RE: A day in the life ......... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/2/2011 6:56:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead
Burchill has spent most of her career as a columnist lying through her teeth and altering facts in hindsight to make herself look better. The column I've linked to is an obvious case of this, particularly as her complaints about liberal jewbashing appears to be more an excuse to have a go at Richard Ingrams than anything else.

Columnists http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columnist are also journalists. So you think it is an excuse to bash Ingrams? She has written bout this topic on a few occasions. You misled with a quote from her article to make her look anti-Semitic. You dislike her a lot which means you read anything she did negatively so your views may be taken with a pinch o' salt.




Termyn8or -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/2/2011 8:01:16 PM)

"You want any expression of support for Israel to literally "shut up". "

It is YOU who are in THIS thread. Why are you here ? You have planty of friends. Right ? You don't need us right ?

Get your big panties on and let's get real or take a walk.

T^T




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/2/2011 8:16:33 PM)

Right back at you Bubba, why are you here? [:D] What da fuck does "It is YOU who are in THIS thread" mean - we are all contibuting to this thread, PMSL. I'm talking bout her intolerance of opposing views, somethin' you probably share also.




Termyn8or -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/2/2011 9:04:15 PM)

Let the games go on then.

Your US-centric view doesn't work here BTW. There are people way too smart for you. They have real info, news and freedoms that are beyond your grasp. Go figure. Sheeple.

T^T




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/2/2011 9:13:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
Let the games go on then.

Your US-centric view doesn't work here BTW. There are people way too smart for you. They have real info, news and freedoms that are beyond your grasp. Go figure. Sheeple.

Its clear there's no point debatin' with you Bubba. All I'll say is that you're entitled to your view even if its just insult, speakin' of "freedoms" at least I respect your right to that. [8|]




Termyn8or -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/2/2011 10:11:51 PM)

You speak of insult as if you accomplished that by calling me Bubba. You didn't even come close, and at least half the members here will tell you that you have not the mentality to even begin to insult me, any more than a flea. And some of those are my adversaries here. Welcome to hell, snowball.

Fucking ask them.

The debate is fine, but YOU started the name calling and I am too good to finish it.

Deal with it, out here in the court of public opinion. And remember all your words are here for perpetuity, in case you didn't know. Now do you want to get rid of the Bubba shit and talk ? Or would you rather sink to the bottom and have this whole fucking thread pulled ?

Your call Professor.

T^T




tweakabelle -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/2/2011 10:25:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh


[

quote:


I note that all of our resident voluble pro-Zionists - usually they can't be shut up - still remain unable or unwilling to address or even comment upon any of the reports in the OP. Do they seriously believe that the massive systematic abuses described in the OP are going to go away if they pretend they don't exist?

You want any expression of support for Israel to literally "shut up". That is obvious throughout with your comments on "Zionists" which you make out to be liars.


Actually asking questions is one of inviting people to respond, not shut up. So you got that one completely back to front. I was inviting our resident Zionists to respond to the OP. Which, to date they have pointedly failed to do. A consistent record of failure that, I note, your post maintains. Why? Your excuse is:

quote:

I said it five times already but it looks like I'll have to say it again. [8|] You posted extracts from 18 articles. That doesn't invite analysis or discussion unlike one or two articles which is da norm for OPs. The huge amount of material makes most readers take it at face value so it looks like propaganda cause few have time to weigh da differing accounts of 18 contentious events


Several people have invited you several times to pick a single report then and comment on it. Which you are continuing to fail to do...... Why? If 18 reports are "too many" then surely a comment on just one report is not asking too much.

In post #37, there is a report detailing a few incidents of what could be seen as a systematic campaign of child abuse and intimidation by IDF thugs. The details of the report are shocking by anyone's standards. If something like that happened in your country or mine, there would justifiable public outrage. Heads would roll. Criminal charges would be laid against the perpetrators. Massive compensation payouts could be anticipated.

Does your silence indicate that you think it's OK for the IDF to behave in this manner? I can't believe that you approve of thugs terrorising children at gunpoint. Your silence suggests that it may be a possibility. I am inviting you specifically to comment on that report. It can't possibly be beyond your ability to comprehend and respond to single report. If you wish to make a positive contribution to the thread, (as you insist you do) here is your chance.







Termyn8or -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/3/2011 4:40:55 AM)

"Its clear there's no point debatin' with you Bubba."

You haven't the foggiest idea how to debate. You know what, if I were a pro-Zionist I would throw you the fuck out. I would consider you a liability.

T^T




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/3/2011 5:20:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
You speak of insult as if you accomplished that by calling me Bubba. You didn't even come close, and at least half the members here will tell you that you have not the mentality to even begin to insult me, any more than a flea. And some of those are my adversaries here. Welcome to hell, snowball.

Fucking ask them.

The debate is fine, but YOU started the name calling and I am too good to finish it.

Deal with it, out here in the court of public opinion. And remember all your words are here for perpetuity, in case you didn't know. Now do you want to get rid of the Bubba shit and talk ? Or would you rather sink to the bottom and have this whole fucking thread pulled ?

Your call Professor.

K so you are "Professor Bubba", does dat make you happier now? I'm not askin' anyone Bubba, you were da one to start the insults by attackin' me on page one of this thread, to which I responded with your new name "Bubba", Bubba. Funny also how you want me to stop calling you "Bubba" but still insult me personally. Ever heard of double standards?


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
"Its clear there's no point debatin' with you Bubba."

You haven't the foggiest idea how to debate. You know what, if I were a pro-Zionist I would throw you the fuck out. I would consider you a liability.

Thanks for dat Bubba. Guess da "pro-Zionists" will have to ban me! [8|] Anyone curious bout how brilliantly Bubba debates can have a little look-see near da end of page one.

Yours in ultimate respectin' for your Bubba professorship sir, Cletus Spungler. [:D]




Moonhead -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/3/2011 5:24:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead
Burchill has spent most of her career as a columnist lying through her teeth and altering facts in hindsight to make herself look better. The column I've linked to is an obvious case of this, particularly as her complaints about liberal jewbashing appears to be more an excuse to have a go at Richard Ingrams than anything else.

Columnists http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columnist are also journalists. So you think it is an excuse to bash Ingrams? She has written bout this topic on a few occasions. You misled with a quote from her article to make her look anti-Semitic. You dislike her a lot which means you read anything she did negatively so your views may be taken with a pinch o' salt.


Fine. If my opinion of Burchill's insincerity isn't adequete for you, perhaps you'll take wiki's word for it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: How la Burch left the Gaurdian over a pay squabble, joined the Times, was fired by the Times, and then rejoined the repulsively antisemtic Guardian...

For five years until 2003 Burchill wrote a weekly column in The Guardian. Appointed in 1998 by Orr, while editor of the Guardian Weekend supplement, Burchill's career was in trouble; she had been sacked by the revived Punch magazine. Burchill frequently thanks Orr for rescuing her. One of the pieces she wrote for The Guardian was in reaction to the murder of BBC TV presenter Jill Dando in 1999. She compared the shock of Dando's murder to finding a "tarantula in a punnet full of strawberries". In 2002 she narrowly escaped prosecution for incitement to racial hatred, "following a Guardian column where she described Ireland as being synonymous with child molestation, Nazi-sympathising, and the oppression of women."
Burchill left The Guardian acrimoniously, saying in an interview that they had offered her a sofa in lieu of a pay rise. She claims to have left the newspaper in protest at what she saw as its "vile anti-Semitism".
She moved to The Times, who were more willing to meet her demands, doubling her previous salary at the Guardian. Shortly after starting her weekly column, she referred to George Galloway, but appeared to confuse him with former MP Ron Brown, reporting the misdeeds of Brown as those of Galloway, "he incited Arabs to fight British troops in Iraq". Galloway threatened legal action which was averted when she apologised and The Times paid damages.
In 2006 The Times dropped her Saturday column, and arranged a more flexible arrangement with Burchill writing for the daily paper. Later it emerged during a Guardian interview, published on 4 August 2008, that eventually she "was given the jolly old heave ho" by The Times, and paid off for the last year of her three year contract, still receiving the £300,000 she would have earned if she had been obliged to provide copy. She later described her columns for her abbreviated Times contract, which ended abruptly in 2007, thus: "I was totally taking the piss. I didn't spend much time on them and they were such arrant crap."
In February 2006, she announced plans for a year's sabbatical from journalism, planning, among other things, to study theology. She had previously, in 1999, 'found God', and become a Lutheran. In June 2007, she announced that she would not be returning to journalism, but instead concentrate on writing books and TV scripts and finally undertake a theology degree, but she returned to writing for The Guardian newspaper.


(In the light of the Lutheran conversion, and the antisemitism thing, is it worth pointing out that she's been blathering about converting to Judaism for the last couple of years?)




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/3/2011 6:04:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh
quote:


I note that all of our resident voluble pro-Zionists - usually they can't be shut up - still remain unable or unwilling to address or even comment upon any of the reports in the OP. Do they seriously believe that the massive systematic abuses described in the OP are going to go away if they pretend they don't exist?

You want any expression of support for Israel to literally "shut up". That is obvious throughout with your comments on "Zionists" which you make out to be liars.

Actually asking questions is one of inviting people to respond, not shut up. So you got that one completely back to front. I was inviting our resident Zionists to respond to the OP. Which, to date they have pointedly failed to do. A consistent record of failure that, I note, your post maintains. Why? Your excuse is:

Wrong Tweak, you posed no questions what so ever. No one bothered cause you posted up 18 stories!!! Aside from da article copy 'n' paste job this is what The Tweak's OP said:

"Below are incidents from an ordinary day in the West bank of Occupied Palestine. Nothing exceptional, nothing out of the ordinary, fortunately no one was shot dead by the IDF - this is what happens there on a routine basis every day of the week every week of the year. This is the 43rd year of Israeli Occupation. Please decide for yourself how much of this legitimate self defence. (...) The above is a snapshot of everyday life in Occupied Palestine. It is far from a complete picture of life in Occupied Palestine but AFAIK it's not untypical either. If you think this is an unusal series of events or an unbalanced picture, please subscribe to either of the following sites for a couple of weeks. Then decide for yourself. These US sites provided the sources for the above information."

No questions/challenges, just recommendin' two of preferred pro-Pally sites yet again after tons of stories. Why does she keep recommendin dem sites so much? To propagandise?

quote:


quote:

I said it five times already but it looks like I'll have to say it again. [8|] You posted extracts from 18 articles. That doesn't invite analysis or discussion unlike one or two articles which is da norm for OPs. The huge amount of material makes most readers take it at face value so it looks like propaganda cause few have time to weigh da differing accounts of 18 contentious events

Several people have invited you several times to pick a single report then and comment on it. Which you are continuing to fail to do...... Why? If 18 reports are "too many" then surely a comment on just one report is not asking too much.

Tweak you come across as an arch propagandist. You post up 18 stories, some from highly partisan sites like WAFA, PLO news agency dat spread conspiracy for years! They spread stories dat Israel was using some sort of mutant super rats to force Pals out of Jerusalem http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/02/20/the-top-13-zionist-animal-conspiracy-theories/2/ a few years back! Da point is simple and I said it again an' again. [8|] You posted up far too many stories in da OP. Each story cannot be properly debated normally. Focusing on just one is pointless. It legitimises a thread where da OP was loaded against any meaningful discussion. If others disagree they can of course respond to da stories.




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/3/2011 6:48:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead
quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead
Burchill has spent most of her career as a columnist lying through her teeth and altering facts in hindsight to make herself look better. The column I've linked to is an obvious case of this, particularly as her complaints about liberal jewbashing appears to be more an excuse to have a go at Richard Ingrams than anything else.

Columnists http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columnist are also journalists. So you think it is an excuse to bash Ingrams? She has written bout this topic on a few occasions. You misled with a quote from her article to make her look anti-Semitic. You dislike her a lot which means you read anything she did negatively so your views may be taken with a pinch o' salt.

Fine. If my opinion of Burchill's insincerity isn't adequete for you, perhaps you'll take wiki's word for it.
(...)
(In the light of the Lutheran conversion, and the antisemitism thing, is it worth pointing out that she's been blathering about converting to Judaism for the last couple of years?)

Interesting quote but its a bit selective again Moony. You said on this thread dat her stance was just opportunistic and that in fact she is very anti-Semitic. Now you say she's considering conversion to Judaism! Maybe it was opportunistic for her to raise the issue when leaving or maybe she left for a number of reasons in part to do with anti-Semitism cause she has strongly supported Israel for a long time as da wiki page you quote says. Her objections bout da Granuaid could still easily be seen as sincere even if da motivations for leaving were mixed. Yeah a few years later she rejoined da Guardian for an occasional column but she's a jobbing journalist and it must've been quite a humiliating climedown!




Moonhead -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/3/2011 8:32:28 AM)

It was more that she'd been fired from the Times, than anything else.
Maybe it's just me, but you don't go back to working for a paper if you left it for ideological reasons rather than financial ones, particularly if you expect anybody to grant what you've been saying about them any credence.




tweakabelle -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/3/2011 6:33:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh

You post up 18 stories, some from highly partisan sites like WAFA, PLO news agency dat spread conspiracy for years! They spread stories dat Israel was using some sort of mutant super rats to force Pals out of Jerusalem http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/02/20/the-top-13-zionist-animal-conspiracy-theories/2/ a few years back! Da point is simple and I said it again an' again. [8|] You posted up far too many stories in da OP. Each story cannot be properly debated normally. Focusing on just one is pointless. It legitimises a thread where da OP was loaded against any meaningful discussion. If others disagree they can of course respond to da stories.


So if I start another thread with that single report you will respond to it? That would truly be "pointless" - we both know you will invent another flimsy excuse to weasel out of confronting the truth. Nonetheless, please prove me wrong - I'm happy to do it if you agree to respond to it.

Such a perverse world you must inhabit when the career path of an over paid self indulgent hack is prioritised and important allegations of systematic child abuse and intimidation at gunpoint by the IDF are ignored. But it's not about the hack at all is it? You couldn’t care less about Ms Burchill’s fate. It's about avoiding evading diverting deflecting hijacking - anything to avoid addressing the issue of IDF's systematic child abuse that has been put to you. You cannot even bring yourself to mention it, to acknowledge the possibility. Instead feeble excuse after feeble excuse is trotted out in a pathetic effort to put a veneer of respectability on your so-eloquent silence.

One wonders what kind of fascism runs through the Zionist camp to the extent that Zionists prefer silence and the possibility of being identified as a supporter of child abuse than accept that their side might be wrong in this instance. Even our Israeli poster, ProminentTOOL freely admitted there have been cases of unjustifiable killings by the IDF. Israeli soldiers have been convicted by Israeli courts of war crimes. These things happen. They are real. Retreating into blanket denial about them brings up uncomfortable questions about your real motives and your relationship with reality.

So, why silence? Your point blank refusal to address the allegation speaks volumes. Any open-minded reader will be thinking: 'Is it guilt, hypocrisy, racism/double standards, moral cowardice, neurosis, fanaticism ...or all of the above? Isn’t silence a tacit admission the IDF is guilty as charged? No innocent party would ever let such a monstrous allegation stand unchallenged.”

Many will be wondering about the fascism of a cause that demands such blind unquestioning loyalty, which insists its followers turn a blind eye to the truth. Especially as it concerns systematic institutionalised child abuse and intimidation, which is about as despicable as it gets. What just cause needs such wilful self-delusion? What just cause could possibly need such moral compromise?

And on a far more pragmatic level, even pro-Israelis will be wondering (with very good reason): "Is this how some suicide bombers of the future are created?"




Termyn8or -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/3/2011 8:24:41 PM)

FR

While I usually don't like to kill threads based on a whiney ass . and a bunch of people with brains, it is time.

And Fleshy, that's what you are. I can tell Mom to go fuck herself, I can tell my boss to go fuck himself. In fact I have walked in there at almost closing time, telling him I did coke and that's why I wasn't there, and he fronted me. This is the closest to the "American Dream" gets. It is ending but I do have a contingency pla of course.

Pay your taxes and suppotrt the wars your people want. I don't. I took care of my business and someday you might know my name. From Fox news.

T^Twister !^

T^T




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/3/2011 8:40:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
FR

While I usually don't like to kill threads based on a whiney ass . and a bunch of people with brains, it is time.

And Fleshy, that's what you are. I can tell Mom to go fuck herself, I can tell my boss to go fuck himself. In fact I have walked in there at almost closing time, telling him I did coke and that's why I wasn't there, and he fronted me. This is the closest to the "American Dream" gets. It is ending but I do have a contingency pla of course.

Pay your taxes and suppotrt the wars your people want. I don't. I took care of my business and someday you might know my name. From Fox news.

T^Twister !^

K Professor Bubba, tell your lucky Mom an' boss to go fuck themselves, an' keep on keepin' on with your senseless bullshit.




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/3/2011 8:51:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh
You post up 18 stories, some from highly partisan sites like WAFA, PLO news agency dat spread conspiracy for years! They spread stories dat Israel was using some sort of mutant super rats to force Pals out of Jerusalem http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/02/20/the-top-13-zionist-animal-conspiracy-theories/2/ a few years back! Da point is simple and I said it again an' again. [8|] You posted up far too many stories in da OP. Each story cannot be properly debated normally. Focusing on just one is pointless. It legitimises a thread where da OP was loaded against any meaningful discussion. If others disagree they can of course respond to da stories.

So if I start another thread with that single report you will respond to it? That would truly be "pointless" - we both know you will invent another flimsy excuse to weasel out of confronting the truth. Nonetheless, please prove me wrong - I'm happy to do it if you agree to respond to it.

Feel free to start any thread you wish but I probably won't respond. Why? You'll pretend its what you have been sayin' all along but I won't make any promises cause rather than discuss you post pompous essays, and treat anyone with extreme contempt anyone that holds a opposing opinions. Why would I or anyone else bother talking to someone like that?

YOU talk bout confronting da truth! DomKen, Prominenttool, myself and others made fair points but you ignored dem or counter-attacked. PT said he waz ex-IDF and you started throwing hysterical accusations bout him being a brut to Palestinians. If I felt you had any capacity to be sincere I would discuss these issues with you but my dear you are only a propagandist seeking to convert. I talk to people who are open to ideas as I try to be open to theirs. You have contempt for truth not in your favor. You throw accusations of racism while whining when anyone returns da favour! You rant an' rage on ad nauseum. Israel is ebel ebel ebel and dats it! The hatred that people like you display is disturbing.

quote:


Such a perverse world you must inhabit when the career path of an over paid self indulgent hack is prioritised and important allegations of systematic child abuse and intimidation at gunpoint by the IDF are ignored. But it's not about the hack at all is it? You couldn’t care less about Ms Burchill’s fate. It's about avoiding evading diverting deflecting hijacking - anything to avoid addressing the issue of IDF's systematic child abuse that has been put to you. You cannot even bring yourself to mention it, to acknowledge the possibility. Instead feeble excuse after feeble excuse is trotted out in a pathetic effort to put a veneer of respectability on your so-eloquent silence.

Why would I be concerned bout Burchill's fate? She's doing OK! I just made a point that she was the one that left da Guardian. You keep ranting bout child abuse. You said before you want objective sources to verify facts. Well so much fabrication has been pushed by da pro-Pal camp (like Zionist engineered super rats to prey on poor Palests) and so many other stories (sometimes completely invented) that few pro-Pal sources can be taken seriously. Every story must be weighed from different perspectives for some sense of truth.

You talk bout hijacking lol. Thank dog for hijacks cause hardly anyone bothered with da thread. It would've died days ago if you didn't keep arguing over a simple point dat I made.

quote:


One wonders what kind of fascism runs through the Zionist camp to the extent that Zionists prefer silence and the possibility of being identified as a supporter of child abuse than accept that their side might be wrong in this instance. Even our Israeli poster, ProminentTOOL freely admitted there have been cases of unjustifiable killings by the IDF. Israeli soldiers have been convicted by Israeli courts of war crimes. These things happen. They are real. Retreating into blanket denial about them brings up uncomfortable questions about your real motives and your relationship with reality.

Here you throw da accusation dat anyone who speaks up for Israel is a supporter of child abuse. This is another cheap disgusting tactic of yours. You must have no shame.

I kept sayin' Israel were not saints yet you won't stop making out I think they are perfect. The fact that PT told da truth speaks volumes bout his honesty. You possess no such gift.

quote:


So, why silence? Your point blank refusal to address the allegation speaks volumes. Any open-minded reader will be thinking: 'Is it guilt, hypocrisy, racism/double standards, moral cowardice, neurosis, fanaticism ...or all of the above? Isn’t silence a tacit admission the IDF is guilty as charged? No innocent party would ever let such a monstrous allegation stand unchallenged.”

Many will be wondering about the fascism of a cause that demands such blind unquestioning loyalty, which insists its followers turn a blind eye to the truth. Especially as it concerns systematic institutionalised child abuse and intimidation, which is about as despicable as it gets. What just cause needs such wilful self-delusion? What just cause could possibly need such moral compromise?

Here you throw more mud, throwing accusations of guilt (WTF?), racism, moral cowardice, neurosis, fanaticism an' fascism. Is it any wonder few on CM debate wit you on this topic?

Darlin' you need a reality check. I am not another Mark Regev. No one is obliged to play your stupid games. I made one point on this thread dat you have kept misrepresenting. You posted a propagandistic OP of a ridiculous number of contentious stories (18 articles) that didn't in an way invite debate and would be impossible to discuss fully.




Termyn8or -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/4/2011 5:30:30 AM)

"But I will admit, at least you're not such a pussy that you pulled the race card ..........."

I hereby recant that statement.

T^T




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/4/2011 7:33:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
"But I will admit, at least you're not such a pussy that you pulled the race card ..........."

I hereby recant that statement.

T^T

lol there are many more statements you should recant but I never said La Tweak was racist, said she throws da accusation at others but keeps on complainin' when laid at her door

~FR~ I must say sorry for the length of da last post. I hate fucking essays but got angry after she started saying we could be supporters of child abuse on top of everything else!!




Termyn8or -> RE: A day in the life ......... (6/4/2011 9:05:38 AM)

I hate to go offf topic, but I'm getting the impression that you live in some kind of rosy world. So rosy in fact the shorter wavelengths of light never reach you. You beloved Israel has the only government on this planet that can hold a candle to the nastiness of our own. We just do more because we're bigger.

Israeli law is steeped in the racism you supposedly abhor. Between them and the Palestinians makes the old south in this country look like making them eat a chuck steak instead of a porterhouse. It's available all over the place, read it. Know just what a Kibbutz is. Read their laws on slavery.

If it was any other country, this shit would be called ethnic cleansing, well except for China because quite frankly they own us damnear. China's another one that seems to be able to do whatever the fuck they want. Why ? If you don't know it, we are bullies. Israel has huge economic power and influence in many parts of the world, including here. Ever hear of AIPAC ? That's another reason why. China also doesn't incur our wrath because bullies don't pick on those their own size or bigger.

Now all the sudden everybody cares about Qaddafi, got any idea why ? Because whatever else is going on requires a distraction. I've seen the rose colored cloud from both sides now. Preach law and order all you want, but even in the USA you can still buy a human being. You can buy almost anything. Justice is not served in the "civilised" world, it all operates on money. That's what one of my best ever lawyers said, and he was right.

Now take what really goes on and suppose. Suppose every Palestinian around there converted to Judaism and got circumsized. Read the Torah and went to the synagogue, tithed and everything. They would still be treated like Blacks in the old south. That's racism, and in Israel it is institutionalized. Just like it was here. Only difference is we didn't build a wall. We just put up signs that said "Whites only".

Not that we are any tower of virtue mind you. I've been to places in this country where there are no Blacks. Why ? Because they would be stupid to go there. A couple of communities right here in Ohio, fucking triple A really should give different triptiks based on race. I am not kidding. Black - automatic stop. And tinted windows are illegal (beyond a certain limit) which enables profiling. Is that the intent or a side effect ? You can claim to know, but you don't. 

The whole fucking mess is caused by people putting on smiling faces. Want to take over a country ? Kill everyone there. Nobody is going to like being displaced. This protracted war shit is for the birds, no wait, birds aren't stupid enough to leave their emenies alive.

The way I see it is just have your war and the winner give us a call. And while you're at it use your own fucking money. That applies everwhere. Consider it euthenasia for the weak. Yes I am that fucking hard, but it's less cruel. Suffering a race to slow torture is much worse than just killing them with one quick blow.

Probably ¾ of the people on this planet disagree with me, but that doesn't make them right.

T^T




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875