Whiplashsmile4
Posts: 2305
Joined: 12/2/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: juliaoceania So, you think that a dominant that needs to exercise their control, micromanage a submissive, is a "whole human being"? You are not addressing the question I asked? Where are you pulling micromanage out from here? quote:
I suppose my exception to this, and I posted this earlier but you ignored it, is that you leveled this at people who were "submissive". You said (paraphrasing here) that people who were not "serving" but label themselves as "submissive" were not entirely whole human beings.... Please look at my last question, and consider the limited orientation labels available to use on this site. quote:
Now, from my perspective, PEOPLE who live entirely for themselves (not just submissive people), consider no one else, and use others for their satisfaction are not whole human beings. I would say, on average, I have read FAR more "dominant" profiles that fit this criteria than on the other side of the kneel. These profiles repel me. If someone does not see service as something that they give to others, well they have no place in my life. You are Dead on the money, In my opinion. quote:
I suppose it is that you have blinders on that on this thread (not every thread, just in this case) you tend to make it sound like it is ALL ABOUT YOU. Now I know from other things you write that this is not how you view your relationships, but if you look at what you have written on this thread, it sure the hell sounds that way. Now think about that... if I did not know you at all, and I just read this thread, I would think that you were all about you. Would that be fair? That is what you are doing to other people when you read that they have XYZ fetish, and you ASSUME that is all there is to them in their lives. Profiles are very incomplete, and they never represent but a two dimensional view of the entire person. Thank you for expressing what you just did. Profiles are a mere tip of the water to what somebody is about. However, if they make it clear that their fetish means more to them than a previous relationship, and this is why their last ended. (Clearly a Red Flag about how wrapped up in their fetish is?). For example, let's say. I wrote something on my profile. Like My EX WIFE hated the thoughts I tried to turn here into a Milk Cow, that's why I left her ass and I'm not here on CM looking for a REAL cow. What does this tell you about the character of the other person? At least in a Profile Summary? quote:
I can see how someone who had a fetish that they enjoyed being locked up for a couple of days at a time, would then get out of the cage, put on their work clothes and go out and try to find a cure for cancer 5 days a week. You are reducing people down to a fetish they have, and that, my friend, is wrong. There are people that have the occasional fetish, there are those that are driven to the point that it's an Addition. To the point it screws up relationships, to the point they retreat from the world and only care about having their Fetish feed. Hence where it's all about it 24/7 or it takes up most of their time outside of work. Read up on the criteria for additions and how much control an addition has in somebody's life. Think of people which fetish additions. Not occasional indulgence in a fetish. When a fetish or addition has control of somebody... that's what's controlling their ass. Kind of problematic in any relationship let alone a D/s one!
_____________________________
Жизнь ума ебет. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUzJI4Palq0
|