RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BenevolentM -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/18/2011 5:11:46 PM)

Let's revisit the following Buddhist saying once again.

quote:


Neither fire nor wind, birth nor death can erase our good deeds.


http://festivals.iloveindia.com/buddha-purnima/buddha-quote.html

What does it mean? It means evil deeds in the long run don't matter.




tiggerspoohbear -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/18/2011 5:44:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FukinTroll
Um Cali... he did mention a g/f, duh!

SLURP~

Yeah, but she won't be gettin any since love transcends sex. Let's see how long she lasts.  [8D]




defiantbadgirl -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/18/2011 6:22:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

Modern women are monsters.


I'm not surprised you feel this way.


Narcissists are misogynists: they regard women as morally-lax, parasitic, predatory, and out to enslave them.

Narcissists abhor and dread getting emotionally intimate. The cerebral ones regard sex as a maintenance chore, something they have to do in order to keep their source of Secondary Supply. The somatic narcissist treats women as objects and sex as a means to obtaining narcissistic supply.

Narcissists are misogynists. They team up with women as mere sources of SNS (secondary narcissistic supply). The woman's chores are to accumulate past NS and release it in an orderly manner, so as to regulate the fluctuating flow of primary supply. Otherwise, cerebral narcissists are not interested in women. Most of them are non-sexual (engage in sexual acts very rarely, if at all). They hold women in contempt and abhor the thought of being really intimate with them. Usually, they choose submissive women, well below their level, to perform these functions. This leads to a vicious cycle of neediness, self-contempt ("how come I am dependent on this inferior woman") and contempt directed at the woman. Hence the abuse. When primary NS is available – the woman is hardly tolerated, as one would reluctantly pay the premium of an insurance policy.

Sound familiar?





ModTwentyOne -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/18/2011 7:33:55 PM)

Since the OP keeps bringing the subject back to religion, this thread will now be in the religion forum.





FukinTroll -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/18/2011 7:48:46 PM)

I'll come back in a week or so and pick over what is left of the carcass.

Jus say'n

SLURP~




BenevolentM -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/18/2011 7:49:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: defiantbadgirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

Modern women are monsters.


I'm not surprised you feel this way.

Narcissists are misogynists: they regard women as morally-lax, parasitic, predatory, and out to enslave them.

Narcissists abhor and dread getting emotionally intimate. The cerebral ones regard sex as a maintenance chore, something they have to do in order to keep their source of Secondary Supply. The somatic narcissist treats women as objects and sex as a means to obtaining narcissistic supply.

Narcissists are misogynists. They team up with women as mere sources of SNS (secondary narcissistic supply). The woman's chores are to accumulate past NS and release it in an orderly manner, so as to regulate the fluctuating flow of primary supply. Otherwise, cerebral narcissists are not interested in women. Most of them are non-sexual (engage in sexual acts very rarely, if at all). They hold women in contempt and abhor the thought of being really intimate with them. Usually, they choose submissive women, well below their level, to perform these functions. This leads to a vicious cycle of neediness, self-contempt ("how come I am dependent on this inferior woman") and contempt directed at the woman. Hence the abuse. When primary NS is available – the woman is hardly tolerated, as one would reluctantly pay the premium of an insurance policy.

Sound familiar?


Like I said, modern women are monsters. It is all rationalized, just like the witch trials were rationalized. You have excused yourselves from having to be good. You can wrong as much as you please. I began this thread by saying "... I have been abused ..." Is this what you do with people who have experienced trauma? Spoken with sarcasm, "Surely, you were made in the image of the Divine Physician." Complete and utter hypocrisy is yours.

I could not leave my damsel in distress because I knew what it was to cry and I knew what it was to suffer.

You all distrust this lifestyle of yours. Why is that?




tazzygirl -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/18/2011 8:20:19 PM)

Wow, I was about to ask why this got pulled to P&R.

Should die a quick death here.




Kirata -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/18/2011 9:23:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ModTwentyOne

this thread will now be in the religion forum.

That's just cruel. [:D]

K.




Kirata -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/18/2011 9:42:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tiggerspoohbear

You mean LSD?

Edited [removed] due to an attack of better judgment.

K.





Termyn8or -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/18/2011 9:52:19 PM)

What if I told y'all that LDS is as bad as LSD ?

T^T




Lucylastic -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/19/2011 8:55:42 AM)

What on earth did we do to deserve this here?? Mods thats cruel and inhuman IM calling REDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDd




tiggerspoohbear -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/19/2011 9:53:34 AM)

Lucy, we've been putting up with it for awhile in the P&RS.  Since he keeps involving religion, well, this is where it ended up.  [;)]




Lucylastic -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/19/2011 10:04:47 AM)

gah..Yes I did poke my head in once, made a comment and binned it for the llama drama, no hope there IM afraid
hugs you , but I wont be back:)
Need to call youthis week
until then, hugs




tiggerspoohbear -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/19/2011 10:22:59 AM)

Going to be here for the call. It's been awhile. [:)]




ModTwentyOne -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/19/2011 10:29:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Mods thats cruel and inhuman


And your point is...?






Lucylastic -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/19/2011 10:32:15 AM)

snicker you have a point, Sadist:)
I would probably do the same, grinssssss





InvisibleBlack -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/19/2011 10:46:27 AM)

Okay. I came to the party late but what the heck.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM
Let me begin by saying that I am a straight Dominant male.


Actually, I believe this is irrelevant to your underlying issue of dealing with the inability to find a satisfactory relationship and addressing loneliness and developing coping mechanisms. This is a universal issue and spans all humans, regardless of oritientation, gender or sexual proclivity.


quote:

 I am also one of the most extraordinary individuals who have ever lived. Yet, I am without a soul mate. Few men could ever claim to be my equal.


I will graciously grant you all of the above. Being extraordinary and without peer does not enhance one's attractiveness to the opposite sex. There are endless examples of this. Incredible scientists, artists, achievers throughout history remained single or endured horrifically troubled relationships or long strings of chaotic and brief interactions. I would argue that being slightly above the median probably does enhance one's attractiveness but being extremely superior in multiple areas more renders one unable to interact properly with the "average" individual on a romantic basis than it does make one a superstud.


quote:

Yet, I know what it is to be lonely and I have been abused by women. What I am saying is that if you are unloved, I too know what it is to be unloved.


I believe this is part of the human condition and universal. It is no more extraordinary or less extraordinary than any other person's story. The catalog of "he/she done me wrong" songs and "I'm so alone" tales is endless and spans history.


quote:

The topic of this thread is how to preserve you for that special someone.


I belive this can be addressed along two different paths - a) how to remain positive while alone and b) how to locate an acceptable prospective relationship candidate.

To the former - being positive and feeling healthy, integral and whole should not be dependent on having a partner. Moments of loneliness or minor depressions at dating failures or periods of isolation are normal but a continuous bleak despair at not being able to form a connection is indicative of some underlying problem. My suggestion would be to develop multiple areas where you are doing or achieving things that make you feel positive about yourself and that occupy your attention sufficiently that they keep your focus (i.e. do things that you enjoy and that make you feel upbeat). What these things are is unique to each individual and may require some introspection. Avoid activities that are self-negating or simply pointless distractions from the unpleasant aspects of your life. Work over time to reduce those unpleasant aspects and spend less time dwelling on them and more time addressing them. (Note that for some - posting on a BDSM dating site would fall into this category.)

To the latter - to borrow someone else's phrase: "The only consistent feature in all of your dissatisfying relationships is you." You pick the women you form attachments to. You choose to seek relationships and interactions in the places you seek them. Given there are more than eight billion people on the planet the possibility of a successful and long lasting relationship for anyone exists. If you are only engaging in unpleasant and abusive romantic interactions that is, at some level, because those are the interactions you are seeking. Review the commonalities between the people you have been attracted to and try to distill out why you found those people attractive and what the common dynamics were in your unhappy interactions. See if you can discover what it was about those interactions that you needed or wanted and why you continued to create them. If you can a handle on that, you can begin to change the underlying nature of your relationships.

Furthermore, a common problem behind difficulties finding partners is a stubborn need to have the other person conform to your preferred method of attracting a partner. Some methods appeal to a larger subset of people than others. To increase your success rate, you will have to alter your methods of approach. For example - impressing a woman with your brilliance does have an appeal but it appeals to a smaller section of women than does being devastingly physically attractive. In my experience, being confident, dynamic and self-assured has the greatest appeal to the largest segment of women - which actually gives Dominants an advantage in the dating arena if not necessarily in the succesful long-term relationship arena. Rather than expecting women to come to you because of your unique features, the onus is on you to discover how to approach them. To put it simply - you want something from someone else therefore the burden is on you to discover how to appeal to them. If they wanted to go out with you, then the requirement would be on them.

Basically, if it's not working for you - change yourself to become someone that women you find attractive would want to go out with and change your methods of pursuit to something that appeals to the women you like. The alternative is continue using your present methods and hope that statistical odds eventually result in your coming across whatever fraction of the planet's population that would appeal to.




InvisibleBlack -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/19/2011 10:50:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: ModTwentyOne

this thread will now be in the religion forum.

That's just cruel. [:D]

K.



Actually, I thought it was kind of funny. [;)]




CalifChick -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/19/2011 10:51:27 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: InvisibleBlack

Okay. I came to the party late but what the heck.



You didn't read his followup posts in the thread, didja? 

Cali




InvisibleBlack -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/19/2011 11:13:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CalifChick
You didn't read his followup posts in the thread, didja? 

Cali


You mean the parts about re-enacting the Passion of the Christ or being a witch or performing miracles? Yeah, I did. I don't have anything of value to add there. Proving or disproving divinity is outside of my area of expertise.

However, he mentioned multiple times that few were responding to the actual OP and underlying the mess, I believe he was trying to ask a valid question because at some level he realizes he needs help. I gave it a shot.




Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875