Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Does life begin at a single point?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Does life begin at a single point? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Does life begin at a single point? - 3/9/2011 6:27:04 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
There are many far more recent studies that assess sentience in levels, and conclude that at least as early as 2 months infants display activities that are more than instinctive and indicate an awareness of their interaction with their envrionment, consequences of their actions and their physical orientation relative to others.


which lends credence to the theological version


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Does life begin at a single point? - 3/9/2011 6:28:49 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: gungadin09
Is the cutoff point for *that* the same as viability? What happens to the thug who kills a fetus before 22 weeks? If they can't be charged with murder (or manslaughter), can they be charged with anything?

i'm very uneducated on this subject, but from what i understand about Roe v. Wade, viability is defined as the point that the "fetus" becomes a " human person", with a reasonable chance of surviving apart from it's mother. Because it's not known to be a "person" before viability (at least not by the current *legal* definition of the term), it's not considered to having "rights", and the mother's rights take precedence over the rights of the fetus, or the rights of the state. (The "state" may also have an interest in protecting the life of fetuses, but, for now, the Supreme Court has decided that the woman's rights to sovereignty over her reproductive system, are more important.) At viability, a fetus is considered to be a human being, and it's right to life needs to be protected.

i don't think there's any getting around it, Steven. i don't think you can define the same fetus as human in one case but not in another. And while i *totally* agree that "life" (or "humanity" for that matter) doesn't begin at a single point in time, for the sake of the law they had to define it discreetly. They can't say, humanity is something that happens continuously, by degrees, over the development of the fetus. That won't work as a legal standard for what "human life" is. They had to draw a line and say, okay, it's either on this side of the line, or it's on that side. And unfortunately that means that some thug who causes a miscarriage before 22 weeks can't be charged with murder, because you can't murder what's not considered to be a "human being" (yet...) in the first place.

i have to say, i think the law got it right. And yes, that SUCKS for anyone who's in the situation You describe. (Can the thug in that situation be charged with *any* crime at all, or just not "murder"?) But i think it's important to protect a woman's rights over her body, and you can't do that by having a dual system.

pam


the law got ti right from the standpoint of the law.

there are more than one set of circumstances however.

what you seem to be wrestling with is the "character".

When the sperm enters and merges with the egg if you will the character changes.  It is that change in character that is the source of and determines the new existence.  Hence sentient if left to its own devices.

Prior it can be said to be human life as its not a carrot or cabbage but not sentient or capable of being sentient if left to its own devices or the devices of nature.

an unfertilized egg can never be sentient and can never survive by the devices of nature.

there is a distinct and clear line in the sand on the matter.


additionally that is why I pointed out several distinctions on the use of the word life.

human life is a continuation unfertilized eggs are human life for all intents and purposes.

sentience and the capability of sentience is the character that sets apart the raw dna and glob of the egg (raw human life) from the soon to be (thinking being), the child.


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to gungadin09)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Does life begin at a single point? - 3/9/2011 9:34:27 PM   
gungadin09


Posts: 3232
Joined: 3/19/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: gungadin09
Is the cutoff point for *that* the same as viability? What happens to the thug who kills a fetus before 22 weeks? If they can't be charged with murder (or manslaughter), can they be charged with anything?


I'm asking because i know of a case where the thug (Scott Peterson) was convicted of double murder for killing his pregnant wife. She was 9 months pregnant, and Peterson was charged and convicted of 1 count each of 1st and 2nd degree murder. i'm just guessing that the cutoff point for "homocide" is at 22-24 weeks, or at viability, the same as for abortion. i would be interested to hear from anyone who actually knows whether that's true.

pam

(in reply to gungadin09)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Does life begin at a single point? - 3/9/2011 9:40:26 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
California's law...

California: California Penal Code § 187(a) says, "Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus, with malice aforethought." The words "or a fetus" were added by the legislature in 1970. The California Supreme Court later interpreted "fetus" to apply "beyond the embryonic stage of seven to eight weeks." (People v. Davis, 1994) In addition, Penal Code § 190.2(3) makes a defendant eligible for capital punishment if convicted of more than one murder, and the California Supreme Court ruled that fetal homicide is included under this provision as well (People v. Dennis, 1998).

http://www.nrlc.org/Unborn_victims/Statehomicidelaws092302.html

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to gungadin09)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Does life begin at a single point? - 3/9/2011 9:48:29 PM   
CherryNeko


Posts: 330
Joined: 12/29/2010
From: Mexico City
Status: offline
I do not think well of abortion. It sucks because unfortunately, I'm a troubled person that will hardly ever (never?) change her mind on the subject.

_____________________________

How many mornings do we have
Before this night ends?
I'm dying surrounded by white flowers
Which scatter in the sky...

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Does life begin at a single point? - 3/9/2011 9:51:53 PM   
gungadin09


Posts: 3232
Joined: 3/19/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

California's law...

California: California Penal Code § 187(a) says, "Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus, with malice aforethought." The words "or a fetus" were added by the legislature in 1970. The California Supreme Court later interpreted "fetus" to apply "beyond the embryonic stage of seven to eight weeks." (People v. Davis, 1994) In addition, Penal Code § 190.2(3) makes a defendant eligible for capital punishment if convicted of more than one murder, and the California Supreme Court ruled that fetal homicide is included under this provision as well (People v. Dennis, 1998).

http://www.nrlc.org/Unborn_victims/Statehomicidelaws092302.html


Wow, i have to say i disagree with that one. i would have thought that the term "murder" could only be applied to "human beings" (however the law defines them.) It seems inconsistent to define them one way for abortion and another for homocide. Anyway, thanks, tazzy.

pam

Edited to add: oh, wow... most of them define it at conception for murder, manslaughter, criminally negligent homocide, and assault.

< Message edited by gungadin09 -- 3/9/2011 9:58:23 PM >

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Does life begin at a single point? - 3/9/2011 9:53:04 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Cherry, I dont think well of abortions either. Its not something I could bring myself to do.. and Im grateful I didnt. My son is my pride and joy!

Having said that, I cannot, in good conscience, decide what is best for your life or your situation.

I am not pro-abortion...

I am pro-choice...

Most who support abortions are pro-choice...

and I believe every woman has that right to make that decision that is best for her.

Pro-abortion would mean that I believe every woman should have one.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to CherryNeko)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Does life begin at a single point? - 3/9/2011 9:55:11 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: gungadin09


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

California's law...

California: California Penal Code § 187(a) says, "Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus, with malice aforethought." The words "or a fetus" were added by the legislature in 1970. The California Supreme Court later interpreted "fetus" to apply "beyond the embryonic stage of seven to eight weeks." (People v. Davis, 1994) In addition, Penal Code § 190.2(3) makes a defendant eligible for capital punishment if convicted of more than one murder, and the California Supreme Court ruled that fetal homicide is included under this provision as well (People v. Dennis, 1998).

http://www.nrlc.org/Unborn_victims/Statehomicidelaws092302.html


Wow, i have to say i disagree with that one. i would have thought that the term "murder" could only be applied to "human beings" (however the law defines them.) It seems inconsistent to define them one way for abortion and another for homocide. Anyway, thanks, tazzy.

pam


I believe the operative word there is... unlawful...

"Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus, with malice aforethought."

Abortions, for the moment, are lawful procedures.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to gungadin09)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Does life begin at a single point? - 3/9/2011 10:03:45 PM   
gungadin09


Posts: 3232
Joined: 3/19/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: gungadin09
Wow, i have to say i disagree with that one. i would have thought that the term "murder" could only be applied to "human beings" (however the law defines them.) It seems inconsistent to define them one way for abortion and another for homocide. Anyway, thanks, tazzy.


I believe the operative word there is... unlawful...

"Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus, with malice aforethought."

Abortions, for the moment, are lawful procedures.


Well then, i have to say, it looks like You're wrong, Steven. Looks like in many states it is considered murder.

pam

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Does life begin at a single point? - 3/9/2011 10:16:47 PM   
CherryNeko


Posts: 330
Joined: 12/29/2010
From: Mexico City
Status: offline
Our choices should be oriented to not harming anyone. Karma and such.

I think we could only agree - and it would then be my prerrogative to do so half-heartedly - to something that prevents worse damage. If for example the mother is going to die if she has the baby, and (here I just HAD to add that she'd be a filthy coward) she decides to... end it, then I can't say I'd completely and openly plan to DESTROY her... but I'd stay away, and bear resentfulness, and quietly but melancholically disapprove.

She'd make her choices, and go on. I wouldn't do anything, but that's not something one can think of. It's not something I should think about. It's no good, absolutely no good.

I would not approve.

_____________________________

How many mornings do we have
Before this night ends?
I'm dying surrounded by white flowers
Which scatter in the sky...

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Does life begin at a single point? - 3/9/2011 10:20:18 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
wow.. just... wow

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to CherryNeko)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Does life begin at a single point? - 3/9/2011 10:50:15 PM   
TheShrew


Posts: 519
Joined: 2/15/2009
From: The state I live in? Confusion.
Status: offline
I normally try to avoid political and theological discussions, although this time, I choose to contribute. First, let me say that I do not personally care what another woman does with her body. It is her choice. That being said I have two statements ..
1. I do not advocate abortion as a form of birth control for irresponsible women.
2. If a pregnant woman were told her pregnancy would kill her, and she opted to abort, I would not think her a coward for choosing to spare her own life.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Does life begin at a single point? - 3/10/2011 4:15:33 AM   
StrangerThan


Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Explain what you mean by targets.

Look, I am catholic, my view is strictly from that perspective.


When invirtro is used, many eggs are fertilized... that is the time of conception. Eggs are implanted, and, typically, some are frozen for future use. They only keep them so long before thawing them out then incinerating them, unless the donors continue to pay for storage. But that isnt the point of this.

What would your religion call this if not murder based upon your definition?


I wanted to ask the same thing in terms of what targets meant, because herein lies the answer for me in this issue as it does so many other issues in life. Abortion is an intensely personal decision. I know that by uttering that statement someone can probably dig up a jersey girl wannabe who proudly claims she's on her 43rd abortion. I also know that neither side will let you talk in generic terms long before they offer up their showcased exceptions designed to break hearts and crack piggy banks for support.

In any case, for most,  at least that I know, it has been an intensely personal decision, one that sometimes carried sadness, sometimes carried guilt well into later years, sometimes carried a sense of relief more than anything else. But those weren't my decisions, nor related to me. I don't find it an affront to my God that I live in a society that has deemed abortion to be a legal process. I'm not responsible for society, nor for each individual within it. Whatever fallout occurs in spiritual, emotional, or legal terms is something the individual is responsible for dealing with in their own lives.

If there is an affront, it is when die hard abortion folk insist there is no life when it can live outside their body. In terms of the acorn and tree analogy you posted, this seed has sprouted. The only reason to insist life does not exist at that point is to make it easier to swallow the fact that you are ending the life of another person. For me that is the point where in the discussion of rights, the right of the child supersedes any right to destroy it.

Again, you can bat this back and forth all day, but if there has to be a point that makes sense in terms of rights, viability to me should be the point where it is no longer a choice. I don't get on the manslaughter boat either. It's murder at that point, as the choice is pre-meditated.

This question is difficult in a lot of ways. Answering it isn't a flippant thing for me. I became a father at 16. I know exactly how hard it is to be a parent when you're still a child. I know how difficult the road ahead is. I know women who 30 years after the fact, still feel remorse. I know others who act as if they've never thought twice about it. I don't think badly of either set and don't see why anything deserves the status of "Target". If there's going to be a bulls eye for me, it is the question of when. I'm not an activist. I'm not going to don bloody clothes and stand outside an abortion center, nor stand on the opposite side and tote my choice sign. What I'm going to do is choose the thing that makes sense to me, and that is the point where life can exist outside the womb. That is the point where I will give support in terms of how I vote, who I give money to, and who I will argue for.

For me, abortion is the taking of life. My personal opinions reflect how I judge myself, not others. In terms of society I think there is a point where the heated exchanges need to stop in favor of a rational discourse, and I think viability is rational. I think it makes sense. I don't feel alone in that stance either. National polls indicate support for abortion as a right, but that support drops dramatically as time passes. I think for most, there's a point where life undeniably exists.

And I think that for many, listening to the diehards on either side carries the feel of standing in a room with wild-haired extremists, with whom rational discussion is impossible and who carry enough hatred in their hearts for the other to never be able to reach a compromise.


_____________________________


--'Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform' - Mark Twain

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Does life begin at a single point? - 3/10/2011 5:33:23 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
My point in posting about frozen embryos is that people dont think along those terms. As soon as you mention them, the goal posts move.

.............

Life begins at the moment of conception.

What about frozen embryos and do you consider that murder when they are destroyed after a couple successfully uses all the stored embryos they desire?

Oh, well, life starts at implantation.

..............

That is a conversation I have had with someone recently.

If its murder to remove after the time of implantation, then surely its murder to get rid of cells that could be implanted. And while you may find the rare case of someone using abortion as birth control, that is far from the reality.

I happen to agree with you, Stranger. Viability is very much a sticking point with me.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to StrangerThan)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Does life begin at a single point? - 3/10/2011 2:44:20 PM   
Charles6682


Posts: 1820
Joined: 10/1/2007
From: Saint Pete,FL
Status: offline
This is above my pay grade!!

_____________________________

Charley aka Sub Guy

http://www.Facebook.com/SubGuy

https://Twitter.com/SubGuy6682

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 55
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Does life begin at a single point? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.141