RE: SCOTT WALKER for President

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

mnottertail -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (3/4/2011 1:17:11 PM)
what is 0 divided by 0 as a percentage?

truckinslave -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (3/4/2011 1:20:05 PM)
An ottertail.

mnottertail -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (3/4/2011 1:22:07 PM)
Cute. Who are you supposed to be? Roy Orbison?

rulemylife -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (3/4/2011 1:24:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: truckinslave If Mister Palmer doesn't have the stomach to enforce the law he is in the wrong line of work. I think he would be happier in Illinois. What law would he be enforcing? The Republicans grandstanded and passed a ridiculous vote that is totally unenforceable.

truckinslave -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (3/4/2011 1:27:01 PM)
What law? The Wisconsin law that says their Senate has the right to hold fleebaggers in contempt and drag them to their Capitol Building in handcuffs, thereby creating a quorum.

mnottertail -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (3/4/2011 1:28:38 PM)
peering thru the statutes.......... is this mayhap a wisconsin, england statute from prior to the signing of the the magna charta?

joether -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (3/4/2011 1:40:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: truckinslave What law? The Wisconsin law that says their Senate has the right to hold fleebaggers in contempt and drag them to their Capitol Building in handcuffs, thereby creating a quorum. So if Democrats dont 'cave in' and 'obey' Republicans, they can be held in contemptment? Does that sound like 'Democracy' or 'The Republic' there truckin? Or does it sound like something a dictator would use? That is really what Mr. Walker has become. He wants to lord over the other public servants, keeping them as 2nd class citizens and obedient. And he has a pile of ignorant conservative lackeys all to happy to help, because he knows, they wont think things through to the logical conclusion(s).

rulemylife -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (3/4/2011 1:47:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: truckinslave What law? The Wisconsin law that says their Senate has the right to hold fleebaggers in contempt and drag them to their Capitol Building in handcuffs, thereby creating a quorum. Holding someone in contempt is not the same as issuing an arrest warrant. If you want to point out their authority for that I'm happy to listen. But then the issue remains that Wisconsin police have no jurisdiction in Illinois.

truckinslave -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (3/4/2011 2:01:07 PM)
quote: So if Democrats dont 'cave in' and 'obey' Republicans, they can be held in contemptment? Nope. but they do have to show up for work instead of fleebagging away in an attempt to nullify an entire election.

truckinslave -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (3/4/2011 2:02:34 PM)
quote: But then the issue remains that Wisconsin police have no jurisdiction in Illinois. Yup. That, and their own recalls.

mnottertail -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (3/4/2011 2:06:16 PM)
Not by a goddamn cheesehead state resolution, a goddamn full federal congressional bill of impeachment on Clinton did exactly what but provide toilet tissue to wipe another blue dress off. We get it the fuckers are in a tizzy. It does not appear that the opposition shares the pudpounding rhetoric and hysteria of the reasoned right in wisconsin.

truckinslave -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (3/4/2011 2:20:31 PM)
quote: It does not appear that the opposition shares the pudpounding rhetoric and hysteria I want to see them in handcuffs, in the Senate, weeping, as the body is called to order and the bill is passed.

mnottertail -> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President (3/4/2011 2:21:32 PM)
shit in one hand, wish in the other, one will be fulfilled.

Page: << < prev 36 37 38 39 [40]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125