RE: The Palin Emails (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


slvemike4u -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:47:11 AM)

Too true,as a matter of fact i owe you a letter soonest....at present though I am spending all of my time trying to come up with something,anything on point to add to this discussion.
No luck so far....perhaps I will just write the letter.....talk to you soon.




Lucylastic -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:47:55 AM)

it worked then




mnottertail -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 11:50:38 AM)

she did not use the nonword 'refudiate' that I've heard in her emails, perhaps she has spellcheck at her house.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 12:01:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: CruelNUnsual

What bullshit in this thread. Every idiot leftie here was drooling in anticipation of something to nail her with. DK must be so disappointed there isnt a fucking thing to take her down on with on "troopergate".


LMAO I dont even think DK has posted to this clusterfuck

SOCK PUPPET ALERT< LMAOOOOOOOOO I knew one was gonna turn up
where has ANYONE here in this thread " drooled" over anticipation of the emails, dont be a liar
Put up or shut up,



1. Just because you drool doesnt mean you have to post that you are drooling
2. There are only about 3000 Palin threads. You find them.
3. Learn what a sockpuppet is. You still dont know.




mnottertail -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 12:08:15 PM)

why dont you explain to her what a sockpuppet is,  like we had to explain to you how to spell ad hominem and what it means, in fact like we have to explain almost everything to you?




Lucylastic -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 12:09:08 PM)

awwwwwwwwww someone hurt your widdle feelings ???
i used sockpuppets term....
I said THIS thread for a reason
you go thru the 30 million threads and check..lazy git
Id like some proof please
Im english, I use the english definition A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception within an online community.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 12:12:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

awwwwwwwwww someone hurt your widdle feelings ???
i used sockpuppets term....
I said THIS thread for a reason
you go thru the 30 million threads and check..lazy git
Id like some proof please
Im english, I use the english definition A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception within an online community.




You are too insignificant to hurt anyones feelings, dear.

Correct definition. Note the words for purposes of deception. Never happened.

and a more complete definition is that the nature of the deception is to show support/agreement for another post. Never happened.




newOCsockpuppet -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 12:15:24 PM)

Hi.




thompsonx -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 12:28:01 PM)

quote:

Miss Coulters premise isnt that leftists are demonic. In her book she shows how mobs act demonic, and how leftists act like mobs (as in these continual frenzied attacks against Sarah Palin).


What you quaintly call continual frenzied attacks, rational people call pointing out her ignorance and ethical turpitude.




Lucylastic -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 12:47:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

awwwwwwwwww someone hurt your widdle feelings ???
i used sockpuppets term....
I said THIS thread for a reason
you go thru the 30 million threads and check..lazy git
Id like some proof please
Im english, I use the english definition A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception within an online community.




You are too insignificant to hurt anyones feelings, dear.

Correct definition. Note the words for purposes of deception. Never happened.

and a more complete definition is that the nature of the deception is to show support/agreement for another post. Never happened.



Apparently Im not, otherwise you wouldnt be so petulant and snarky
Using two identities, one for crossing TOS violations is not deception?
really?

why are your sockpuppets threads always nastier than your threads????
not deceptive?
in your case you are too easy to catch out




willbeurdaddy -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 12:52:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

awwwwwwwwww someone hurt your widdle feelings ???
i used sockpuppets term....
I said THIS thread for a reason
you go thru the 30 million threads and check..lazy git
Id like some proof please
Im english, I use the english definition A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception within an online community.




You are too insignificant to hurt anyones feelings, dear.

Correct definition. Note the words for purposes of deception. Never happened.

and a more complete definition is that the nature of the deception is to show support/agreement for another post. Never happened.



Apparently Im not, otherwise you wouldnt be so petulant and snarky
Using two identities, one for crossing TOS violations is not deception?
really?

why are your sockpuppets threads always nastier than your threads????
not deceptive?
in your case you are too easy to catch out



That is precisely why I clarified the nature of the deception. Nice try though.
And any difference in tone is in your imagination. I change computers without looking at where I last read an email and thats all there is to it.




Lucylastic -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 1:57:57 PM)

[8|]oh I believe you petal, truly I do[8|][sm=pigsfly.gif]
[sm=LMAO.gif]




thompsonx -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 2:02:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CruelNUnsual

Every idiot leftie


Is it your position that all on the left are idiots?




Sanity -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 2:05:19 PM)


I thought it would make you happy to see the first on topic post since then

Especially after the way you went on and on about how horrible these derails of yours and lucys are

/sarcasm

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Since no one else is posting anything on topic...


From Newsbusters:

quote:


NBC Most Excited by Palin’s E-Mail, Yet Fails to Dig Up Any ‘Bombshells’


Much of the media made fools of themselves with their excited obsession over the release of Sarah Palin’s gubernatorial e-mails, but NBC News went the furthest, sending, as did CNN, reporters to Juneau as the network uniquely led its Friday night newscast by hyping the non-news as a major event. “On the broadcast tonight,” anchor Lester Holt heralded, “mail call. Thousands of pages of e-mail from Sarah Palin's time as Governor. What we're learning about her tonight.”


Following a story from “national investigative correspondent” Michael Isikoff in which “MSNBC.com investigative reporter” Bill Dedman had the gall to complain “we waited longer for these records than Sarah Palin was Governor, almost a thousand days,” NBC’s David Gregory recognized, in an understatement: “As Mike and his team are finding, not a lot of bombshells here.”

ABC also got into the act, but didn’t send any on-air personnel to Juneau. On Saturday’s World News, however, John Berman trumpeted his big discovery proving Palin’s hypocrisy: “While these days Palin is criticizing parts of Michelle Obama’s national battle against obesity...she once e-mailed an aide asking for ‘low carb foods...just don’t want the kids to have too much sugar/white carb stuff.’” That should pretty much discredit her.


[image]http://www.newsbusters.org/sites/default/files/NBCNN-Isikoff-2011-06-10-240.jpg[/image]

CBS showed the best news judgment, not mentioning the Palin e-mails on Friday or Saturday’s CBS Evening News.


Isikoff’s find – Palin once praised something candidate Barack Obama said: “Among the e-mails, this exchange from Palin to an aide written a few weeks before she was picked by McCain, praising then-candidate Obama’s energy policy speech. ‘He gave a great speech this morning in Michigan – mentioned Alaska,’ adding, ‘we need to take advantage of this and write a statement saying he's right on.’ Then in a later e-mail telling an aide, ‘he did say ‘yay’ to our gas line. Pretty cool. Wrong candidate.’ Palin later became one of Obama's fiercest critics on energy policy.”


Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2011/06/13/nbc-most-excited-palin-s-e-mail-yet-fails-dig-any-bombshells#ixzz1PBGtIQTZ







This point was made by me on page three[8|]




farglebargle -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 2:09:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Yet another ad hominum

Who is ron

And I support my assertions well enough

Fun fact is that for the most part, the only assertions that leftists have to support are these constant ad hominums

Because they have no real on topic arguments

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

Stop while you are ahead, because Ron posted a few threads in which you could not support your assertions, I am sure there are many many many more such posts... In fact many times when you bash people for being leftists it it because you have no evidence of what you say.




You didn't support your assertion that "leftists can't participate in logical, rational discussions" at all!




Sanity -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 2:32:27 PM)


I wrote for "the most part", farglebargle.

You even quoted it.

And thanks to people like you and julia and lucy who keep proving out my assertion that leftists for the most part post only ad hominem attacks, I dont have to work hard at supporting it

You and they do it for me

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Yet another ad hominum

Who is ron

And I support my assertions well enough

Fun fact is that for the most part, the only assertions that leftists have to support are these constant ad hominums

Because they have no real on topic arguments

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

Stop while you are ahead, because Ron posted a few threads in which you could not support your assertions, I am sure there are many many many more such posts... In fact many times when you bash people for being leftists it it because you have no evidence of what you say.




You didn't support your assertion that "leftists can't participate in logical, rational discussions" at all!




slvemike4u -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 2:32:30 PM)

Wait a minute...we are actually awaiting him doing so?
WHY.....he has never,to my knowledge supported any other assertion regarding the group he assails as leftists.




Lucylastic -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 2:56:58 PM)

IM not Mike, ...The sarah palin of CM only has herself to blame.
I respect people like Firm, Rich, Fellow, Kirata, Orion, (gawd I know Im missing a couple, and wether they respect me or not is neither here nor there) I like FDD , and some less known ones like CD and Need... I like many republicans, righties, or even cons, and libertarians
You know on the relationship side its often said, if you(generic) cant have a decent relationship, It may not be the people you(generic) pick, it may you(generic) thats the issue.
That might be something to look into too. But im betting it will be "ignored" as a suggestion
shrugs




Kirata -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 2:57:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

I wrote for "the most part", farglebargle.

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

You didn't support your assertion that "leftists can't participate in logical, rational discussions" at all!

Yes you did. I had to go all the way to page 11, but I found it. And farglebargle is misquoting you. What you said was:

for the most part leftists cannot argue logically

However, I believe I have detected a flaw in your claim...

That they do not choose to bother trying to argue logically with you does not support a conclusion that they cannot. [:D]

K.






slvemike4u -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 3:08:23 PM)

Fuck you are a damm optimist.....lol




Page: <<   < prev  16 17 [18] 19 20   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875