SweetDommes
Posts: 3313
Joined: 10/5/2004 Status: offline
|
I work in corrections at a re-entry/education facility, which means that the offenders can wear "street clothes" at the facility instead of uniforms. It makes my life a heck of a lot easier knowing that if I see an arm with a tattoo on it, it's an offender and not an officer (i.e. if I see an arm reaching through the med window and it has tattoos visible on it, I can injure him). If officers have tattoos on their lower arms, they either have to wear long sleeves or a bandage over it. In my opinion, it's not so much an "us vs them" mentality, as making it easy to identify who is who. Just like dress codes at any other place - I am required to wear scrubs, minimal jewelry (one necklace, one bracelet or watch, wedding band - engagement rings are only allowed if the stone is "modest," earrings can't be dangling and no more than 2 per ear, etc.), my hair must be kept neat (although I can have long hair), and no visible tattoos. It would be similar at a hospital, extended care facility, doctor's office, or school/other workplace. It's a part of being professional and easy to identify in a hurry, if needed. It doesn't matter if it's a private healthcare setting or a government run one - 98% of the dress codes I've run across are identical for nurses. From my viewpoint, I don't see why it should be so different for a police officer. They are an authority figure, and how they present themselves will change how they are viewed. They also need to be easily identifiable, and the uniform isn't always enough. If all I can see is part of a person and not the whole person, I'm not going to assume that the person with a full sleeve tattoo of dragons and naked women is a police officer. I do hope that none of the current officers lose their jobs - but at the same time, I understand the mindset behind the new rules.
_____________________________
Miss Karen and Miss Holly Earth is the insane asylum for the universe. Friends are God's apology for relatives
|