tweakabelle
Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
|
Notewrothy too are Burchill's so-serious so-intellectual stated reasons for her position in her Guardian piece :
"I can't help noticing that, over the years, a disproportionate number of attractive, kind, clever people are drawn to Jews; those who express hostility to them, however, from Hitler to Hamza, are often as not repulsive freaks.
Think of famous anti-Zionist windbags - Redgrave, Highsmith, Galloway - and what dreary, dysfunctional, po-faced vanity confronts us. When we consider famous Jew-lovers, on the other hand - Marilyn, Ava, Liz, Felicity Kendal, me - what a sumptuous banquet of radiant humanity we look upon!"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2003/nov/29/weekend.julieburchill
Clearly her position is not the outcome of a formidable intellectual process or any analysis of pertinent data. It's just a good look (or so she tells us).
Even if, for the sake of discussion, we grant Willbur's claim that 'The Guardian' is "proven anti-Semitic", then that leaves another 3 sources which he claimed were the also "proven anti-Semitic sources", but for which no supporting evidence or proof has yet been advanced.
When asked for proof themedialine.org, was a "proven anti-Semitic source" Willbur responded: "medialine...dont know them, and the quote is no big deal.". One might reasonably ask if Willbur "doesn't know them", on what basis does he allege them to be a "proven anti-Semitic source"? This is BS of the first order.
That he was 100% wrong in describing 972 magazine as a "blog" (as if being a blog on its own makes it anti-Semitic!) can be confirmed by a quick visit to 972 magazine here. A single click reveals Willbur's tenuous relationship with truth (some would say non-existent relationship).
So Willbur has been making wild claims will no basis in fact again. I say again because regular posters here are very familiar with Willbur's penchant for making things up whenever it suits him. This is why his claims of bigotry can be dismissed derisively - Willbur has no credibility on this (or many other issues) at all.
I note that all of our resident voluble pro-Zionists - usually they can't be shut up - still remain unable or unwilling to address or even comment upon any of the reports in the OP. Do they seriously believe that the massive systematic abuses described in the OP are going to go away if they pretend they don't exist?
Ignoring the obvious, denying reality, and inventing spurious claims might be necessary to maintain faith in Zionist causes, but do they really believe that the rest of the world is join them, ostrich-like, and sticking its collective head in the sand too? Do they seriously believe that the world is going to look the other way and let them complete the theft of Occupied Palestine? And what does their attitude of blanket denial say about their cause?
< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 6/2/2011 4:11:40 PM >
_____________________________
|
RE: A day in the life ......... - 
Profile
.gif){kind=avatar}
You posted extracts from 18 articles. That doesn't invite analysis or discussion unlike one or two articles which is da norm for OPs. The huge amount of material makes most readers take it at face value so it looks like propaganda cause few have time to weigh da differing accounts of 18 contentious events
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread