CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: naughtynick81 CallaFirestormBW I have asked this question to many feminists. Why call themselves feminists if they are truly about gender equality? I think "humanists" sounds better instead of a one sided view. If a movement only cares about women, it's not equality. Such as VAWA. It's female centred, not equality centred I think that part of the problem may be that there isn't an effective term for the "next step". Using the term "humanist", while accurate, would provide substantial confusion since it is already used by a particular philosophical path that many women do not find themselves inclined to follow (secular humanism). I wonder, some days, whether all the drive we have to "label" ourselves into neat pockets that are easily defined in a sound-byte or two inhibits our ability to actually reach any kind of widely expansive goal like "acceptance and equality regardless of race, hair color, gender, who one loves, how many tattoos one has... " Calla
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|