iliv2servher
Posts: 228
Joined: 5/17/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: txpet It DOES all depend on the defintion of vanilla. i'm finding a difficulty in discussing a lot of things because of defintions and words getting in the way. For instance ... i like pain but i don't like things that are painful. The way i use the word painful is whatever is beyond my pain threshold. Makes things confusing. There is sex that is not oral, not anal, not BDSM and not missionary .. is that vanilla? ::smile: Why not just say, "I like pain, but I do have limits."? It's just a matter of finding a different way to explain it, then hopefully the person with whom you are involved will understand. After talking with a number of people in the scene, I've come to the conclusion that you actually have to initiate a discussion period with them before you can expect them to always know what you are talking about. Here on the CM Forums, people are a bit more sophisticated than someone who just happens to pop into a munch for the first time. I think that the consensus opinion of what is considered to be "vanilla sex" is usually defined by popular useage of the time. For instance, oral sex wasn't as popular or mainstream until Bill Clinton proclaimed that he didn't have sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky. In his view, or in his defense, he inferred that he didn't think that oral sex was the same as having sexual relations. So, does that mean that oral sex is now in the catagory of vanilla? Probably. Leave it to our political leaders to make policy decisions and put their own spin on things. quote:
"deviant" "straight sex" These still are not defined, and possibly can not be. Everything is subjective. ::smile: By Jove, I think you've got it! *LOL* Yes, I agree that everything is subjective.
_____________________________
Dating sucks!
|