juliaoceania
Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006 From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow Status: offline
|
quote:
Really? You are aware that reprisals are legal under the war conventions, right? We actually have the wartime right of bombing and killing a community of 3000 civilian Al-Qaida supporters. Yet you have your panties in a twist over the execution of one self-proclaim murderer/terrorist. Do you actually KNOW the difference between enemy and criminal? I do not think my "panties are in a twist" as you so eloquently stated. I am not sorry to see OBL sleeping with the fishes, either. What I am saying is that killing an unarmed man when we could try him as a war criminal is what the conventions of war state is the correct action. Shooting unarmed soldiers is not smiled upon, you are supposed to take them prisoner. Assassinations are banned... it is what it is. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Geneva_Convention You ask if I know the difference between an enemy and a criminal, this question posed by you shows that you do not understand it yourself. The words define concepts that are not mutually exclusive, and supposedly under the international treaties we signed on to, war is only justified based on the criminal behavior of leaders. quote:
If you want to know OBL's side of the story there are several videos and tapes that were released from him. You might start with YouTube as they likely have them. I, on the other hand, am perfectly content with classing him as bat-shit fucking crazy. I think serial killers are batshit crazy, still if one killed a member of my family I think I may want details their evil fucking heart held. Perhaps you might too. As for the tapes holding the answers, hmmmmm, I did not want the narrative he sought to release. I would rather have his story challenged to get at deeper truths instead of propaganda. quote:
You class OBL as a serial killer? That is a bizarre way of looking at it. You are either choosing not to understand the analogy for your the sake of your argument, or you are not keeping up with the discussion. quote:
Check Ground Zero. The remains are there. Those that were not found, that is. Or they are in the air we are breathing now. Oh cute, again, either intentionally misunderstanding in a facetious way because you can't debate, or you can't keep up with the analogy. I need to waste my time spelling it out for you? Trials reveal facts that might not otherwise ever be known. This happens ALL OF THE FUCKING TIME. People talk to authorities and they give information. Can you imagine the information OBL would have on his terror networks, etc etc etc? Perhaps you can't conceive of that because sometimes killin' just feels good, and you would rather feel good than with the thought of destruction of life than get some productive intel... whatever floats your boat. quote:
Again, look up the difference between 'enemy' and 'criminal.' Again, read the Geneva Conventions, you do not understand how terms cannot be mutually exclusive quote:
Well, yes. Because he would be alive and in court. And he would be a rallying point for further attacks. And we all know how we should pussy out instead of doing the right thing, not only for our own sense of wanting truth, getting justice, but because we may have gleaned information that could have completely destroyed that organization....
_____________________________
Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt
|