RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

rulemylife -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:03:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim

And the documentation you provided is grossly misleading...salary is only one part of "compensation".



Which is what I have been saying all along.

The reason people take these relatively low-paying jobs are for the benefits and security involved.

When you cut those things who do you think is going to teach your children, police your neighborhood, respond to fires?



Sanity -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:03:47 AM)


I was an above average student in a one-size-fits-all curriculum, so no I want at all impressed with my public school teachers. Especially since the entire class was set at the pace of the slowest learners, the whole thing got old fast.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

So that's a "yes", then. Thought so.



Moonhead -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:06:15 AM)

I see. You'd rather the whole thing had been geared towards the students who needed the least help, and yourself and the c stream got fucked, then?



rulemylife -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:07:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


You miss everything, which is why you are so often ignored on here.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I think thats the worst I have ever been insulted on here, being compared to you rml.



Did I miss something?

Who compared me to you?




But you didn't ignore me Sanity.


[sm=hearts.gif][sm=waiting.gif]



Sanity -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:10:04 AM)


(Again, for the slowest student) -You must be doing well, to consider a $50,000.000 per year average base salary a "low paying job". Especially when you consider they get full medical without contributing a dime, full retirement without contributing a dime, summers off, feet up on a desk all day... and so on.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
Which is what I have been saying all along.

The reason people take these relatively low-paying jobs are for the benefits and security involved.

When you cut those things who do you think is going to teach your children, police your neighborhood, respond to fires?




RacerJim -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:11:30 AM)

SEIU is spam-mailing a plea to show your support for the NEA in Wisconsin. BASTARDS! How did they get my email address?



rulemylife -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:11:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


(Again, for the slowest student) -You must be doing well, to consider a $50,000.000 per year average base salary a "low paying job".


Yeah, I don't have to live in Idaho either.



TheHeretic -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:13:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

The reason people take these relatively low-paying jobs are for the benefits and security involved.




Goebbels would be so proud of you.



Sanity -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:13:33 AM)


Yeah, stay away, lifes horrible here. Worst place EVARRR

[;)]

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

Yeah, I don't have to live in Idaho either.




rulemylife -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:15:27 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

The reason people take these relatively low-paying jobs are for the benefits and security involved.




Goebbels would be so proud of you.


Let me ask Richie, do you honestly ever make sense to yourself?



rulemylife -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:16:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Yeah, stay away, lifes horrible here. Worst place EVARRR

[;)]

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

Yeah, I don't have to live in Idaho either.




I've been there, so trust me I know.



Sanity -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:17:21 AM)


Or alternatively, the lazy greedy teachers could do their jobs.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

I see. You'd rather the whole thing had been geared towards the students who needed the least help, and yourself and the c stream got fucked, then?



Sanity -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:19:37 AM)


Normally I do ignore you, along with crazy lucy, mnot, moonbeam, and the rest of you mouth breathing leftist trolls. Occasionally though, Im in the mood to shoot fish in a barrel.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

But you didn't ignore me Sanity.


[sm=hearts.gif][sm=waiting.gif]




Musicmystery -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:20:51 AM)

quote:

a $50,000 per year average base salary


Base? That's higher than the Wisconsin average.

http://www.teachersalaryinfo.com/average-teacher-salary-wisconsin.html




Sanity -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:21:08 AM)


Do everyone a huge favor and spread the word

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

I've been there, so trust me I know.




Sanity -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:25:55 AM)


The figures you linked to are old, but still theyre awfully close to 50k.

Not even a good try.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Base? That's higher than the Wisconsin average.

http://www.teachersalaryinfo.com/average-teacher-salary-wisconsin.html





Musicmystery -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:36:36 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The figures you linked to are old, but still theyre awfully close to 50k.

Not even a good try.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Base? That's higher than the Wisconsin average.

http://www.teachersalaryinfo.com/average-teacher-salary-wisconsin.html




An excellent try when you were claiming $100,000/yr, twice that just a few pages ago.

And still the AVERAGE, not the BASE--which would of course be lower, to counter the higher paid ones you're bemoaning.




joether -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:45:54 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave
Do you think it's "funny" when public sector unions donate money almost exclusively to Dim candidates? When they vote almost exclusively Dim? When they get sweetheart deals from Dim administrations?

I suppose not. After all, the shoe doesn't hurt until it's on the other foot.


Why do we always have to correct conservatives on PROPER NAMES? Is that REALLY tough to show some respect for our form of Goverment? If you don't like it TS....MOVE....out of the country.

If you dont like Unions donating to their canidates of choice, guess what? TOUGH SH*T. Last I checked, Republicans donate to the canidates they want. Lobbist donate to who they want. And Corporations....they donate to who they like too. So if you dont want Unions to be allowed to donate to Democrats, make a law and get it passed through the House, Senate, and the President. Even if it did pass the hurdles, I doubt it would pass Constitutional muster with regards to the 1st Amendment.

Oh, this would affect the NRA, Tea Party, and all the 'fly by night' operations (read: Shadow Organizations) that help fund the Republican take over of the House last November.



Sanity -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:46:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

An excellent try when you were claiming $100,000/yr, twice that just a few pages ago.


$100,000/yr total COMPENSATION, dumbass.

Youre as bad as rule... [:D]




Sanity -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (2/20/2011 8:51:14 AM)


Thanks joe, for underscoring one of the main problems with union thugs leeching off of the taxpayers. These "dues" are confiscated from the public employees then given to political candidates whether the union member agrees with the politics of the union bosses or not.

Taxpayer dollars going straight into campaign coffers is indeed a huge problem, even if one is too myopic to see it

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Why do we always have to correct conservatives on PROPER NAMES? Is that REALLY tough to show some respect for our form of Goverment? If you don't like it TS....MOVE....out of the country.

If you dont like Unions donating to their canidates of choice, guess what? TOUGH SH*T. Last I checked, Republicans donate to the canidates they want. Lobbist donate to who they want. And Corporations....they donate to who they like too. So if you dont want Unions to be allowed to donate to Democrats, make a law and get it passed through the House, Senate, and the President. Even if it did pass the hurdles, I doubt it would pass Constitutional muster with regards to the 1st Amendment.

Oh, this would affect the NRA, Tea Party, and all the 'fly by night' operations (read: Shadow Organizations) that help fund the Republican take over of the House last November.



Page: <<   < prev  20 21 [22] 23 24   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625