SorceressJ
Posts: 2968
Joined: 7/24/2010 Status: offline
|
I have only known two Dominants intimately, and I am married to the One. The other was a douche who stole my stuff, including meds out of my pocketbook, and dumped me and a dependant child on near-strangers without warning so he could bail to another state and not look back. After several years and having found true happiness with the One I was meant for, this same douche has the gall to email me and talk about how he did me a favor and that the good life I had now was thanx to him. (NOT) At any rate, without having read the rest of the posts here and not knowing whether generalizations such as mine are what was called for in this case, I will say that it seems pretty academic to me, that Dominant-types should have the same or similar wide range of wildly random human imperfections and such. I know a few Dominant posters on these boards who would almost certainly agree, even those who deserve the 'title' as opposed to the majority who do not. This is meant to insinuate no one and nothing other than my own personal opinions. YMMV. Rock on. )O( EDITED to replace a dropped adverb..
< Message edited by SorceressJ -- 5/23/2011 5:43:38 PM >
_____________________________
Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc. <93>)O(
|