RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master



Message


MasterTygr -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/12/2011 9:43:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

Welcome to collarme.

The comments indeed showed something of a lack of respect.  However, when someone defines themself solely by his or her kinks, that's the usual response.



Thank you for the first sincere welcome I have yet encountered on these forums. :P  Was it something I said?!  xD jk xD

To me it seems unfortunate that the replies in this topic only defend their owners harsh comments that unnecessarily criticize the honesty of the original topic creator. 

And then I came upon a realization that I hadn't earlier.  It is possible that the original poster doesn't mind and I'll go so far as suggest that he enjoys the attention that these mean comments contain.  o.O




DarkSteven -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/12/2011 10:00:06 PM)

You deserved a welcome.  You have a sense of humor and seem to have a balanced, open mind.  That said, I ask you to put a pic of some overweight dude on your profile so you do not steal all the wimmins here that are rightfully mine.




MasterTygr -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/12/2011 10:10:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

You deserved a welcome.  You have a sense of humor and seem to have a balanced, open mind.  That said, I ask you to put a pic of some overweight dude on your profile so you do not steal all the wimmins here that are rightfully mine.



LOL!  Seems as I won't need to...I don't really get a second chance at first impressions and I kinda blew that o.O
They stalkin my profile man!  Trying to dig up dirt on meeee

"the 22 year old Master for the swoosh and the score!" ~LadyPact

They gotta try harder XD
Is 22 a new insult that I am not aware of?




dreamerdreaming -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/12/2011 10:16:36 PM)

I'm copying this reply to both your threads, because one will presumably be deleted by the mods.

I don't care about your dick. And if you were serving me, I still wouldn't care about it- about its size, or whether you can keep it up. That has no bearing on my satisfaction.

Your willing obedience is all I'd care about, if you served me. I'd have you get me off with your hands, or have you watch me do myself while you suck my toes. Whatever. I'd make sure I got off, if I wanted to- whether by your hand or my own.

There. Is that the wank material you were hoping for, OP? [8|]




MistressRosalyn -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/12/2011 10:16:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterTygr
WHOLIA!  You've done it!  You are now free to indulge in the epic experience of exploring content that disproves your statements regarding internet communities!


Not to be overly critical Sweet Cheeks, but unless you have invented a "wholia" new word, I imagine that the word you were looking for is "voila!". Not viola (a flower), not wallah (such as a chai wallah), or any of the multitude that people make up each and every day, but the Anglicization of the French exclamation.

You are very well "spoken" in your posts, so I imagine that you will be happy to be corrected at such an early age, the lesson never to be forgotten the rest of your life.

BTW, nice bod.

Oh, and so I don't get Mod-spanked...

OP, Are you into the humiliation aspect of having a small cock and being fat? Some might enjoy making use of you, but I would not.

DS, you are still the Dom o' Desire for all subs (and a few Dommes) far and wide!




YoungBlondeSlave -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/12/2011 10:18:21 PM)

OP If all you see yourself as is an extention of your (self-reported) dysfunctional sexual organ then you're going to get slammed. Especially since you've posted the same in "Ask a Mistress". If you're doing all of this just so you get your jollies off because you like to be humiliated then this is a crappy way to do it. I haven't read your profile so I don't know if you have these desires posted there as well. But, as others have mentioned, we are more than kinks here. One would hope that you see yourself in the same manner.

Best of luck to you in any event.


quote:

That said, I ask you to put a pic of some overweight dude on your profile so you do not steal all the wimmins here that are rightfully mine.


Steven, you're adorable when you feign jealousy.

MTyger, it's nice of you to come to his defense. He could use someone in his corner. And I second Steven's welcome. Hope you enjoy it here on the boards and that you find lots of luck here too.




MasterTygr -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/12/2011 10:23:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressRosalyn

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterTygr
WHOLIA!


Not to be overly critical Sweet Cheeks, but unless you have invented a "wholia" new word, I imagine that the word you were looking for is "voila!".


Dang...!  Actually I WAS staring at that wondering if I had invented a new word!  thanks :)  With the current situation that had arisen earlier I found myself more focused on the structure of my replies rather than the strange onomatopoeia that I came up with. :P




MasterTygr -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/12/2011 10:26:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: YoungBlondeSlave
And I second Steven's welcome. Hope you enjoy it here on the boards and that you find lots of luck here too.



haha, thank you :)

I'm really starting to enjoy the community here! 




lindave -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/12/2011 10:51:14 PM)

Thank you, Bita Truble, I was looking for an opinion, and you gave me one.




LadyPact -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/12/2011 11:56:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterTygr

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

Welcome to collarme.

The comments indeed showed something of a lack of respect.  However, when someone defines themself solely by his or her kinks, that's the usual response.



Thank you for the first sincere welcome I have yet encountered on these forums. :P  Was it something I said?!  xD jk xD

To me it seems unfortunate that the replies in this topic only defend their owners harsh comments that unnecessarily criticize the honesty of the original topic creator. 

And then I came upon a realization that I hadn't earlier.  It is possible that the original poster doesn't mind and I'll go so far as suggest that he enjoys the attention that these mean comments contain.  o.O

Frankly, you still haven't.  Could that be because you, like most of the people here, honestly don't care about the size of some guy's dick?  How about the fact that someone twice your age (at least) doesn't have the social grace in what you want to define as "a community" to know any better than to ask perfect strangers questions about his genitalia?

The only people who are actually going to care about the size, function, or anything else about the OP's pecker are the ones that he is intimately involved with.  It doesn't matter one iota what people on a website think.




GreedyTop -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/13/2011 12:08:22 AM)

*adores LadyP*

yeah yeah, I know, THERE'S a newsflash!




MasterTygr -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/13/2011 12:34:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterTygr
And then I came upon a realization that I hadn't earlier.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
Frankly, you still haven't. 

I have...?  You even quoted me on it!  You went so far as to make the text red.
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
Could that be because you, like most of the people here, honestly don't care about the size of some guy's dick?  How about the fact that someone twice your age (at least) doesn't have the social grace in what you want to define as "a community" to know any better than to ask perfect strangers questions about his genitalia?

The only people who are actually going to care about the size, function, or anything else about the OP's pecker are the ones that he is intimately involved with.  It doesn't matter one iota what people on a website think.



Then why are we still here in his thread posting comments that continue to acknowledge the presence of and making further reference to his penis's size, function, or anything else?  (sounds like caring)  An awful lot of people have mentioned it now, and that's fact.  Going on a tangent and arguing otherwise is a rather mute point as reality and irreputable facts dictate otherwise.  Unless of course we are all intimately involved with him.  At which point you would be correct with your response.  No one (who isn't intimately involved with him) cares, has cared, ever gave recognition, nor wrote text discussing any facet of this mans penis.




MasterTygr -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/13/2011 12:35:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

*adores LadyP*

yeah yeah, I know, THERE'S a newsflash!


Like Charlie Sheen I'm winning




GreedyTop -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/13/2011 12:41:17 AM)

um... ok?




MasterTygr -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/13/2011 12:42:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

um... ok?


Please continue.  If your up for friendly banter within the community I'm ready ;)




GreedyTop -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/13/2011 12:45:01 AM)

again with the word community...  

and I am clueless what your last post had to do with my comment about LadyP.




MasterTygr -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/13/2011 12:51:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop
again with the word community...  

I'm doing it on purpose.  That's the point of my sardonic humor.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop
and I am clueless what your last post had to do with my comment about LadyP.

I was inviting you to come and play ;)




GreedyTop -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/13/2011 12:59:54 AM)

um..ok?




MasterTygr -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/13/2011 1:08:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

um..ok?


This is where your "Posts: 37978" comes from doesn't it?




GreedyTop -> RE: Subs with small, dysfunctional cocks. (4/13/2011 1:13:42 AM)

if you were only making sense, perhaps I could decipher what you are trying to say.

Granted, I am sleepy..  but the 'invite you in' comment, combined with this last one simply leave me baffled.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875