willbeurdaddy
Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Marc2b I don't know much about Rand Paul, to me he is just another politician, and he may be exagerating a bit to get his point across but he is essentially correct. When you declare a product or service to be a right, you are essentially declaring that others MUST serve you. If I have a right to health care then other people MUST provide it. If I have a right to decent housing, then other people MUST provide it for me. That goes against the very idea of a free society. Now, before you bobble heads out there get your panties in a twist, this doesn't mean I think it is a bad idea for everyone to have access to health care (how we go about doing that is an argument I'll save for another day) but let's not be intellectually dishonest by calling it a right. If someone is providing you health care for free or even for less than cost, then it is a benefit. When you start labeling benefits as rights... well... witness the indignant, whiney, responses on this thread. Indignant, whiney citizens who believe that they are entitled to service provided by others does not make for a viable society. This. Rare agreement between us!
_____________________________
Hear the lark and harken to the barking of the dogfox, gone to ground.
|