RE: The Palin Emails (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


slvemike4u -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 10:38:01 AM)

No wonder you never answer any of my letters.




mnottertail -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 10:38:51 AM)

The 20K emails are about your ass.  Don't be a hysterical cunt.

(written about 1980)

LOL.

Ron




Lucylastic -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 10:47:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

The 20K emails are about your ass. 

(written about 1980)

LOL.

Ron



Don't be a hysterical cunt.( SNORTSSSSSSSSSSSSS)
LMAO Ron, now thats just not true.... ok maybe some are about my love of arses and making the sore and hot and purple etc etc.
Ive redatcted all the boring ones and just talkied about sadistic pleasures, n masochistic pleasures:)
honest guv!!!!

Mike I don believe I have ever hid you or ignored your emails,..im looking now!!!!!!




juliaoceania -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 10:51:59 AM)

quote:

Again, if you need to reach back to an eighteen hundreds definition of a word in order to achieve a derail... to make an ad hominem attack... you would look a lot smarter if you just argued on topic.


All I can say is that if you knew where the word originated from, perhaps you would understand why it comes off as misogynistic to use it against women...

But alas, your refusal to understand the English language lets you off the hook on the misogyny charge...




juliaoceania -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 10:53:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

The 20K emails are about your ass.  Don't be a hysterical cunt.

(written about 1980)

LOL.

Ron



fucking hysterical[:D]




Sanity -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:00:43 AM)


Werent you just crying your eyes out over an alleged derail, julia?

Just a couple of hours ago?

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

Again, if you need to reach back to an eighteen hundreds definition of a word in order to achieve a derail... to make an ad hominem attack... you would look a lot smarter if you just argued on topic.


All I can say is that if you knew where the word originated from, perhaps you would understand why it comes off as misogynistic to use it against women...

But alas, your refusal to understand the English language lets you off the hook on the misogyny charge...




slvemike4u -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:04:19 AM)

Lol....don't bother sweetie....you answer each and every last one of my missives.....and I love you for it....lol.




Sanity -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:10:24 AM)


Since no one else is posting anything on topic...


From Newsbusters:

quote:


NBC Most Excited by Palin’s E-Mail, Yet Fails to Dig Up Any ‘Bombshells’


Much of the media made fools of themselves with their excited obsession over the release of Sarah Palin’s gubernatorial e-mails, but NBC News went the furthest, sending, as did CNN, reporters to Juneau as the network uniquely led its Friday night newscast by hyping the non-news as a major event. “On the broadcast tonight,” anchor Lester Holt heralded, “mail call. Thousands of pages of e-mail from Sarah Palin's time as Governor. What we're learning about her tonight.”


Following a story from “national investigative correspondent” Michael Isikoff in which “MSNBC.com investigative reporter” Bill Dedman had the gall to complain “we waited longer for these records than Sarah Palin was Governor, almost a thousand days,” NBC’s David Gregory recognized, in an understatement: “As Mike and his team are finding, not a lot of bombshells here.”

ABC also got into the act, but didn’t send any on-air personnel to Juneau. On Saturday’s World News, however, John Berman trumpeted his big discovery proving Palin’s hypocrisy: “While these days Palin is criticizing parts of Michelle Obama’s national battle against obesity...she once e-mailed an aide asking for ‘low carb foods...just don’t want the kids to have too much sugar/white carb stuff.’” That should pretty much discredit her.


[image]http://www.newsbusters.org/sites/default/files/NBCNN-Isikoff-2011-06-10-240.jpg[/image]

CBS showed the best news judgment, not mentioning the Palin e-mails on Friday or Saturday’s CBS Evening News.


Isikoff’s find – Palin once praised something candidate Barack Obama said: “Among the e-mails, this exchange from Palin to an aide written a few weeks before she was picked by McCain, praising then-candidate Obama’s energy policy speech. ‘He gave a great speech this morning in Michigan – mentioned Alaska,’ adding, ‘we need to take advantage of this and write a statement saying he's right on.’ Then in a later e-mail telling an aide, ‘he did say ‘yay’ to our gas line. Pretty cool. Wrong candidate.’ Palin later became one of Obama's fiercest critics on energy policy.”


Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2011/06/13/nbc-most-excited-palin-s-e-mail-yet-fails-dig-any-bombshells#ixzz1PBGtIQTZ







mnottertail -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:13:02 AM)

Again, there will be no bombshells---- they are redacted.  You know, like the Nixon 20 minute gap.

Anyway, we know that she is not as religious as she makes out to be, sorta got a potty mouth, (one of the reasons given for redaction). 




Lucylastic -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:13:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Lol....don't bother sweetie....you answer each and every last one of my missives.....and I love you for it....lol.

big ol smewch you havent written for a while!!!!!




juliaoceania -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:14:01 AM)

quote:

Werent you just crying your eyes out over an alleged derail, julia?

Just a couple of hours ago?


Clue, we have discussed this topic to its logical conclusion

1. The palin mails are online
2. no one here wants to read them
3. they are heavily redacted and boring
4. the news outlets that suffered through reading them say nothing is in them that is not already known (we all knew she was a petty gossipy vindictive wench

Now, if you feel you have something more to add to the topic, other than whining about the number of Palin threads, and bemoaning how the "leftists" are so mean to her because I started a thread about a news topic with no editorializing, go right the fuck ahead. You were the one that hijacked the thread to begin with, so it only makes sense that when it got too hot, you'd whine about it and wanna get back on topic.




juliaoceania -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:15:13 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Since no one else is posting anything on topic...


From Newsbusters:

quote:


NBC Most Excited by Palin’s E-Mail, Yet Fails to Dig Up Any ‘Bombshells’


Much of the media made fools of themselves with their excited obsession over the release of Sarah Palin’s gubernatorial e-mails, but NBC News went the furthest, sending, as did CNN, reporters to Juneau as the network uniquely led its Friday night newscast by hyping the non-news as a major event. “On the broadcast tonight,” anchor Lester Holt heralded, “mail call. Thousands of pages of e-mail from Sarah Palin's time as Governor. What we're learning about her tonight.”


Following a story from “national investigative correspondent” Michael Isikoff in which “MSNBC.com investigative reporter” Bill Dedman had the gall to complain “we waited longer for these records than Sarah Palin was Governor, almost a thousand days,” NBC’s David Gregory recognized, in an understatement: “As Mike and his team are finding, not a lot of bombshells here.”

ABC also got into the act, but didn’t send any on-air personnel to Juneau. On Saturday’s World News, however, John Berman trumpeted his big discovery proving Palin’s hypocrisy: “While these days Palin is criticizing parts of Michelle Obama’s national battle against obesity...she once e-mailed an aide asking for ‘low carb foods...just don’t want the kids to have too much sugar/white carb stuff.’” That should pretty much discredit her.


[image]http://www.newsbusters.org/sites/default/files/NBCNN-Isikoff-2011-06-10-240.jpg[/image]

CBS showed the best news judgment, not mentioning the Palin e-mails on Friday or Saturday’s CBS Evening News.


Isikoff’s find – Palin once praised something candidate Barack Obama said: “Among the e-mails, this exchange from Palin to an aide written a few weeks before she was picked by McCain, praising then-candidate Obama’s energy policy speech. ‘He gave a great speech this morning in Michigan – mentioned Alaska,’ adding, ‘we need to take advantage of this and write a statement saying he's right on.’ Then in a later e-mail telling an aide, ‘he did say ‘yay’ to our gas line. Pretty cool. Wrong candidate.’ Palin later became one of Obama's fiercest critics on energy policy.”


Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2011/06/13/nbc-most-excited-palin-s-e-mail-yet-fails-dig-any-bombshells#ixzz1PBGtIQTZ







This point was made by me on page three[8|]




Lucylastic -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:22:22 AM)

Is there anyone here has said they have or will read them?, flagellating a dead equine or what??
I think that particular horse has been named and put to bed more than once

[image]http://www.lucylasticslair.com/teehee.jpg[/image]




CruelNUnsual -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:26:27 AM)

What bullshit in this thread. Every idiot leftie here was drooling in anticipation of something to nail her with. DK must be so disappointed there isnt a fucking thing to take her down on with on "troopergate".




juliaoceania -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:33:29 AM)

quote:

. Every idiot leftie here was drooling in anticipation of something to nail her with.


Note to you:

She has already been taken down, half term governor, cancelled reality show, and last book was an epic failure. The republican party is running screaming from her like she might be contagious in her losing ways, kinda like they ran from GW




juliaoceania -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:34:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Is there anyone here has said they have or will read them?, flagellating a dead equine or what??
I think that particular horse has been named and put to bed more than once

[image]http://www.lucylasticslair.com/teehee.jpg[/image]



That graph would be even more funny if it had ad hominem spelled "ad hominen"




mnottertail -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:36:46 AM)

chances of a darling of the right being thrown under the bus when they are found to be a liability?

100%

TA DUNK!!!




Lucylastic -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:40:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CruelNUnsual

What bullshit in this thread. Every idiot leftie here was drooling in anticipation of something to nail her with. DK must be so disappointed there isnt a fucking thing to take her down on with on "troopergate".


LMAO I dont even think DK has posted to this clusterfuck

SOCK PUPPET ALERT< LMAOOOOOOOOO I knew one was gonna turn up
where has ANYONE here in this thread " drooled" over anticipation of the emails, dont be a liar
Put up or shut up,




Lucylastic -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:43:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Is there anyone here has said they have or will read them?, flagellating a dead equine or what??
I think that particular horse has been named and put to bed more than once

[image]http://www.lucylasticslair.com/teehee.jpg[/image]



That graph would be even more funny if it had ad hominem spelled "ad hominen"


you have a point, but then they would have dismissed it as being spelt wrong.:)




juliaoceania -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:45:16 AM)

quote:

you have a point, but then they would have dismissed it as being spelt wrong.:)


The "they" you are referring to already dismissed it...




Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875