Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: the royal wedding


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: the royal wedding Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: the royal wedding - 4/30/2011 7:08:08 AM   
GreedyTop


Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline
well, it wasnt you wearing it, so tough shit.

_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 121
RE: the royal wedding - 4/30/2011 7:14:24 AM   
Phoenixpower


Posts: 8098
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

saw bits of the wedding tonight..

Kates dress was STUNNING, and the recpetion dress was, as well.

Personally, I think that this marriage may very well usher in a new era/style of Monarchy....  Both William and Kate are products not only of their parents, but also the WORLD in which they live.  I think their style of monarchy will be drastically different from any seen before.

IMO, of course...


How would I file a formal complaint over this?  I am not happy with the dress.



Just send it to the queen

_____________________________

RIP 08-09-07

The PAST is history, the FUTURE a mystery, NOW is a gift - that's why it's called the PRESENT

www.butyoudontlooksick.com/navigation/BYDLS-TheSpoonTheory.pdf

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 122
RE: the royal wedding - 4/30/2011 3:06:13 PM   
DeviantlyD


Posts: 4375
Joined: 5/26/2007
From: Hawai`i
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Lets take-  Oprah- with all of her money she still needs 20 minutes of commercials in an hour?



Uhm...that isn't a serious question, right? I mean...surely you know the answer to your own question?

It isn't Oprah who "needs" the commercial time, it is each station that runs her show. They essentially buy it from her and recoup the money from the advertisers who pay them to air their commercials. Even if Oprah gave her show away, stations would still sell advertising for it. They would only air her show commercial free if she were to pay them to air it and that would be quite the cost.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 123
RE: the royal wedding - 4/30/2011 3:14:36 PM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline
I'm still reeling from James Middleton's reading from Romans 12: 1-2, 9-18. It was flawless and beautiful. He did a perfect job and was very moving. It's something I could listen to forever.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/royal-wedding-watch/post/james-middleton-gives-bible-reading-at-royal-wedding/2011/04/28/AFi6JSCF_blog.html

(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 124
RE: the royal wedding - 4/30/2011 4:28:06 PM   
Phoenixpower


Posts: 8098
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Lets take-  Oprah- with all of her money she still needs 20 minutes of commercials in an hour?



Uhm...that isn't a serious question, right? I mean...surely you know the answer to your own question?

It isn't Oprah who "needs" the commercial time, it is each station that runs her show. They essentially buy it from her and recoup the money from the advertisers who pay them to air their commercials. Even if Oprah gave her show away, stations would still sell advertising for it. They would only air her show commercial free if she were to pay them to air it and that would be quite the cost.



And if the station isn't the one who needs the money then australians can pay the bill for the 300 guests she invited to australia

http://tvnz.co.nz/entertainment-news/oprah-s-all-expenses-paid-trip-infuriates-aussies-3780872

_____________________________

RIP 08-09-07

The PAST is history, the FUTURE a mystery, NOW is a gift - that's why it's called the PRESENT

www.butyoudontlooksick.com/navigation/BYDLS-TheSpoonTheory.pdf

(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 125
RE: the royal wedding - 4/30/2011 4:58:30 PM   
DeviantlyD


Posts: 4375
Joined: 5/26/2007
From: Hawai`i
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phoenixpower


quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Lets take-  Oprah- with all of her money she still needs 20 minutes of commercials in an hour?



Uhm...that isn't a serious question, right? I mean...surely you know the answer to your own question?

It isn't Oprah who "needs" the commercial time, it is each station that runs her show. They essentially buy it from her and recoup the money from the advertisers who pay them to air their commercials. Even if Oprah gave her show away, stations would still sell advertising for it. They would only air her show commercial free if she were to pay them to air it and that would be quite the cost.



And if the station isn't the one who needs the money then australians can pay the bill for the 300 guests she invited to australia

http://tvnz.co.nz/entertainment-news/oprah-s-all-expenses-paid-trip-infuriates-aussies-3780872


Excuse me, how does one thing have anything to do with the other?

Since this thread is getting derailed, let me get it back on track. :)

Official Royal Wedding Photos

(in reply to Phoenixpower)
Profile   Post #: 126
RE: the royal wedding - 5/1/2011 9:09:37 AM   
ranja


Posts: 2111
Joined: 11/1/2007
Status: offline
FR
i don't much understand the anti-royalist people
i think they are misguided jealous party poopers

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 127
RE: the royal wedding - 5/1/2011 9:17:12 AM   
myotherself


Posts: 7157
Joined: 3/9/2006
From: The cold bit of the UK
Status: offline
It was two rich kids being married.

Her dress was lovely. The best man looked so uncomfortable it was unreal. The queen fell asleep during the service, which was worth a giggle.

That's it. Let them get on with their lives, and we'll get on with ours until the next pair of celebs tie the knot.

_____________________________

There's nowt so queer as folk


(in reply to ranja)
Profile   Post #: 128
RE: the royal wedding - 5/1/2011 10:04:30 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Lets take-  Oprah- with all of her money she still needs 20 minutes of commercials in an hour?



Uhm...that isn't a serious question, right? I mean...surely you know the answer to your own question?

It isn't Oprah who "needs" the commercial time, it is each station that runs her show. They essentially buy it from her and recoup the money from the advertisers who pay them to air their commercials. Even if Oprah gave her show away, stations would still sell advertising for it. They would only air her show commercial free if she were to pay them to air it and that would be quite the cost.



Yes it is serious.   In the 70s there were not nearly as many commercials per hour.  The saturation has made it so the no one even looks anymore.  If there were less, maybe people would look.

Huff had pics of newspapers around the world- more then 1/2 of them had ads on the front page.

The goal is to make the net just like TV.  So this is relevant.  Google ads now on pics.  

And look at the TV picture- how cluttered it is with noise, teasers, promos DURING THE SHOW.

We really are a slothful and wanton disgusting excuse as a culture.  We glorify mediocrity when we could do better.... and this wedding based on the coverage I seen-  makes it all into a 24 hour infomercial.  Yuck.

(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 129
RE: the royal wedding - 5/1/2011 11:44:43 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ranja

FR
i don't much understand the anti-royalist people
i think they are misguided jealous party poopers



Brilliant! You got all us non-royalists in one, Ranja. Wow!

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to ranja)
Profile   Post #: 130
RE: the royal wedding - 5/1/2011 11:49:00 AM   
agirl


Posts: 4530
Joined: 6/14/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

dammit I succumbed to watching the ceremony to the kiss on the balcony.
damn its good to see my ex- fellow countrymen enjoying themselves and the couple look wonderfully happy
all the bad the good and the ugly staved off for a few hours of fantasy, majesty, pomp and the pagentry
Jerusalem made me cry my eyes out
Yeah, worth it for me
Grumpy Old Lady
now back to work


I listened and half-watched the scenes beforehand (admittedly I was interested in the weather and whether I had to worry about our banjos getting pissed on or not) and it's always fun to see the lengths people go to, to be involved in a super occasion.........even though I find it slightly bemusing when they've FLOWN in, or slept on the streets overnight! (Having said that, I might very well do the same for something I'm passionate about, so more power to their elbow)

I can't imagine flying across the world to take part in anything similar, like the many other people from all over the world did. I really haven't a care in the world about how much it cost, who paid for what, how rich they are, and whether and what kind of King Wills may or may not be. It's not important to me, nor is political slant on it.

I saw nothing of the wedding at all, but M and I did have a flip through a few sites on google and saw the highlights much later on after we'd finished playing at our street party. Much like most weddings, that was all we needed.

We didn't get to see Sarah's daughter's horrid hat, or all the amusing things that make a family wedding worth trawling through.

The best parts of any wedding in OUR family, are all the cringy bits. You want it all to go well, but I'm afraid those bits, are the ones that are never forgotten because they stop it being a dry old affair that you can't be fagged to look back on, or would be bored stupid watching, in time to come.
(I'd never be without Aunty Dolly's HIDEOUS hat with the single, huge flower bobbing away as she cradled every baby within arm's reach to her ample bosom.)

We had a fantastic street party, bunting, balloons, magicians, face painting, kids with cake-crumbs round their faces, men in tiara's with masks of the bride, along with makeshift wedding dresses stapled on and a bit'o' live music supplied by *yours truly* and anyone else that played accoustically.

You wouldn't have been able to tell who cared a jot about the wedding ITSELF...just as you wouldn't know what political persuasion anyone was either.

It wasn't the wedding of *rich people* (that's quite a non-event)...It wasn't the wedding of some celebrity (equally boring for most of us here). It was, whether you like it or not, the wedding of the future King. It doesn't matter much to me what shape the monarchy takes in the future but straddling sides of the *class divide* personally.....I wish them ALL peace and comfort in their interactions.

(Jerusalem always makes me tear-up, too)

agirl














_____________________________

See how easy it can be?

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 131
RE: the royal wedding - 5/1/2011 12:13:55 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
^ dont worry- their next wedding will be better.

(in reply to agirl)
Profile   Post #: 132
RE: the royal wedding - 5/1/2011 12:35:15 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

saw bits of the wedding tonight..

Kates dress was STUNNING, and the recpetion dress was, as well.

Personally, I think that this marriage may very well usher in a new era/style of Monarchy....  Both William and Kate are products not only of their parents, but also the WORLD in which they live.  I think their style of monarchy will be drastically different from any seen before.

IMO, of course...


I wasnt all that impressed with her dresses, not my style. I would describe them and her present dress style as "dignified" which of course they now have to be as she will be the future Queen at some point. No more sexy see thru dresses lol

They are, imo, already bringing dignity back to the monarchy, dignity but with real love, admiration, respect for each other. They look very happy. I am sure there will be a few bumps along the way but I think they will weather them well.

(in reply to GreedyTop)
Profile   Post #: 133
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: the royal wedding Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078