RE: Impeachment?

RE: Impeachment? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Sanity -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 7:37:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tweakabelle Poor thing you Sanity! I'm concerned about your mental equilibrium, Oh I know, everyone is so concerned that as soon as I post I have three replies, practically instantly. quote: not your apparently total ignorance of Islamic world. My Mideast knowledge is superior to most tweeka, and especially to yours. But again, I appreciate the grave overpowering concern you have for me quote: You sounded so worried about possible AL Quada and Iranian activities in Libya. Whereas anyone who has the slightest familiarity with the Islamic world knows that this is about as likely as Ghadaffi becoming Pope. History has proven that the Middle East abhors a power vacuum and al-Qaeda is very active there (duh). Most al-Qaeda fighters who infiltrated into post-Saddam Iraq came from Libya, and its elementary that the power vacuum should be a concern high on the agenda of those who seek to topple the existing Libyan government. quote: The solution to the stresses you tell me you're feeling about things over there lies in knowledge. Finding out for yourself that eg Iranian involvement is a laughable suggestion offers far more assurance that anything that the Kenyan's White House could tell you. Because it seems to be the case that you don't believe a single word that comes from the Kenyan - so how could that possibly set your mind at rest? Iran is known to be a force working towards destabilizing the region for their own purposes, your choosing to ignore such an obvious fact is of little concern to me, as small a concern to me as is your opinion of me.

Moonhead -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 7:41:13 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Iran is known to be a force working towards destabilizing the region for their own purposes, your choosing to ignore such an obvious fact is of little concern to me, as small a concern to me as is your opinion of me. To be fair to tweak, you have been ignoring the fact that the chimp's decision to depose one of the main balancing powers to Iran in the area was a bit irresponsible for eight years now. I suppose that's none of your concern either.

mnottertail -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 7:58:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity My Mideast knowledge is superior to most tweeka, and especially to yours. But again, I appreciate the grave overpowering concern you have for me Your Middle Eastern knowledge is second to no one, and not even third. quote: History has proven that the Middle East abhors a power vacuum and al-Qaeda is very active there (duh). Most al-Qaeda fighters who infiltrated into post-Saddam Iraq came from Libya, and its elementary that the power vacuum should be a concern high on the agenda of those who seek to topple the existing Libyan government. Yeah, usually if you off the head man, you sorta need to get another head man lined up, (that's acceptable) or one will come out of the airport bathroom like a nutsucking neocon and do it for you, his way, and that phenomenon isn't confined to just the Middle East. Your history report gets a D-. al Queda was organized, trained, and equipped as insurgent combat forces in the Soviet-Afghan war, under the offices of St. Wrinklemeat, from the Muslim Brotherhood, consisting of mostly Saudi Arabians and Yemenis, and now including Pakistanis. Your re-scribbling of History gets an F. quote: Iran is known to be a force working towards destabilizing the region for their own purposes, your choosing to ignore such an obvious fact is of little concern to me, as small a concern to me as is your opinion of me. Something W and his chickenhawks didn't take into account and set the stage for industrial strength destabilization of the Middle East (that counts for us). So they get an F in history too. (Recent and Ancient).

Sanity -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 10:54:35 AM)
Fact is, the powers that be dont have a fucking clue what sort of regime might replace Gadaffi: quote: WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Intelligence on the rebel forces battling Libyan leader Muammar GaddafiHezbollah presence but there is still no detailed picture of the emerging opposition, NATO's top operations commander said on Tuesday.

mnottertail -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 11:03:12 AM)
That's right. Fact is, the powers that were and are don't have a fucking clue what regime is gonna replace Saddam if we ever get to leave, cuz the cunts in there now aint gonna cut it. Fact is, ain't nobody got a fuckin clue who the new regime that replaces the Obama administration is gonna be. (except it ain't gonna be Palin or Bachmann).

Sanity -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 11:07:27 AM)
Fact is we invested a lot in shepherding the fragile young Iraq democracy, you conveniently ignore that. Ive yet to see a leftist answer the question, who is going to hold Libyas hand once we smash the existing power structure there.

Moonhead -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 11:37:11 AM)
Then you're either not looking very hard, or just indulging in your favourite hobby of ignoring facts that are at odds with what you wish to believe.

mnottertail -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 11:41:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Fact is we invested a lot in shepherding the fragile young Iraq democracy, you conveniently ignore that. I've yet to see a leftist answer the question, who is going to hold Libyas hand once we smash the existing power structure there. The country we smashed, we are now sheparding. No convenience to ignore, it is a very inconvenient situation. It is called a generation and a lifetime of fucked. Nutsuckers say, oh well, our treasure will be replaced by the oil in Iraq, that ain't crappenin', Hans. I have yet to see a rightist answer the question, how are we going to get out of Iraq, what the fuck are we doing there in the first place, why wouldn't nato hold their hand or the UN? Based on your guys geopolitical works to date, I find it ludicrous that you are inserting yourself into the conversation as though you have some well thought out, logical, reasonable, and correct interpretation of future events. Cuz let's face it, you guys suck when it comes to this. Lets go with that one.

slvemike4u -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 11:42:24 AM)
What would happen if we all just ignore him....I'm serious,do not engage,do not respond ,in any way shape or form.Allow him to post and post and post...all the while his only feedback coming from the like minded assholes who suckle on the same tit. Might be just the tonic for his bullshit? What about guy's...who else is in? We could go for a daily double and throw popeye into this too.

LaTigresse -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 11:43:22 AM)
Now you are talking all sensible like!

Moonhead -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 11:45:51 AM)
It's a rather good idea. Sadly there's a few more soggy biscuit boys in that circle jerk besides sanitary and poopey, and both are highly amusing (in a meanspirited "mocking the afflicted" sort of way), but yeah. It'd be interesting to see if that'd work.

slvemike4u -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 11:46:27 AM)
Lol, it doesn't happen often....but once in a while I get what is referred to,in some circles,as a moment of clarity. I am committed to this,it would be nice if others joined be....watching the discombobulation that would ensue should be a hoot and a hollar.

slvemike4u -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 11:48:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead It's a rather good idea. Sadly there's a few more soggy biscuit boys in that circle jerk besides sanitary and poopey, and both are highly amusing (in a meanspirited "mocking the afflicted" sort of way), but yeah. It'd be interesting to see if that'd work. That is exactly the point...there are plenty enough to keep us amused...and throw in the amusement of watching those guys as their bullshit gets ignored....damm,now we are having fun!

Moonhead -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 11:52:49 AM)
Cool. I'm in: I'll stick 'em both on ignore.

slvemike4u -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 12:00:52 PM)
Nah,I won't be able to do that,they are far too funny....so no ignore for me.What I am pledging is not to respond to them...in any way shape or form,no matter how stupid,how outlandish or how whiny their posts are.I will just let them be....lets see just how entertaining they can be all by their lonesome.[:D] Surely we can get some more posters to take this pledge ?

mnottertail -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 12:01:49 PM)
So, who we gonna impeach today?

Sanity -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 12:02:08 PM)
Still, quote: Ive yet to see a leftist answer the question, who is going to hold Libyas hand once we smash the existing power structure there. Leftists still scream about Iraq and Afghanistan and Afghanistan while Reagan was cic... right now though, re Libya, their silence in this regard is deafening.

Moonhead -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 12:07:12 PM)
That speaks well of your self control, but if I don't ignore Sanitary, I'm probably going to respond when he starts lying, or pretending that posts he'd prefer not to deal with don't exist. That stuff always irks me.

Sanity -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 12:07:33 PM)
Obama and the Dems ran a hysteria driven campaign against the policy of preemptive war and regime change in sovereign nations for over six years... I say, we impeach every Dem in office today, every last one of 'em for being big whiny liars and hypocrits. They believe in regime change after all, they dont give a wit about bombing 'sovereign nations' or wars for oil... Everything they squawked about for years was solely due to their BDS, Bush Derangement Syndrome Hypocrites, all quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail So, who we gonna impeach today?

mnottertail -> RE: Impeachment? (3/29/2011 12:07:41 PM)
pure bullshit, no screaming over wrinklemeat fucking up afghanistan, and playing hide the corncob in my ass with the muslim brotherhood... There is no silence, it goes like this, NATO under the auspices of the UN will hold the hand. Asked and answered in the hundreds of times, same question, same answer. Is there any new question on the table, or is this gonna be like birth certificates with the nutsuckers? So, how you going to get us out of Iraq and get our money back as was the policy of the bright and shining neocons? Your turn at the microphone, (and don't fuck it up like Reagan did).

Page: << < prev 28 29 [30] 31 32 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875