subrob1967
Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Owner59 The sanitizers point is that b/c bush/chaney got away with war crimes,they never really did them. quote:
ORIGINAL: gungadin09 Am i just really naive? How can we openly assassinate another country's leader (good or bad) without having the country declare war on us? The answer would be no. The policy of killing leaders was abandoned by the us decades ago.The bushies and neo-cons occasionally defend it or call for it(what in hitler were killed early,Saddam,etc.) but in general, we don`t do it,whether we`ve declared war or not. And for good practical reasons,not just moral ones. Non-combatants getting killed is going to happen.It`s what happened here.If Ghadafi really was concerned about his kin he`d moved them out weeks ago.Maybe Ghadafi thought he had/has the upper hand and didn`t need to.His mistake.I don`t have an once of sympathy for that terrorist/friend-of-big-oil. I believe we should follow a policy of trying our best not to kill non-combs.Our main policy changes in Afghanistan after President Obama took command were designed to lower the un-acceptably high number of civilian/non-combatant deaths there.Those numbers are way down thought it still does happen. Ghadafi will/has also use(d) the usual school/library/hospital collateral damage to gain sympathy."Look at what the bad NATO planes did the to Libya`s little bunny rabbits and kittens!!" The question over whether we call this a war or not is a symantics game by cons, looking to dumb down the arguement. President Obama`s critics seem really anxious to call this involvement a mistake but somehow can`t seem to explain why. It`s the moral equivatant of chiding and even blaming a man, for running into a burning building to save a family,saying it`s not his business. You really are stupid, aren't you? The why is, Libya has done nothing to attack the U.S. since Lockerbie under Reagan. As for defending Bush, show me one post where I said invading Iraq was a good decision, or defended Quadaffi, Ghadaffi, Gadaffi, or however he's spelling it these days. My post had nothing to do with Bush, and EVERYTHING to do with the left's ongoing hypocrisy where it comes to President Obama. You guys wanted your war for Oil, well, here it is, only it's your guy who's the perpetrator, not Bushie, and it won't be the US who benefits, after all, it's his energy secretary who wants to see $10 a gallon gas...
|