view a pussy holistically. A pussy has a mind. A pussy has a body whose sole use isn't sex by the way. Pussy even has a soul. Pussy also has needs. Pussy needs love and pussy needs praise. If she is willing to be more than a mere sex organ, more specifically a thing worthy of love, I am prepared to refer to her as a female. Typically, females do have a pussy.


Yeah, and how is that working out for you?


Honestly, I think women should cross dress online more so they can see what they are like. Since women are not men the picture they would get would not be entirely accurate, but it might clue them in on something. A great many women feel they are so wonderful and such victims that they could not possibly be monsters.




tazzygirl -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/24/2011 10:27:23 PM)

Didnt think it was working too well. And you proved me right.




BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/25/2011 2:53:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Didnt think it was working too well. And you proved me right.


Are you not admitting that you may be one of these monsters?




tazzygirl -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/25/2011 5:10:47 AM)

Not at all.. But I prefer a man who has the ability to stomp on my leash... not one who will beg me to walk him.




BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/25/2011 8:16:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Not at all.. But I prefer a man who has the ability to stomp on my leash... not one who will beg me to walk him.


I noticed that I've been misspelling debt as debit as in deb-it! You must be willing to at least admit that I need a secretary, that is a little subbie to take care of these submissive details for me? It is a shame for a man such as myself to be subject to such petty mockery. It is a crime against all that is holy. I see it offends you as well.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

I want her goodness to amaze me and express itself as a well with no bottom. Love is mysterious because it is such a well. Her wetness continues to flow in the absence of any truly rational explanation for it to do so.


What I require is love that is real. I am not a lesser man to desire or accept anything less. She must be truly beautiful. Is such a request unreasonable? What you wrote is not truly beautiful. It is a shameless declaration that you have a selfish desire.

Does your wetness flow in the absence of any truly rational explanation for it to do so?




tazzygirl -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/25/2011 8:31:36 AM)

quote:

What you wrote is not truly beautiful. It is a shameless declaration that you have a selfish desire.


Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And the one who holds my leash is the only set of eyes i have to worry about.




BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/25/2011 9:06:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And the one who holds my leash is the only set of eyes i have to worry about.


I am familiar with the logical underpinnings of what you wrote. Notice my use of the term "rational explanation". The problem is you are all a product of rational design and is the reason why many of you cannot grasp the idea that a God exists. In rational design there is no such a thing as love. Why does the sky not fall or the economy collapse? There is no rational explanation for it. God loves us. Do not seek a rational explanation for it, because there is none.




mnottertail -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/25/2011 9:10:31 AM)

Uh, there is a hell of a lot more rational explanation of why the sky doesn't fall than a god, angular momentum, space-time and gravity, celestial mechanics, and the fact that it sort of does fall, but theres so damn much of it, there isn't any more room for it, only 5 pounds of shit to a 5 pound sack.  the weight of the atmosphere at sea level is greater than that of the weight at 1 mile high, you don't need a god to understand simple shit like that.

And well--- define collapse, I mean even junk has a value, so collapsing is in the eye of the beholder, not in the eye of a god.




BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/27/2011 4:59:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Uh, there is a hell of a lot more rational explanation of why the sky doesn't fall than a god, angular momentum, space-time and gravity, celestial mechanics, and the fact that it sort of does fall, but theres so damn much of it, there isn't any more room for it, only 5 pounds of shit to a 5 pound sack.  the weight of the atmosphere at sea level is greater than that of the weight at 1 mile high, you don't need a god to understand simple shit like that.

And well--- define collapse, I mean even junk has a value, so collapsing is in the eye of the beholder, not in the eye of a god.


Since I am an oracle of sorts I suppose it is incumbent upon me to answer your question. I notice that you got the spelling of damn right when I didn't. You must, damn things more often than I do.

It appears that I need to develop a list of English homophones for me to consult and become more familiar with. It would be nice to have a little subbie to help me with secretarial chores, but one must do with what one has, namely a humble spell checker demon that only gets it right half the time.

Making myself comfortable on a satin pillow. I thought the conversation was headed toward, What is the virtue of love? There are those who would challenge me on that one as well. Its more familiar form is religion verses the welfare state. To discuss love briefly, many are bewildered by the apparent obsessive interest religion has to encourage a thing that almost does not exist in this world, namely love; "Its intrusion interferes with our models. It is best done away with altogether." The atheists will argue why not concern yourself with things that matter? Things that will make this place a better world. When the illusion that love in this world exists in abundance is removed, either love becomes a thing that has betrayed you and you want to stomp it out or you realize that it is precious. Religion usually takes the later path. Those who rebel usually take the former.

I mentioned earlier that many important fields that humanity depends on are not structurally sound, which includes economics. The proponents of rational design realize this, however. Most everyone else does not. It is actually a profound intellectual achievement to recognize this simple fact. Ancient man realized this and is the reason he made offerings to, for example, a sun god. It is curious that the sky does not fall, but this also continues to be true in our day and age of rational design.

The problem with rational design is that there is a missing ingredient when you do away with what appear to be irrational superstitions. You manage to get much of it right, but a crucial ingredient is missing and so what you end up with is malnutrition despite having gotten most of it right. When you do away with love or meaning and so-called subjective things such as these.

Love is a ghost that belongs to the realm of the subtle and almost non-existent worlds.




mnottertail -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/27/2011 6:21:55 AM)

That is some really fucking grandiose asswipe, pal.




tazzygirl -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/27/2011 6:27:03 AM)

Posted on two different threads, no less.




Termyn8or -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/27/2011 8:58:46 AM)

I wonder what would happen if we put him in a room with Robert Pinkerton.

T^T




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 9 10 [11]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875