Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/13/2011 5:10:54 PM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline 		http://www.military.com/news/article/army-mulls-women-in-combat-arms-units.html?ESRC=army-a.nl

Bout time
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/13/2011 5:22:26 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		Why?

Woman are not that dumb.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/13/2011 7:52:47 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		Let them fight one week of every month. Even the taliban won't mess with them.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/13/2011 8:03:04 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Let them fight one week of every month. Even the taliban won't mess with them.



Reminds Me of one of Larry the Cable Guy's jokes about women and gays in the military.

"Use them as a team. First, send in the guys. If they get bogged down, send in a bunch of PMSing women. Then, when it's all over, send in the gays to redecorate."

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/13/2011 8:07:26 PM   
hlen5


Posts: 5890
Joined: 3/2/2008
Status: offline 		I think it should be openly acknowledged that our women service members are in harm's way already.

ETA: Oops, should have read the article first. NM

< Message edited by hlen5 -- 1/13/2011 8:10:52 PM >

_____________________________



My fave Thread: http://www.collarchat.com/m_2626198/mpage_1/tm.htm

One time "Phallus Expert Extraordinaire"

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/13/2011 9:07:38 PM   
lazarus1983


Posts: 828
Joined: 2/25/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Why?

Woman are not that dumb.



Your usual bad grammar and spelling are funny on their own. This time it's dead on hilarious.

_____________________________

The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.

- Ayn Rand

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 12:19:50 AM   
Charles6682


Posts: 1820
Joined: 10/1/2007
From: Saint Pete,FL
Status: offline 		Canada does it.So should we.I dont see why not.As long as the Lady is capable and is aware of the danger,go for it.The Armed Forces should make sure that she is capable,just like they make sure the men they send out are capable as well.

< Message edited by Charles6682 -- 1/14/2011 12:21:26 AM >

_____________________________

Charley aka Sub Guy

http://www.Facebook.com/SubGuy

https://Twitter.com/SubGuy6682

(in reply to lazarus1983)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 2:15:54 AM   
Jaybeee


Posts: 532
Joined: 2/2/2010
Status: offline 		This would be sweet. Watching the government trying and failing to fill 48.7% of front-line positions with women because most of them are too...what's that word? Oh yes, COWARDLY to fight.

When force must be applied, you don't run to Mummy's coat-tail's. You go straight to the Daddy.

_____________________________

Mastery in motion since 2005

Women of the world, submit!

(in reply to Charles6682)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 3:51:47 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline 		There's prolly quite a few Dommes on this site who would delight in disputing your silly claim with you personally Jaybee

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 1/14/2011 3:52:36 AM >

_____________________________



(in reply to Jaybeee)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 3:57:35 AM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Let them fight one week of every month. Even the taliban won't mess with them.

Reminds me of the Robin Williams line: "A female president would be a great thing. You'd never get any wars, just every 28 days some intense negotiations".

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 5:22:31 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

There's prolly quite a few Dommes on this site who would delight in disputing your silly claim with you personally Jaybee

Unfortunately, tweakabelle, you cant practice CBT on someone that has no C or B.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 7:18:48 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lazarus1983


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Why?

Woman are not that dumb.



Your usual bad grammar and spelling are funny on their own. This time it's dead on hilarious.


Maybe it would be better if you specified exactly what is wrong with that sentence. Then rather than just being insulting, you could actually teach him something. You can start with which word is misspelled? Then maybe you could reword it so it is grammatically correct. Unless of course there was nothing actually wrong with his post and you were just taking the opportunity to be a snarky little git.


To the OP: I think women should have the choice to go into combat, but I don't understand why they would want to.


_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to lazarus1983)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 7:29:17 AM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
Maybe it would be better if you specified exactly what is wrong with that sentence. Then rather than just being insulting, you could actually teach him something. You can start with which word is misspelled? Then maybe you could reword it so it is grammatically correct. Unless of course there was nothing actually wrong with his post and you were just taking the opportunity to be a snarky little git.

While agreeing with you in principle, I would point out that trying to educate people is often wasted effort, and only causes others to become sarcastic themselves. In PA's case, it's also completely wasted effort; he's batshit crazy, trolls for fun, and even repeated thumping of him with a clue-by-four isn't going to do it.

And it was a splendidly ironic fuck-up/typo :)

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 7:30:05 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: lazarus1983


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Why?

Woman are not that dumb.



Your usual bad grammar and spelling are funny on their own. This time it's dead on hilarious.


Maybe it would be better if you specified exactly what is wrong with that sentence. Then rather than just being insulting, you could actually teach him something. You can start with which word is misspelled? Then maybe you could reword it so it is grammatically correct. Unless of course there was nothing actually wrong with his post and you were just taking the opportunity to be a snarky little git.


To the OP: I think women should have the choice to go into combat, but I don't understand why they would want to.



Maybe it would be better if you stop the self-righteousness.

If you want to teach him something then do it, but don't complain when other people get tired of listening to it.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 7:37:24 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
Maybe it would be better if you specified exactly what is wrong with that sentence. Then rather than just being insulting, you could actually teach him something. You can start with which word is misspelled? Then maybe you could reword it so it is grammatically correct. Unless of course there was nothing actually wrong with his post and you were just taking the opportunity to be a snarky little git.

While agreeing with you in principle, I would point out that trying to educate people is often wasted effort, and only causes others to become sarcastic themselves. In PA's case, it's also completely wasted effort; he's batshit crazy, trolls for fun, and even repeated thumping of him with a clue-by-four isn't going to do it.

And it was a splendidly ironic fuck-up/typo :)



So maybe you can tell me exactly what was wrong with his post? Which words did he misspell? What part of the sentence was grammatically wrong? Now I have seen PA post some pretty strange shit that looked like it was proofread by a 3rd grader, but I don't understand why lazarus picked that particular post to comment on. Unless like I said before, he couldn't resist the chance to take a shot at PA. Believe it or not, some posters actually get some kind of twisted satisfaction out of belittling others. I suppose it makes them feel smarter in comparison. But enough of the hijack. I wouldn't want to get mod spanked.


_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 7:40:50 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
Maybe it would be better if you specified exactly what is wrong with that sentence. Then rather than just being insulting, you could actually teach him something. You can start with which word is misspelled? Then maybe you could reword it so it is grammatically correct. Unless of course there was nothing actually wrong with his post and you were just taking the opportunity to be a snarky little git.

While agreeing with you in principle, I would point out that trying to educate people is often wasted effort, and only causes others to become sarcastic themselves. In PA's case, it's also completely wasted effort; he's batshit crazy, trolls for fun, and even repeated thumping of him with a clue-by-four isn't going to do it.

And it was a splendidly ironic fuck-up/typo :)



So maybe you can tell me exactly what was wrong with his post? Which words did he misspell? What part of the sentence was grammatically wrong? Now I have seen PA post some pretty strange shit that looked like it was proofread by a 3rd grader, but I don't understand why lazarus picked that particular post to comment on. Unless like I said before, he couldn't resist the chance to take a shot at PA. Believe it or not, some posters actually get some kind of twisted satisfaction out of belittling others. I suppose it makes them feel smarter in comparison. But enough of the hijack. I wouldn't want to get mod spanked.



Oh for fuck's sake.

Woman is singular, the correct usage was women.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 7:41:10 AM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
So maybe you can tell me exactly what was wrong with his post? Which words did he misspell?

It should have been "women are not that dumb". The special irony comes in someone male describing how another gender are brighter, while proving the point themselves beyond all redemption, in just 5 words.

I realise that any joke you have to explain is by default never going to be funny to anyone else, but I could see exactly what lazarus was driving at :)

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 7:45:42 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
So maybe you can tell me exactly what was wrong with his post? Which words did he misspell?

It should have been "women are not that dumb". The special irony comes in someone male describing how another gender are brighter, while proving the point themselves beyond all redemption, in just 5 words.

I realise that any joke you have to explain is by default never going to be funny to anyone else, but I could see exactly what lazarus was driving at :)



You are correct. I missed the "e". Well that was certainly worth calling him out on. I am sure you and lazarus have never made a typo before, maybe one day PA can be as perfect as you two are.


_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 7:47:38 AM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
You are correct. I missed the "e". Well that was certainly worth calling him out on. I am sure you and lazarus have never made a typo before, maybe one day PA can be as perfect as you two are.

Getting snippy because you failed to see a joke isn't good reason to have a pop at others. It's just churlish.

Have a sit-down and a nice cup of tea or coffee. Hopefully your SoH will return shortly.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 7:48:53 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		oh ffs. pa makes racist comments and doesnt even have the decency to appologize for them, instead decides deleting teh entry is "good enough", and you want to defend him???

give me a fucking break.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094