RE: The Palin Emails

RE: The Palin Emails (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Sanity -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 7:25:47 AM)
Yet another ad hominum Who is ron And I support my assertions well enough Fun fact is that for the most part, the only assertions that leftists have to support are these constant ad hominums Because they have no real on topic arguments quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania Stop while you are ahead, because Ron posted a few threads in which you could not support your assertions, I am sure there are many many many more such posts... In fact many times when you bash people for being leftists it it because you have no evidence of what you say.

Sanity -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 7:27:26 AM)
I admit that youre derailing right now... [;)] quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl So you admit to deliberately derailing threads?

mnottertail -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 7:30:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Yet another ad hominum Who is ron And I support my assertions well enough Fun fact is that for the most part, the only assertions that leftists have to support are these constant ad hominums Because they have no real on topic arguments quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania Stop while you are ahead, because Ron posted a few threads in which you could not support your assertions, I am sure there are many many many more such posts... In fact many times when you bash people for being leftists it it because you have no evidence of what you say. Jules posted no ad hominem here. You don't even know what an ad hominem is apparently.

thompsonx -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 7:42:48 AM)
quote: The silver lining may be that they end up turning away most common decent people with their indefensibly intolerant and hateful behavior... This and your self description as a rightwing asshole have been your two most genuine post about yourself.

Sanity -> RE: Palin Derangement Syndrome thread #25,377 (6/13/2011 8:22:32 AM)
Sure, thats it, theres a conspiracy afoot - they didnt really release all the emails The ones between Sarah Palin and Satan were obviously withheld... [:D] quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl The minute I heard they were white washed, I knew nothing would be found. No surprise here.

Kirata -> RE: Palin Derangement Syndrome thread #25,377 (6/13/2011 8:26:26 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity The ones between Sarah Palin and Satan were obviously withheld... [:D] That wasn't Satan, that was me... I was just, yanno, having a little fun with her. K.

juliaoceania -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 8:30:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Yet another ad hominum Who is ron And I support my assertions well enough Fun fact is that for the most part, the only assertions that leftists have to support are these constant ad hominums Because they have no real on topic arguments quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania Stop while you are ahead, because Ron posted a few threads in which you could not support your assertions, I am sure there are many many many more such posts... In fact many times when you bash people for being leftists it it because you have no evidence of what you say. Jules posted no ad hominem here. You don't even know what an ad hominem is apparently. quote: Jules posted no ad hominem here. You don't even know what an ad hominem is apparently. Ad hominem From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia quote: An ad hominem (Latin: "to the man"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to link the truth of a claim to a negative characteristic or belief of the person advocating it.[1] Kinda like when Sanity attacks all leftists for being illogical or emotional without any substantiation quote: The ad hominem is normally described as a logical fallacy,[2] but it is not always fallacious; in some instances, questions of personal conduct, character, motives, etc., are legitimate and relevant to the issue.[3] The philosopher Charles Taylor has argued that ad hominem reasoning is essential to understanding certain moral issues, and contrasts this sort of reasoning with the apodictic reasoning of philosophical naturalism.[4] Now above he thinks that questioning his personal conduct is an ad hominem, when his motivations are all important to why he posts the way he does, and as hatefully as he does

Lucylastic -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 8:33:37 AM)
I thought ad hominem meant truth /sarcasm off

juliaoceania -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 8:37:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I thought ad hominem meant truth /sarcasm off Well, it would be easy to assume that the way certain posters used this term, wouldn't it?

Lucylastic -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 8:41:03 AM)
well given the clusterfuck of what words actually mean compared to their dictionary definitions, yeah, totally Studying a dictionary and tempered with reasonability would help But Im guessing it will NOT happen

tazzygirl -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 9:01:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity I admit that youre derailing right now... [;)] quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl So you admit to deliberately derailing threads? The difference being, Sanity, I admit when Im doing it.

Moonhead -> RE: Palin Derangement Syndrome thread #25,377 (6/13/2011 9:03:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity The ones between Sarah Palin and Satan were obviously withheld... [:D] That wasn't Satan, that was me... I was just, yanno, having a little fun with her. K. Careful, you'll set of DYB again...

tazzygirl -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 9:03:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I thought ad hominem meant truth /sarcasm off Its like when I posted the picture of Bush kissing the Saudi King. Its truth, black and white. And Sanity accused me of being a gay basher. Thats an ad hominem.

Moonhead -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 9:04:58 AM)
The chimp is gay? Why weren't there any news reports about this while he was running the country?

willbeurdaddy -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 9:06:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I thought ad hominem meant truth /sarcasm off Its like when I posted the picture of Bush kissing the Saudi King. Its truth, black and white. And Sanity accused me of being a gay basher. Thats an ad hominem. It is?

mnottertail -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 9:07:30 AM)
You think he actually choked on a PRETZEL? You English Conservatives are an even more gullible lot than our conservatives.

Lucylastic -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 9:09:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I thought ad hominem meant truth /sarcasm off Its like when I posted the picture of Bush kissing the Saudi King. Its truth, black and white. And Sanity accused me of being a gay basher. Thats an ad hominem. I noticed around that time , he suggested obama was kissing Rev Wright So he was doing what? Hypocrisy and not knowing what an ad hominem means is just funny:) I know others use it properly, left right and middle but a couple have trouble.

Moonhead -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 9:13:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail You think he actually choked on a PRETZEL? You English Conservatives are an even more gullible lot than our conservatives. [sm=rofl.gif]

mnottertail -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 9:14:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I thought ad hominem meant truth /sarcasm off Its like when I posted the picture of Bush kissing the Saudi King. Its truth, black and white. And Sanity accused me of being a gay basher. Thats an ad hominem. It is? And now we are getting somewhere, he now knows it is an ad hominem and not an ad hominen, and now he is learning what it actually is.

Moonhead -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 9:16:14 AM)
[sm=jaw.gif] He'll be learning what a socialist is next...

Page: << < prev 13 14 [15] 16 17 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875