LillyBoPeep -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/17/2011 5:55:36 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BenevolentM quote:
ORIGINAL: LillyBoPeep quote:
ORIGINAL: hlen5 Or they can just be themselves, for themselves. yep. our "purpose" isn't for some specific (typically male-centered interaction), unless we choose it. women have their own motivations, separate and apart from being "used" to either torment or uplift people like you. Modern women are monsters. Should a monster be free to be a monster? The answer is clearly no. If being yourself makes you a monster, then you must not be yourself. Being you cannot legitimately be pursued absolutely. You, as in the collective you, is again trying to make it all about me. You act as if you had the right to make such exceptions, that somehow it is not a reflection of who you are. An exception can only be legitimately made only if you are acting on something that is true, but not widely understood. The problem is you uplift no one. Rarely, do you ever uplift anyone even when you supposedly chose to do so. You are lying to yourselves. You figure that all you have to do is wrong the barer of the message and the problem will go away. And what do you do for anyone? I seriously doubt you are able to shirk your blatant self-centeredness to do any of this uplifiting that you feel is so vital. honestly we dont need to "wrong the bearer of the message," because you do a good enough job of that yourself. however, we do have opinions, and we have the right to share them. there are few things more monstrous than a person who can't see through his own delusions. that, sir, is you. whyyyyy am i wasting my time here?
|
|
|
|