RE: The Palin Emails (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

Sanity -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 4:35:47 PM)


I didnt write that every post I make includes such a link, julia... you are being ridiculous

farglebargle cant scientifically prove everything he posts

This isnt a forum where people are expected to scientifically prove everything they post. Its mostly opinion and if you want to resort to those actual weak rhetorical tricks (that anyone with intelligence laaughs at) (and that you accuse me of) go for it

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

Not in any of the quotes I pulled from you when you were attacking with NO evidence whatsoever... I refer you to farglebargle's quotes on this thread



Kirata -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 4:39:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania
quote:

Why do you assume that only women get hysterical...

Do you even know where the word comes from?

This is gonna be good.

K.



Lucylastic -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 4:43:06 PM)

I didnt post anywhere in that post that only get women get hysterical did I??? read my post again very slowly, sound out the words if you have any trouble, remember your punctuation too
oh and btw
Prove that Im sexist[:'(]
edited to fix a typo and apologise to Kirata, this obviously wasnt directed at you



tazzygirl -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 4:45:23 PM)

quote:

Just another baseless smear

EXAMPLE

Any regular here knows that hardly anyone posts more links and article quotes to hard news from as many widely varied sources as I

Thus, you only further make my point for me julia

So I thank you for your help


Ahem.



farglebargle -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 4:46:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

I didnt write that every post I make includes such a link, julia... you are being ridiculous

farglebargle cant scientifically prove everything he posts

This isnt a forum where people are expected to scientifically prove everything they post. Its mostly opinion and if you want to resort to those actual weak rhetorical tricks (that anyone with intelligence laaughs at) (and that you accuse me of) go for it



You made a claim about a lack of logic and rationality, and when that claim's rationality was logically challenged, you ran away from the rational, logical debate which you were making false claims about.

You're the guy who introduced the requirement for a strictly scientific approach, since what other process is more rational or more logical that the scientific method of hypothesis/data/theory?

And it's not so much requiring you to prove it scientifically, as I called bullshit, you folded faster than supergirl at the laundromat.

But hey, you had your chance to support your disproven claims. You chose not to. End of story.





Sanity -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 4:51:44 PM)


Leftists are proving my point in practically every post they make farg, no one needs anythng beyond that in a forum such as this.

From thread title to the last post in a thread its one ad hominem after another from the left... day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year.

Conservatives arent perfect, thats not what I am claiming. The point is thats all leftists ever post practically, ad hominem attacks.







tazzygirl -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 4:53:40 PM)

Define... ad hominem.... for me, Sanity. Your own definition, if you please.



farglebargle -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 4:54:26 PM)

Again, YOU HAD A CHANCE to make your case with that hypothesis. You chose not to.

By choosing not to, you failed to support your claim.

End of discussion. Please stop shitting on the thread further.



Sanity -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 4:58:51 PM)


I wrote hardly anyone, taz... [;)]

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Just another baseless smear

EXAMPLE

Any regular here knows that hardly anyone posts more links and article quotes to hard news from as many widely varied sources as I

Thus, you only further make my point for me julia

So I thank you for your help


Ahem.



Sanity -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 5:01:03 PM)


Its not a hypothesis, its an observation... [:D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Again, YOU HAD A CHANCE to make your case with that hypothesis. You chose not to.

By choosing not to, you failed to support your claim.

End of discussion. Please stop shitting on the thread further.



Politesub53 -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 5:03:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Conservatives arent perfect, thats not what I am claiming. The point is thats all leftists ever post practically, ad hominem attacks.




This fake indignation is laughable. Your long history of name calling and attacks on others isnt forgotten by many of us on here. I have noted how your latest method is aimed at attacking leftists, rather than individuals, a ploy to keep you beneath the mods radar no doubt. Lucky and Willbur do the same.

People in glass houses and all that.




farglebargle -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 5:07:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Its not a hypothesis, its an observation... [:D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Again, YOU HAD A CHANCE to make your case with that hypothesis. You chose not to.

By choosing not to, you failed to support your claim.

End of discussion. Please stop shitting on the thread further.



An observation would be "XYZ said on 12:34 of 5/6/11 '.......'"

Your stated hypothesis is: "for the most part leftists cannot argue logically".

You failed to provide ANY objective data supporting your hypothesis, and it has been held to be disproven.

Now you're just demonstrating your ignorance of the scientific method.

Please stop shitting on the thread further.



Kirata -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 5:22:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

what other process is more rational or more logical that the scientific method of hypothesis/data/theory?

The scientific method is neither rational nor irrational. It is simply a method. Whether or not it is a rational method depends on the problem.

Give a small boy a hammer, and he will find that everything he encounters needs pounding. ~Kaplan's Law of the Instrument

K.



farglebargle -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 5:31:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

what other process is more rational or more logical that the scientific method of hypothesis/data/theory?

The scientific method is neither rational nor irrational. It is simply a method. Whether or not it is a rational method depends on the problem.

Give a small boy a hammer, and he will find that everything he encounters needs pounding. ~Kaplan's Law of the Instrument

K.


I think that rationality -- the derivation of conclusions by considering things deliberately -- is integral to systematic observation, measurement and experiment and the formulation, testing and modification of hypothesis.

CERTAINLY there are other rational processes, but again, there is no other process which I think embodies the principle of rationality than the application of the scientific method.



slvemike4u -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 5:35:37 PM)

Anyone have any idea the number of threads that's devolve to what is going on here ?Anyone care to guess who is the common denominator in most of those instances? Does anyone here think anything will change regarding his style(or lack thereof),his substance(or lack thereof) or his contributions (or lac.....what the fuck you all get the point...lol).



Kirata -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 5:38:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Your stated hypothesis is: "for the most part leftists cannot argue logically".

You failed to provide ANY objective data supporting your hypothesis, and it has been held to be disproven.

Now you're just demonstrating your ignorance of the scientific method.

Repeatedly demanding "proof" of a proposition to which you object is not a logical argument against it. While lack of proof affords a reasonable basis on which to disbelieve a proposition, it accomplishes nothing to disprove it.

What you are doing is the opposite.

K.




slvemike4u -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 5:46:03 PM)

Is not the burden of proof on the one who suggests the proposition ?
Surely you are not suggesting that" leftists" now need to disprove sanities harebrained hypothesis/ observation...or whatever he is now claiming it to be.....I for one do not have the time nor the inclination to be bothered shooting down every whacky statement that twit makes.



Kirata -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 5:48:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Is not the burden of proof on the one who suggests the proposition ?

It is if he wants anybody to believe it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Surely you are not suggesting that" leftists" now need to disprove sanities harebrained hypothesis/ observation...or whatever he is now claiming it to be.....I for one do not have the time nor the inclination to be bothered shooting down every whacky statement that twit makes.

Did I suggest that? Or is that the only other option you can see.

K.



slvemike4u -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 5:53:30 PM)

It was sort of rhetorical...and a way to demonstrate the regard(or lack thereof) in which I hold sanity.....no offense towards you was intended.If it came across that way,I apologize .



Kirata -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/12/2011 6:17:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

It was sort of rhetorical...and a way to demonstrate the regard(or lack thereof) in which I hold sanity.....no offense towards you was intended.If it came across that way,I apologize .

What I intended to, umm, "suggest" was that garbage is better ignored than played in.

Particularly if your notion of playing is a bellyflop. [:D]

K.



Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875