Arpig
Posts: 9930
Joined: 1/3/2006 From: Increasingly further from reality Status: offline
|
quote:
I.personally can not take the idea of personal freedom that far Arpig,the knowledge of babies born with addictions is just too painful to take that particular leap.The current hell they are born into...the continuing health issues they are cosigned to suffer is, once again ,for me just a "bridge too far". Unfortunately, it isn't a question of going to far or not. If a woman has the right to control her own body for the purposes of aborting a fetus, then she has the right to control it period. The fact that the right can be abused with horrible consequences is, to use hannah lynn's favourite phrase, irrelevant to the question of the right's existence. Abuse of the right should bring consequences. Giving birth to a crack baby should have legal repercussions, the child has been abused in a terrible way. But that doesn't change the basic premise of the OP. I don't like it any more than you do, mike, but there really is no way around it. Either a woman has the right to control her body or she doesn't. I'm not in favour of half measures when it comes to one's individual rights. Perhaps the question we should really be asking is this: Does a person have the right to control their own body?
_____________________________
Big man! Pig Man! Ha Ha...Charade you are! Why do they leave out the letter b on "Garage Sale" signs? CM's #1 All-Time Also-Ran
|