RE: The Palin Emails (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

farglebargle -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 3:11:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I wrote for "the most part", farglebargle.

You even quoted it.

And thanks to people like you and julia and lucy who keep proving out my assertion that leftists for the most part post only ad hominem attacks, I dont have to work hard at supporting it

You and they do it for me

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Yet another ad hominum

Who is ron

And I support my assertions well enough

Fun fact is that for the most part, the only assertions that leftists have to support are these constant ad hominums

Because they have no real on topic arguments

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

Stop while you are ahead, because Ron posted a few threads in which you could not support your assertions, I am sure there are many many many more such posts... In fact many times when you bash people for being leftists it it because you have no evidence of what you say.




You didn't support your assertion that "leftists can't participate in logical, rational discussions" at all!



Of course I quoted it, I specifically asked you to quantify "For the most part". THAT IS WHAT YOU FAILED TO SUPPORT.

For example, is that 51%? 80%? 90%?

And from what objective peer-reviewed data do you derive this conclusion that "the most part" are incapable of rational debate?



farglebargle -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 3:14:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Wait a minute...we are actually awaiting him doing so?
WHY.....he has never,to my knowledge supported any other assertion regarding the group he assails as leftists.


Why yes, the solution to the problem of Sanity making these hyperbolic claims is to simply perform a rational and logical analysis of those claims, starting by asking for him to provide objective, peer-reviewed data to support his claims.

Ask for supporting information a few times, and without reply, you can safely consider the matter like a court does with any 'nolo contendere' case. Find the claim unsupported. Add one to the "Makes unsupported claims" column for him, and politely ask him to stop shitting all over the thread.




Sanity -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 3:28:59 PM)


Ow...

Ya got me.

[:D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Yes you did. I had to go all the way to page 11, but I found it. And farglebargle is misquoting you. What you said was:

for the most part leftists cannot argue logically

However, I believe I have detected a flaw in your claim...

That they do not choose to bother trying to argue logically with you does not support a conclusion that they cannot. [:D]

K.





Sanity -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 4:11:45 PM)


Sorry farg, but you are just laughable.

This isnt a place where people have to stoop to your (in my opinion) childish demands to "quantify precisely" or provide "objective peer-reviewed data" to support observations they may make.

The subsection is called Casual Banter for a reason...

Feel free to disagree all you want, but you might want to drop the petty banana republic tyrant routine, as youre acting ridiculous and nobody gives a shit about your wild ranting.

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Of course I quoted it, I specifically asked you to quantify "For the most part". THAT IS WHAT YOU FAILED TO SUPPORT.

For example, is that 51%? 80%? 90%?

And from what objective peer-reviewed data do you derive this conclusion that "the most part" are incapable of rational debate?



Moonhead -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 4:23:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Feel free to disagree all you want, but you might want to drop the petty banana republic tyrant routine, as youre acting ridiculous and nobody gives a shit about your wild ranting.

Projecting again, I see...



Politesub53 -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 4:43:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

The subsection is called Casual Banter for a reason.



Right I`m with you now. When you start name calling it`s "casual banter" When anyone does it in return, it`s the "beastly lefties being beastly to you"

And to use your own casual banter-ish quote :

"Feel free to disagree all you want, but you might want to drop the petty banana republic tyrant routine, as youre acting ridiculous and nobody gives a shit about your wild ranting. "

Really bro, its a two way street here.



Sanity -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 5:01:40 PM)


Where did you get that, "beastly lefties being beastly"  [:D]

Youre just making things up, because Ive never written anything of the sort.

In fact in my opinion most of you are not beastly at all, youre the exact opposite of that





Politesub53 -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 5:04:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Where did you get that, "beastly lefties being beastly"  [:D]

Youre just making things up, because Ive never written anything of the sort.

In fact in my opinion most of you are not beastly at all, youre the exact opposite of that



Lighten up bro. It was just casual banter [;)]



farglebargle -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 5:04:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Sorry farg, but you are just laughable.

This isnt a place where people have to stoop to your (in my opinion) childish demands to "quantify precisely" or provide "objective peer-reviewed data" to support observations they may make.

The subsection is called Casual Banter for a reason...

Feel free to disagree all you want, but you might want to drop the petty banana republic tyrant routine, as youre acting ridiculous and nobody gives a shit about your wild ranting.

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Of course I quoted it, I specifically asked you to quantify "For the most part". THAT IS WHAT YOU FAILED TO SUPPORT.

For example, is that 51%? 80%? 90%?

And from what objective peer-reviewed data do you derive this conclusion that "the most part" are incapable of rational debate?



If I wasn't personally insulted by your implication that I'm as amoral and corrupt as a banana republic tyrant, I would find it amusing that you consider application of The Scientific Method to your hyperbolic, inflammatory claims to be "childish demands"

And aside from the implications, you calling me a "petty banana republic tyrant" for pointing out that debate with you is basically impossible because you're calling names while I'm trying to have a rational discussion about your claims is perhaps the icing on the cake.

That handily disproves your tagline, too, from Ann Coulter, since you've been proven to engage in exactly the behaviour claimed for 'liberals' by calling me names instead of participating in Good Faith.

I'm not exactly sure of your goal shitting all over these threads, but whatever it is, you're doing it very poorly.



Sanity -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 5:49:39 PM)


Cant get much more casual here... [:)]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Lighten up bro. It was just casual banter [;)]



juliaoceania -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 6:02:27 PM)

quote:

And thanks to people like you and julia and lucy who keep proving out my assertion that leftists for the most part post only ad hominem attacks, I dont have to work hard at supporting it


Um, I hate to break it to you slugger, but I don't see it that way, and I am thinking there are a lot of other people around that don't either

I mean, I can sit here and claim the same thing about you, but the difference between us.. I can can show how you operate (and did).



juliaoceania -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 6:05:34 PM)

quote:

That handily disproves your tagline, too, from Ann Coulter, since you've been proven to engage in exactly the behaviour claimed for 'liberals' by calling me names instead of participating in Good Faith


The problem with people that go around insisting that everyone from one particular group does something (like present illogical arguments based upon emotion) is that you can't prove it, and it makes you exactly what you are railing against... someone who makes hyperbolic claims intended to argue to someone's emotions...

What we resist persists....



juliaoceania -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 6:06:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Where did you get that, "beastly lefties being beastly"  [:D]

Youre just making things up, because Ive never written anything of the sort.

In fact in my opinion most of you are not beastly at all, youre the exact opposite of that



Lighten up bro. It was just casual banter [;)]


Actually, I found examples of him insulting you as a lefty demon.... they are posted on this thread...[;)]



slvemike4u -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 6:18:39 PM)

Hoisted on his own petard....yet again.I'm really starting to feel sorry for ....aww shucks,who am I fooling lol.



Sanity -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 6:26:05 PM)


I didnt write "everyone" julia.

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

The problem with people that go around insisting that everyone from one particular group does something (like present illogical arguments based upon emotion) is that you can't prove it, and it makes you exactly what you are railing against... someone who makes hyperbolic claims intended to argue to someone's emotions...

What we resist persists....



Sanity -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 6:27:09 PM)


Thats a lie, I didnt call anyone a demon or a lefty demon

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania
Actually, I found examples of him insulting you as a lefty demon.... they are posted on this thread...[;)]




juliaoceania -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 6:29:29 PM)

quote:

I didnt write "everyone" julia.


You do not say "many leftists" or "some leftists" or a "vast majority of leftists" or "a few leftists"... nope, you just usually say "leftists"... which means all of them. It is a black and white statement... like mammals have hair, give life birth, and suckle their young... kinda statement.

Hint, one of the above statements is provable, the other, not.



slvemike4u -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 6:31:47 PM)

I hate multiple choice......I'm going with live birth and suckling their young.



Lucylastic -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 6:40:54 PM)

Im going with suckling



thompsonx -> RE: The Palin Emails (6/13/2011 6:43:19 PM)

I hate multiple choice......I'm going with live birth and suckling their young.

Perhaps you answer that way because you are a brain dead liberal who is incapable of rational thought and only capable of foaming at the mouth while calling people you disagree vile and disgusting names.
or:
You are correct.



Page: <<   < prev  16 17 18 [19] 20   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875