quote:

ORIGINAL: Mezrem

That said I will stick to the points I had back then... neither Newt or Arnold should be trusted. It is not that either one of them fucked another.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Why does Sanity want his cock?

Because he won't come out of the closet.

Tom Cruise Won't Come Out of The Closet

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


"Faggot" jokes now children?

Grow up.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Why does Sanity want his cock?

Because he won't come out of the closet.

Tom Cruise Won't Come Out of The Closet

quote:

The thread is about leftists sniffing Conservative cock, mnot

quote:

ORIGINAL: ebonywarqueen

I can explain it to you. Lets say I start publicly derailing you as sick, perverted, immoral and evil incarnate because you are into BDSM. Then later you find out that the whole time I was publicly denouncing you, I was doing pretty much the exact same thing that I was demonizing you for? Would it not make me even worse? Its not so much his indiscretions that offend people, but in the words of Larry Flynt "Its the hypocrisy..." There is an ancient proverb that says "a hypocrite kicks with his hind legs and licks with his tongue" and if you are a Christian: Romans 2:1 says that people like this are inexcusable and verse 24 says they blaspheme the name of God.......And IF I really wanted to get critical with it; I could point out that Jesus said every sin is forgivable except blashpemy; but this particular thread is about politics and not religion, so I won't go there.

quote:

in the last decade, anyway. No surprise here: according to an NBC tally, the party of family values and general sanctimoniousness is pounding the Democrats in the sex-scandal Olympics. Of course, it's possible that Democrats are just better at getting away with this kind of thing. But it seems reasonable that making a big public show of outrage over other people's behavior could correlate with having some secret indiscretions of your own. After all, Newt Gingrich (one of the disgraced bunch on NBC's list) was notoriously cheating on his second wife even as he was loudly denouncing Bill Clinton for the Lewinsky affair. Conclusion: what a bunch of jackasses.
The Party of moral values strikes hard

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Werent all you leftists clamoring about how Clinton proved that a persons personal life didnt matter, even to the point of rape, way back in the 90s

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

The thread is about leftists sniffing Conservative cock, mnot

You tell me. You brought it up.

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


"Faggot" jokes now children?

Grow up.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Why does Sanity want his cock?

Because he won't come out of the closet.

Tom Cruise Won't Come Out of The Closet

Everyone knows that the above clip isn't making fun of fags, this one does
http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/254813/brub-brrub-brrrrub

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Werent all you leftists clamoring about how Clinton proved that a persons personal life didnt matter, even to the point of rape, way back in the 90s

Sanity, My prob is this. you were attacking Clinton over his fucking around. OK, that is cool

You also attacked people who said "But Bush and the Republicans did it first"

You have to take a side. Is it OK if YOUR side does it first and not when the other side does it?

Is it the other way around?

My main problem is if someone preached "Family Values" and they're fucking around they are a hypocrite and unfit to hold any public office.

I don't care what the letter after their name is......Practice what you preach.

quote:

Impeaching Clinton for sexual acts was wrong...impeaching him for lying to the American people, under oath, was very correct.
'hawk

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

Actually, that clip really doesn't make fun of gay people.... it makes fun of Tom Cruise... But I suppose you would have to be a South Park fan to understand that

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


No Hill, I wasnt attacking Clinton, what I wrote was that leftists were telling us in the 90s that someones personal life didnt matter, even to the point of rape

Yet now thats all leftists want to focus on, their political opponents personal lives

Referencing factiual history isnt an attack

And if you still havent heard of the rape and sexual assault charges that were the genesis of the Monicagate scandal you have to be willfully ignorant regarding the facts and the history of the case

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Werent all you leftists clamoring about how Clinton proved that a persons personal life didnt matter, even to the point of rape, way back in the 90s

Sanity, My prob is this. you were attacking Clinton over his fucking around. OK, that is cool

You also attacked people who said "But Bush and the Republicans did it first"

You have to take a side. Is it OK if YOUR side does it first and not when the other side does it?

Is it the other way around?

My main problem is if someone preached "Family Values" and they're fucking around they are a hypocrite and unfit to hold any public office.

I don't care what the letter after their name is......Practice what you preach.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
That was in reference to sexual scandal, and no mnot brought it up.

Youre the one who turned the thread into a gay-bashing fest mm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

The thread is about leftists sniffing Conservative cock, mnot

You tell me. You brought it up.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


No Hill, I wasnt attacking Clinton, what I wrote was that leftists were telling us in the 90s that someones personal life didnt matter, even to the point of rape

Yet now thats all leftists want to focus on, their political opponents personal lives

Referencing factiual history isnt an attack

And if you still havent heard of the rape and sexual assault charges that were the genesis of the Monicagate scandal you have to be willfully ignorant regarding the facts and the history of the case

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Werent all you leftists clamoring about how Clinton proved that a persons personal life didnt matter, even to the point of rape, way back in the 90s

Sanity, My prob is this. you were attacking Clinton over his fucking around. OK, that is cool

You also attacked people who said "But Bush and the Republicans did it first"

You have to take a side. Is it OK if YOUR side does it first and not when the other side does it?

Is it the other way around?

My main problem is if someone preached "Family Values" and they're fucking around they are a hypocrite and unfit to hold any public office.

I don't care what the letter after their name is......Practice what you preach.

I Have heard those charges and checked them out thoroughtly and based on snopes, they are utter partisan bullshit.

My prob is with people that preach "family values" while they are cheating.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

And so long as  neo-cons cease sniffing up our very asses and forcing their brand of morality on us, it remains so.

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

You know, it really irritates me when someone posts at the top of a reply instead of following the usual form of what we read . When it gets into multiple quotes it is uncomfortable to try to follow the flow of the conversation because one poster insists on posting on the top of the other person. I have tried to figure out why Sanity does this. I have my speculations as to why, but it gets rather tiring having to copy and paste replies to try to keep the logical progression of any interchange with him straight.

After reading the posts above, it just struck me how ridiculous it is to post this way.... and how it isn't very polite to the people who come here and read it.

And to the mods who hate it when we do not trim our posts, this time I left it untrimmed on purpose, to illustrate a point.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Werent all you leftists clamoring about how Clinton proved that a persons personal life didnt matter, even to the point of rape, way back in the 90s

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The thread is about leftists sniffing Conservative cock, mnot

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

And so long as  neo-cons cease sniffing up our very asses and forcing their brand of morality on us, it remains so.

Actually the thread is about 2 men who apparently represent the whole republican party. I find this very amusing. People have said that they would have been ok with the way Newt treated his wife, if he hadn't been picking on Clinton at the same time. Now I am not sure why it would be ok in either case, but I am conservative, so maybe a liberal can explain it to me.