Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore?

Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

mnottertail -> Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 6:30:00 AM)
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/04/07/libya.war/index.html?hpt=T2 American ADD, more concerned about the Donald now. Somebody lay the accuracy propaganda on me again.

Lucylastic -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 6:32:12 AM)
Because Obama pulled back and now NATO are "in charge" there's no use caring if they cant hit the Pres with their ire Fuck the people of Libya, they were unimportant to the right, they cant carry on the warmonger rant now and they are sulking

slvemike4u -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 6:41:03 AM)
Lucy has it pegged,there is no longer political profit to be had...so they have moved on.Though I do have a prediction,one I hope does not come to pass,should Qaddafi somehow survive this episode...those on the right will be here telling us how weak and indecisive this President is....and how a more experienced President would have committed overwhelming force to the struggle and toppled Qaddafi. shrugs what are you going to do.[8\|]

flcouple2009 -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 6:52:01 AM)
You mean in the same manner that a poster of Drudge reports was screaming that Obama was doing nothing and the rebels would all be dead. Then once the missiles started flying was wondering why we were involved?

mnottertail -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 6:52:50 AM)
No, he said they were all dead. Let's be perfectly punctillious about that.

popeye1250 -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 7:00:07 AM)
Or could it be the "genocide" that,.....never materialized? Oh,.....it "could" happen,..... couldn't it? Or maybe that Oblunder was lying when he made that speech and said that there'd be no "boots on the ground" when in fact there (had) been "boots on the ground" for weeks before he made "The Speech."

slvemike4u -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 7:06:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 You mean in the same manner that a poster of Drudge reports was screaming that Obama was doing nothing and the rebels would all be dead. Then once the missiles started flying was wondering why we were involved? Yep,that about sums it up [:)]

TheHeretic -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 7:06:45 AM)
Command and control by committee seems to be cruising along exactly as well as can be expected, Ron.

slvemike4u -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 7:09:05 AM)
Yes,it was so much smoother when these decisions were made by "gut feelings".[8\|] Just how much blood and treasure was squandered by taking that route?

mnottertail -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 7:20:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic Command and control by committee seems to be cruising along exactly as well as can be expected, Ron. Yeah, that of, by and for the people thing, rather than a demagoguery by one nutsucking ideologue is almost a new concept all over again.

tweakabelle -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 7:24:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 Or could it be the "genocide" that,.....never materialized? Oh,.....it "could" happen,..... couldn't it? Or maybe that Oblunder was lying when he made that speech and said that there'd be no "boots on the ground" when in fact there (had) been "boots on the ground" for weeks before he made "The Speech." [sm=beatdeadhorse.gif]

slvemike4u -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 7:33:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tweakabelle quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 Or could it be the "genocide" that,.....never materialized? Oh,.....it "could" happen,..... couldn't it? Or maybe that Oblunder was lying when he made that speech and said that there'd be no "boots on the ground" when in fact there (had) been "boots on the ground" for weeks before he made "The Speech." [sm=beatdeadhorse.gif] Those air strikes and the Tomahawk missile didn't have anything to do with halting the possible "genocide".....nah,that couldn't be possible,could it?

tweakabelle -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 8:13:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u Those air strikes and the Tomahawk missile didn't have anything to do with halting the possible "genocide".....nah,that couldn't be possible,could it? Typical libtard nonsense trying to connect two completely unrelated events

mnottertail -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 8:29:53 AM)
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/04/06/libya.gadhafi.image/index.html?hpt=C1 I see that there was a large capitalistic right wing contingent, right up to the oval office doing plugs for this guy....and here all the nutsuckers were telling us, it wasn't me....

Lucylastic -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 8:33:29 AM)
I was about to post that, but you beat me to it Ron makes a lot of sense on top of everything else :)

mnottertail -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 8:37:39 AM)
Well, I just hope that some of our more reasoned right posters here don't get hurt trying to dodge getting thrown under the bus while at the same time misdirecting everything they said in light of easily knowable actual facts (which really really fucks them up, and I don't understand why they don't get it still) at the same time.

thishereboi -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 9:11:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Because Obama pulled back and now NATO are "in charge" there's no use caring if they cant hit the Pres with their ire Fuck the people of Libya, they were unimportant to the right, they cant carry on the warmonger rant now and they are sulking Or they are sitting around waiting for another thread on how pathetic everyone on the right is. My guess is, they won't wait long.

mnottertail -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 9:13:35 AM)
Yup, that goes either way on any given day.

Lucylastic -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 9:18:20 AM)
you havent read the one about the pumping gas have you? If the cap fits, wear it you ignore 99% of the bullshit against the libs, or you pretend to ignore them, but are so quick to pounce on any response. look around you, six of one and half a dozen of the other. Why havent you contributed a thought?

popeye1250 -> RE: Libya --- why isn't this of interest anymore? (4/7/2011 9:29:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u quote: ORIGINAL: tweakabelle quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 Or could it be the "genocide" that,.....never materialized? Oh,.....it "could" happen,..... couldn't it? Or maybe that Oblunder was lying when he made that speech and said that there'd be no "boots on the ground" when in fact there (had) been "boots on the ground" for weeks before he made "The Speech." [sm=beatdeadhorse.gif] Those air strikes and the Tomahawk missile didn't have anything to do with halting the possible "genocide".....nah,that couldn't be possible,could it? Oh, so Oblunder uses the word "genocide" referring to Libya and we here in the U.S. are supposed to be concerned? It has nothing to do with "oil" though, does it? What word or term did Clinton use to get us involved in Bosnia/ Kosovo when we shouldn't have been?

Page: [1] 2 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625