hematitan
Posts: 49
Joined: 6/25/2010 Status: offline
|
This is something I'd like to like, because openness and acceptance regarding gender is something I'd love to see more of. But I don't think this is a necessary or particularly beneficial step in that direction. And while I don't want to jump to conclusions about the parents' intentions, the possibility that this is largely for attention or to make a point is definitely there, and kids shouldn't be used to make points. But the main issues I have: 1: The kid isn't even old enough to have developed a sense of gender at this point. It's easy enough to commit to raising the kid androgynously now -- in a couple years, if the parents intend to continue with it, it probably won't be so simple. 2: At this age, the kid is probably spending the majority of his or her time with family anway, and the parents and siblings already know the kid's sex. There's no guarantee that they won't subconsciously let that affect how they treat the child. So it's hardly a perfect "experiment." 3: Sex is not gender. These parents could commit to supporting the child's gender identity and expression without hiding the kid's sex. 4: Loving your children for who they are is wonderful. Being so "accepting" that you expect and want them to be noncomformist isn't. It's just another type of extreme. I wish more people were open to the fact that with a baby, there's no absolute guarantee of what the kid's gender will end up being, or what their personality and tastes will be like. There's not guarantee that a child born XX will identify as a girl, nor is there a guarantee that if she is a girl, she'll like certain things or act a certain way. But once a child starts developing a sense of self identity and develops tastes and style, it's important to respect that. That means supporting your kid if they're trans, and not freaking out if your son loves dolls, but it also means accepting that your XX chromosome baby might well end up being your daughter who loves dolls. Sometimes with parents like this, I get the sense that they're trying so hard to be progressive that they may actually be pushing androgyny and/or gender "non-comformance" on their kids rather than embracing who their kids really are.
|