|
tweakabelle -> RE: Impeachment? (3/23/2011 6:45:39 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
quote:
FirmhandKy
So, basically, you failed to read for understanding. You failed to read in context. You failed to read beyond your biases. And you practiced selective quotation.
Your assumptions and your characterizations are indeed false, and you are indeed straw-manning.
Please refrain from doing these things. And I would request that you put more effort in your observations and comments if you wish to engage in a conversation or debate with me.
Dear Firm
If you don't want people to think that you are saying Obama's and Bush's policies are the same, here's a simple tip:
Don't say Obama's policies are the same as Bush's four times in a single post
Got it? Not too tough is it? Or should I explain it in even simpler terms for you?
While that is sinking in, here's another tip:
Don't patronise me. Especially when you are trying to weasel your way out of a trap that is entirely of your own making. Not a good look at all.
You made your observations about Obama 4 times. While you were registering your support of inSanity's rants - something no person with even half a functional brain would be caught dead doing. Either recant or accept the criticisms I made were legitimate.
Even in your tortured efforts to squirm out of the trap you set yourself, you re-state that it is indeed your view that Obama=Bush, in bold lest anyone fail to get the message thus:
"I will say that there are plenty of other examples of Obama=Bush that I don't really need to even list them, do I?"
Blatantly confirming and emphasising the very thing you are denying! How dumb can a person get? Is this an attempt to set a new record here?
Readers by now have more than enough evidence to form their own conclusions. If you wish to be taken seriously, it helps to make serious intelligent points. I wish you well in your struggle to achieve such an ability. On this evidence, you've got a long long way to go.
tweakabelle
You are exposing quite a weakness there, tweakabelle.
I suggest you do some research on your own, and google, for example "bush and obama same policies".`
Of course, since you are in the land down under, and google changes the results based on your location and previous search history, you might not get the exact same results, but I got over 48 million hits on that search term. A review of the first two pages gave plenty of examples for my thesis, however.
If you still fail to understand my intent and words, this says more about you than it does about me.
I'd suggest you first understand the subject, and then attempt to read for comprehension rather than reading for combat.
And if you feel "condescended upon", perhaps it is because you deserve it. You don't have to continue to deserve it, but the choice is yours.
Firm
Oh dear! there's no fool like a dogged one is there?
If you are insisting, as you seem to be, that your saying at least 5 times now that Bush's and Obama's policies are the same does NOT mean you are saying Bush's and Obama's policies are the same, you qualify as moronic.
No amount of pseudo-intellectual gymnastics can alter that stark reality. And you don't even have to graduate high school to understand it.
If you somehow managed to con your way into the university where I teach, your efforts would be marked R for Re-Submit. Which is a nice way of saying please consider a career commensurate with your talents like say road sweeping or parking lot attendant.
I am not going to waste any more of my time on you.
|
|
|
|
