tazzygirl -> RE: "A woman has the right to do what she wants with her own body" (4/16/2011 9:44:59 PM)
|
quote:
Yes. Compared to just about everything else in the federal budget, welfare babies are a drop in the bucket. Last year, PP prevented about 600,000 pregnancies. 600,000 * 222,000 = $133,200,200 The number of abortions PP performed last year... 324,008 * 222,000 = 71,929,776 For a grand total of... 205,129,976 Not a bad sum of money... however... that figure of 222,000 doesnt include quite a bit... Expenditures estimated in this study consisted of direct parental expenses made on children through age 17 for seven major budgetary components. These expenditures exclude costs related to prenatal health care. The estimates do not include all government expenditures on children. Examples of excluded expenses would be public education, Medicaid, and subsidized school meals. The actual expenditures on children (by parents and the government), therefore, would be higher than reported in this study, especially for children in the lowest income group. Expenditures on children made by people not in the household, such as grandparents and other relatives, were also not factored in. Indirect costs involved in child rearing were not included in the estimates. Although these costs are typically more difficult to measure than direct expenditures, they may be substantial. The time involved in rearing children is considerable and has a cost attached to it. A recent study found that the imputed value of parental time spent on children exceeded the direct cash expenditures on them (Folbre, 2008). In addition, to care for children, current earnings and future career opportunities may be diminished because of job choice or reduced time in the labor force for one or both parents. These situations also have a cost attached to them. http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/Publications/CRC/crc2009.pdf There are many factors associated with just the financial aspect of raising a child. To say its minimal is misleading at best.
|
|
|
|