RE: Impeachment?

RE: Impeachment? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Moonhead -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 7:58:16 AM)
There's also the Legion of Superheroes (Foreskin Lad, Medication Boy, Cartoon Girl and Independent Boy): I don't think any of them are lefties...

mnottertail -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 7:58:53 AM)
and he who shall not be named?

rulemylife -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 8:00:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead quote: ORIGINAL: TreasureKY So do I understand you correctly... you won't directly engage Sanity... but you have no problem joining in with others deriding him? If so, I find that sad. Dissing people behind their backs is part of what internet messageboards are all about. I'm surprised you haven't noticed that. No, I have a problem with that too. And I will admit to having done it on occasion but I'm not proud of it. If something needs to be said it should be said to the person directly. Wow ,it seems to me one simple little post s garnering an awful lot of attention. a)I have said enough things,enough times to the poster in question,that any charge of hypocrisy is patently ridiculous. b) As I said earlier this is a voluntary move on my part to save the rest of the board from the sort of cyclical posting that sanity and I often find ourselves in. c) various posters block other posters....that does not preclude them from commenting on some post when another quotes that post.How is what I did different.. Now if others feel I am somehow not living up to my voluntary decision to avoid direct contact with sanity and popeye I'm sorry about that,but I learned a long long time ago that pleasing everybody is not my job,and not at all important to me So I will continue to go about this as I see fit and for as long as I believe it is the best course. Finally ,though I plucked RML's post to tag this on....this is not directed specifically at what you posted ...it is a general reply to the whole conversation. And in turn Mike, I was not directing that at you, just agreeing with the general idea that we should address each other directly.

Moonhead -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 8:00:52 AM)
He who must not be named: never invoke forces that you cannot dispel.

mnottertail -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 8:03:44 AM)
in the name of CM statute 7.3.1 and the venerated St. Wrinklemeat. Amen.

Moonhead -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 8:05:35 AM)
Never bring up anything that you can't put back down: on this Lovecraft, Crowley and even the "Kaos Magick" bullshitters are agreed.

mnottertail -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 8:13:04 AM)
What does the right Rev. Sun Myung Moon say?

Lucylastic -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 8:14:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail in the name of CM statute 7.3.1 and the venerated St. Wrinklemeat. Amen. I still squeal at that invocation, it tickled me for months and months

mnottertail -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 8:18:20 AM)
he came back at me once and asked me what the significance of that IP was.......(which was cute in its profound dishonesty).

Moonhead -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 8:25:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail What does the right Rev. Sun Myung Moon say? "Buy low, sell high."

slvemike4u -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 8:37:36 AM)
Sound advice moon.... Now,in an effort to get back on track.....How are the impeachment hearings going ?[:D]

Moonhead -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 8:42:52 AM)
I think they're having trouble finding an excuse to impeach.

mnottertail -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 8:46:57 AM)
You are calling upon even darker forces than we have ever had enter our minds. Prepare yourself for the washers and dowels demonstration of both physical and codified laws in action in a vast space-time continuum likeness surpassing the glory and grandeur that was Rome, even unto the mummified gut bacteria of the great Pharaoh Amenhotep where we will study the etymology of the word impeachment.

slvemike4u -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 8:49:58 AM)
You are almost as funny as I.....,you show great promise.[:D] keep it up,I will let you know when you get there [:D]

Lucylastic -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 8:54:03 AM)
Well According to Beck, they could be impeaching him for "encouraging evil in the Middle East" and leading the world to want to attack Israel. Glenn Beck said that the Obama administration was "encouraging evil in the Middle East" and leading the world to want to attack Israel. Speaking on his Monday show, Beck was clearly unhappy with the war in Libya, Beck said that, by supporting the Libyan opposition, the U.S. was sending a dangerous message about Israel. "The world is being led to the water that Israel is the evil one and it's about to drink," he said. "Don't drink that water." Beck went on to say that the Obama administration is "siding with the wrong side. They are standing against good and encouraging evil in the Middle East. We are reprimanding the nation that is as flawed as we are protecting the aggressors. We're protecting the killers and the terrorists." Theres video..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aM0DjOC74zI&feature=player_embedded

mnottertail -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 8:55:40 AM)
that is some fuckin shakey legal ground at first blush. (there will not be a second).

Moonhead -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 9:21:13 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Crybaby We are reprimanding the nation that is as flawed as we are protecting the aggressors. We're protecting the killers and the terrorists. What, you mean like you were when you were accusing Qatar (one of the few Arab countries where women have basic human rights) of being an honorary member of the Axis of Evil over Al Jazzera broadcasting a couple of Osama bin Laden's home videos? (A response to Glenn "body language of a stroke victim" Beck, not Lucy. I'd better make sure that's clear in case somebody misses the changed attribution of the quotation...)

FirmhandKY -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 10:02:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote: ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY You know mike, I thought you had a pretty good idea, about not responding to Sanity, if you couldn't stomach him. At the least, it would reduce the number of insulting (and often incoherent) post by a large percentage by the left-of-center crowd. Yet, here you are again, already ... [:)] Firm Really? By the left-of-center crowd? Are you forgetting the right-of-center crowd like the cucky twins and several others? You are saying that the right-of-center crowd constantly straw-mans and insults Sanity? Firm

Moonhead -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 10:48:21 AM)
Are you saying that anything Sanity comes out with is worth bothering with? That's the obvious corollary to your statement, after all. Still, at least that's reassured me that I don't have to take your opinions any more seriously than you do mine.

mnottertail -> RE: Impeachment? (3/30/2011 10:49:11 AM)
he may be insulted, god knows he's on the case constantly, but the biggest purveyor of strawmans is not eminating from the left when I see it.

Page: << < prev 30 31 32 [33] 34 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125