Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
I guess I should've been more clear. In trying to keep posts short I guess some things get missed. You want to keep drunk drivers off the road then PUT THEM IN JAIL. Very few people drink and drive while in jail. Secondly, let's see some real standards. Cop suspects a driver of being unable to drive safely, administer some typr of physical test, not a breathalyzer. They are worth shit. This would automatically cover all drugs wouldn't it ? Before cars existed, if you ran someone over with a horse and buggy you would be held accountable. No ? Same deal. Impaired is impaired. Alcohol is singled out because it is easily detected in the breath, making it easy to fuel the money game. Not to change the subject, but I still think that senator is an ass wipe. He's looking for support or something. Controversy to put his name in front of people's faces. Maybe there are so many drunk drivers he wants to win a voting bloc or some shit. I see no point in persuing such an action at this time, and I bet 90% of people agree with me for whatever reason. I conclude that it's all for show. What show I don't know. All this will be academic soon enough anyway, because nobody will be able to afford a car. How many people can't now ? Find me one industry that serves the major market that is COMING to this country rather than LEAVING it. Ask who is to blame. And before you blame these companies ask yourself one question. Who made it so attractive to move the major industries out of this country ? If you answer that big business bought the government and was responsible for this trend, then it follows that regulations are at the whim of lobbyists. If you answer that the government advocates the loss of jobs for their constituents, then they are even worse traitors. That they are not simply born with a price tag on their head, that they really want to see this country fall. It's one or the other, except for one other possibility, that they really are that fucking stupid. That would indicate that our entire educational system should be scrapped. Have you any other posilibties to present ? So given one of those three mindsets (if they can be called that), which is it ? In any of the three possibilities I can see, this dweeb has no intention of doing anything to restore people's rights. And they are not called human rights or civil rights. They are called rights. When you use a right and create a wrong society punishes you, usually by incarceration. There is nothing unconstitutional about it. But if your horse injures someone and you are found to be wreckless in that regard, do they forbid you from riding horses ? If you are a carpenter and your hammer falls and hurts someone after a three beer lunch with a BigBohungusBurger at the bar, are you forbidden to pound nails ? And since we all seem to agree that putting drunk drivers in jail is not a bad thing, what about the real assholes out there who have no such "excuse" ? T^T
|