RE: Raising the debt ceiling

RE: Raising the debt ceiling (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Termyn8or -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/18/2011 8:35:26 PM)
You're just like all the rest. No matter how much you know, the head of your penis outrules the head on your shoulders. First of all, you can run a million computer simulations and get the wrong result if you do not program it and set the parameters correctly. To do so would require that you be omnipotent, which would eliminate the need for any computer at all. I lack the faith in any Man, Woman or supernatural beast to do so, even myself. Noone can impress me that much. Noone. With your constant out of bounds reference to pussy, my analysis of your psyche is near complete. While I do not consider you a molloch or a tyrant, you are not in possesion of the solution, nor are you likely to be. T

BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/18/2011 10:45:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or With your constant out of bounds reference to pussy, my analysis of your psyche is near complete. While I do not consider you a molloch or a tyrant, you are not in possesion of the solution, nor are you likely to be. I'm glad that I'm not a Moloch. Allow me to share with you something of what I wrote, but did not share. I wrote, "... You know, a bullshit artist. Whether you believe that or not will center entirely on your predilection and not the truth." I like pussy. I just don't get enough of it, that's all. I think pussy is very relevant. If I have not won over a few people for just saying that, then you are all hopeless!

Termyn8or -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/19/2011 12:10:13 AM)
"Whether you believe that or not will center entirely on your predilection and not the truth." " I can taste the religon in your words. Good luck with that. This is what got us here. And to persue same is indeed a sign of what ? And now, your well considered solution if you please. T

BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/19/2011 4:53:37 AM)
Will I not give up? CollarMe is a waste of my time. quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or "Whether you believe that or not will center entirely on your predilection and not the truth." " I can taste the religon in your words. Good luck with that. Actually, I was going to say the same of you. I didn't actually hint at it. I laid out a proof that you are motivated by faith, but for reasons unknown you are unable to face it. quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or This is what got us here. And to persue same is indeed a sign of what ? It is a sign that I believe that it is 85% right.

rulemylife -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/19/2011 8:58:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM I like pussy. I just don't get enough of it, that's all. Imagine that.

BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/19/2011 11:26:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM I like pussy. I just don't get enough of it, that's all. Imagine that. Let us explore this thought. What effect would the 85 15 rule have on sex? Think of it as 85% sex with another 15% that is more difficult to identify. According to theory, it is that 15% where things can get interesting. Now what does this have to do with the national debit? For that we need to return to the ideas of Wilhelm Reich. LOL, you see the problem is we need more orgone energy.

Termyn8or -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/19/2011 11:59:22 AM)
I think Reich was a crackpot, but also the Pope. In my opinion all religion is bullshit, as well as the psuedoreligion. If you're in prison, try to get an appointment with the warden. T^T

rulemylife -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/19/2011 4:03:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM I like pussy. I just don't get enough of it, that's all. Imagine that. Let us explore this thought. What effect would the 85 15 rule have on sex? Think of it as 85% sex with another 15% that is more difficult to identify. According to theory, it is that 15% where things can get interesting. Now what does this have to do with the national debit? For that we need to return to the ideas of Wilhelm Reich. LOL, you see the problem is we need more orgone energy. Or maybe more Viagra.

BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/19/2011 5:32:18 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM I like pussy. I just don't get enough of it, that's all. Imagine that. Let us explore this thought. What effect would the 85 15 rule have on sex? Think of it as 85% sex with another 15% that is more difficult to identify. According to theory, it is that 15% where things can get interesting. Now what does this have to do with the national debit? For that we need to return to the ideas of Wilhelm Reich. LOL, you see the problem is we need more orgone energy. Or maybe more Viagra. No, what I'm talking about is if you vote for me, I promise that I will sponsor a bill for there to be orgasm enhancement centers throughout the country to train the nation to focus its orgone energy in productive ways. This way we could tell the world that we are not all a bunch of unruly dominants, but we have submissives here to and we are worthy of love. It could be one big orgy.

Termyn8or -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/19/2011 6:44:21 PM)
Every time I think I've seen it all, something like this comes up. I mean I thought I was pretty well set when I saw a craigslist ad from someone looking for weed, but alas, it was not the end. T^T

BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/19/2011 11:21:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or Every time I think I've seen it all, something like this comes up. A man without critics is no man at all. I was just reading up on the history of Ghana. Ghana is an African nation. The story was moving. Their experience showed that much is needed. It isn't just one thing that gets you where you want, but a host of things that you have got to get right. It isn't simple. They went bankrupt and there were a whole lot of people who didn't care. I'm talking about an event that occurred in their history. My pool runs deep and meant to caress only bare women. I understand. It is jealousy. You curse God for not having what I have which naturally saddens me. :-( If only more people could bask in my light. Revision History I needed to remove an extraneous trailing d from experience.

BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/20/2011 8:23:12 AM)
The following is a copy of post written by Termyn8or from another thread and a copy of my response. I felt it important to elaborate further on what I wrote here. quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or Everything that requires a license is illegal. A license is actually a permit to break the law. No argument is valid, that is the way it is. Look at it logically and it comes clear. And yes that means permits as well. Fixing the wiring in your own house is illegal. A contractor's license is a permit to break the law. If it were not so it would not be possible to impose fines or any other penalties. Talk to me, I want to hear the fucked up logic that disputes this fact. T quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM What you wrote is compelling in that it has the appearance of a clean argument. I find your appeal to logic irritating, however. I intimidated this earlier when I spoke briefly about publishing in another thread. You are lacking a formal education in logic much in the say same attorneys are lacking a formal education in logic. The problem with your appeal to logic is that law is not self-consistent. In general you can use logic to solve a problem in mathematics, but not so in law. Law has a logical veneer. Logic is applicable to law in limited ways. You tend to believe that your knowledge transfers to subjects you know little about. You have some of the basics down, but you still have much to learn. I encourage you to engage in further study of the subject. I am your superior in this area. I am after all a Vulcan. Allow me to state what I wrote in another thread in another way. No doubt this will be a relevation to many. Your argument is not structurally sound because law is not structurally sound. In order to publish in a scholarly publication you must be an expert in your field. This alone makes the effort worth it. It is proof that you reached the summit and are sufficiently qualified to make a contribution to the field. Your rebuttal on this point was nonsense and something I went into the long post that I did not post. quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or Talk to me, I want to hear the fucked up logic that disputes this fact. Logic has something going for it. There is a right and wrong answer. What I wrote is indisputable. What is wrong with your argument is that it is deceptive in that it is deceptively simple. It does not admit that it is weak. What Musicmystery wrote here earlier contained an admission that the argument was weak. It is the 85% that I have been talking about. The problem with his position is that though the weakness is admitted up front formally, it is usually a fact that is summarily ignored. Revision History I needed to clean up a awkward sentence and a minor problem with another sentence.

Musicmystery -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/20/2011 8:40:22 AM)
quote: he problem with his position is that though the weakness is admitted up front formally, it is usually a fact that is summarily ignored. The problem with the position is that you insist on bringing assumptions it doesn't share, and using that misinformation to postulate positions I don't hold, steering the discussion onto something else entirely, not at all related to the original point. Me: apples You: But oranges. Me: Yes, but here I'm talking about apples. You: The fact that there are oranges means apples are flawed. Me: This is a waste of time--it's pointless and going in circles. You: My superior logic has again won the day, as it does 85% of the time, since I create my own reality.

BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/20/2011 9:39:03 AM)
I hope the above will help better explain what I've been talking about. Your training is incomplete. It is causing you to arrive at wrong conclusions. It is my intention to be a voice of reason which is something I hope you can appreciate even if we have disagreements. The following is an excerpt from that long post that I did not post. I wrote: quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM Is my interest to experience females and to dominate them genuine? I would have to say so. A true dominant is a torch bearer of sanity. Though I wish to dominate females it is my desire to see them excel and prosper under my, perhaps harsh, asymmetric rule. I want them to know that they are loved. I want their hearts to be filled with enough love that they fear that their hearts may burst with joy. Those who are cynical will say that such a thing could not possibly be real. It is what I want nonetheless. In the Temple of Diana there is an inscription that reads, "Deprivation increases desire." I have longed to love and for my longing my feeling is great. Revision History My use of the colon resulted in an ambiguity that needed fixing. I also changed the bold to italic.

BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/20/2011 9:50:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: he problem with his position is that though the weakness is admitted up front formally, it is usually a fact that is summarily ignored. The problem with the position is that you insist on bringing assumptions it doesn't share, and using that misinformation to postulate positions I don't hold, steering the discussion onto something else entirely, not at all related to the original point. You are reaffirmation what you wrote earlier. You have the floor. You can make what points you desire. Don't let me stop you. I have no doubt that you have something meaningful to offer. You too know things as a result of long and patient study. Spoken tongue and cheek, Did I not refer to you as a wise owl?

tazzygirl -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/20/2011 10:17:15 AM)
quote: The following is an excerpt from that long post that I did not post. If you did not post it, how are you quoting it?

BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/20/2011 10:32:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: The following is an excerpt from that long post that I did not post. If you did not post it, how are you quoting it? Though it remains in draft form I did write it out. My ways are indeed novel.

tazzygirl -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/20/2011 10:36:54 AM)
Novel isnt the word i would have chosen

rulemylife -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/20/2011 10:47:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM I was just reading up on the history of Ghana. Ghana is an African nation. Are you sure? I thought it was somewhere in Canada.

BenevolentM -> RE: Raising the debt ceiling (1/20/2011 11:04:38 AM)
The goal in life for a true dyed in the wool intellectual is neither money nor power. It is the satisfaction of having scaled Mt. Olympus. Sadly, this goal is usually in conflict with sexual desire and needs.

Page: << < prev 6 7 [8] 9 10 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875