RE: moderation interpretation? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


HeatherMcLeather -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 5:53:10 PM)

Thank you!!! Yay!

Me doing my happy dance.





[image]local://upfiles/1214164/4916DD7409DF47689BDFF4185DCC34B1.gif[/image]




Aynne88 -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 8:26:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

quote:

It has nothing to do with "dirty words" but again, Arpig knew that.
Really? Seems to me she told you to block her after you had spent several post whining and bitching about the way she posted. And the thread was locked because after the thread had been derailed into discussing Hannah's use of profanity and speculation as to her character and the Mod had warned people to get back on topic, several posters ignored the warning and continued anyway. And you are continuing to whine about her language and speculate as to her character and psychological state on this thread.

It would appear that you are the one with the issues here. You say you don't mind profanity? Fine, I won't censor myself...grow a set of fucking balls and stop whining like a God damned 6 year old. Grow up! It's just words on the fucking Internet!

Oh and your picture is really nice. Just a little to yellowy to my eye, it doesn't really do you justice. I suggest you pink it up a little in Photoshop and it will reflect your beauty better.






Arpig. For the last time, I have none zero nada objection to profanity. I object to OP's of threads having fits when they get disagreed with and retort with shut the fuck up and block me then bitch.   That isn't the way it works here.

Oh and the "it's just words on the internet" argument? Come on Arpig, I have seen you positively apoplectic in P&R sometimes so that doesn't fly either, we all get pissed or irked or irritated by these little pixels because it's human nature. If not we wouldn't be here.

I also thing you are being way too dramatic with the character of psychological state comment. I just think she's angry, and it goes deep. Like a lot of other posters stated. It isn't exactly like she hides it for Christ sake. I don't have a personal issue with her, so let it go, really. It matters so little to me, and honestly when I saw the "fuckity fuck fuck fuck you all block me I'm right you all just don't GET IT" nature of her postings I should have given it a wide berth because the thread itself reeked of angst and I allowed myself to get pulled into it and in hindsight I wish I hadn't.

One of those things to learn from I guess. Arguing with that kind of anger is so pointless. My fault, not hers. Glad you know her in person and speak highly of her, perhaps her "real life" identity is less abrasive and somewhat off putting than what is portrayed here. Either way, it's not my concern.




LillyBoPeep -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 8:30:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88

Oh and the "it's just words on the internet" argument? Come on Arpig, I have seen you positively apoplectic in P&R sometimes so that doesn't fly either <snip>

i know, right?


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88
I also thing you are being way too dramatic <snip>


yep.




Aynne88 -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 8:33:34 PM)


Thanks Lilly. I hate people projecting their own shit on me when well..they are doing just that. It's all good. Let.it.go.

*mwah* pretty girl .






sexyred1 -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 8:41:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub

quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1

It would also be possible to construe your remark to me as an off topic personal attack, sexyred1. I would like to ask the mods to leave it in the thread, even if they see it as a tos violation, because I think it is an interesting example.
It could also been construed as being spot on.  That is, I think, what this thread is about.

We can all read something, and all see it differently.  Since the mods are, well, the mods, they have to make the judgement calls sometimes. 



Exactly.




sexyred1 -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 8:49:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: popularDemand

quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1

I agree with you about demographic retention. I don't know much about the message boards at either Alt or B. I still think the issue of thread content is central, and many people have already noted that change. I think BFA said it best: this site is currently just fun. Before it was both fun and meaty. That can be recreated, and it doesn't require getting David stein to post here. Imagine if someone said something off topic and ad hominem, and everyone knew that was wrong, just like black listing.


Is not this thread a demonstration of 'meaty'?
I for one have lost an incisor taking a bite, and trying to keep track.

pD


I agree. I am not sure how much more meaty it could get around here. After all, aren't many of the posters crying out about being tossed to the lions and how moderation is not protecting them?

I suppose they would find it more intellectually stimulating with more censorship.

The funny thing is that people SAY that they want meaty discussions, and when you have meaty discussions, they get lively, heated, passionate and erudite.

But yet they still complain. I always say be careful what you wish for.




juliaoceania -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 9:08:18 PM)

My experience is that what makes one group happy makes another unhappy, and if you change to make the second group happy, the first will become unhappy.. lesson? You can't please everyone.




Arpig -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 9:09:12 PM)

quote:

Arpig. For the last time, I have none zero nada objection to profanity. I object to OP's of threads having fits when they get disagreed with and retort with shut the fuck up and block me then bitch.   That isn't the way it works here.
That isn't what happened and you know it. The posts in question have all been pulled, but I read them, so your whitewash won't work with me. You can tell it to the marines, but the sailors won't believe it.

quote:

Come on Arpig, I have seen you positively apoplectic in P&R
Frustrated as Hell, sure, but hardly apoplectic. And taking my complaints to a whole new thread to bitch and lie about it there? I don't think so.

quote:

I don't have a personal issue with her, so let it go, really. It matters so little to me
Then why are you still bitching and moaning about it, and twisting the facts to make yourself look good? Those are hardly the actions of somebody who doesn't care. It's obvious to me that you care a great deal.

quote:

perhaps her "real life" identity is less abrasive and somewhat off putting than what is portrayed here.
Nope, she tones it down for you guys.

Edited to remove an unnecessary "s" (and an "I" as well).




LaTigresse -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 9:10:28 PM)

[:D]




Aynne88 -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 9:41:53 PM)

Arpig. You brought it up here, there and everywhere. Why are you obsessed with this? Now I am intrigued. Also, all you have to do is pull up any of my posts at random and they contain profanity. It's just how I talk. Not as frequently as Hannah, but still, I curse. For the last fucking time, it was her tone, her nuance, her mannerism, pick one, pick em all. I am not whitewashing a fucking thing guy, I was pissed at being told to shut the fuck up bitch and block me.  It.pissed.me.off. Get it?

Please stop following me around to espouse your love of H and H. I got it, k? You are really letting these internet words on a screen shake you up a bit for someone that says they don't.

LaT, I guess I miss the humor. I am way too tired after a 14 fucking hour bartending shift to go and sort through that thread to verify why I was pissed but I am wired up from coffee so I guess I could because I feel like I am in a creepy remake ofsingle white femal for fuck sake, except Arpig is the other character. .In 4 years on this forum we haven't had one word of contention and now I am being stalked over that stupid fucking thread because Arpig has totally and completely shut off his reasoning when it comes to H and H. Rapier Fuge was right I see. Not  the first time.




JstAnotherSub -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 9:48:26 PM)

Aynne, I had posts pulled on that thread that were to hannah and she had them pulled that were to me.  What cracks me up is she and I got over it, and found some common ground, but a few on here are still pissy that anyone dared to think she was anything but divine, when even she has admitted that she could have presented her case better.

As the collar turns....I now appreciate her, and hope for her to find her bliss, but I think a lot less of a couple of folks on here that I had always admired and respected.

Some days it just is what it is yanno.




juliaoceania -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 9:52:34 PM)


oh never mind




Aynne88 -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 10:01:06 PM)

quote:

but a few on here are still pissy that anyone dared to think she was anything but divine, when even she has admitted that she could have presented her case better.
quote:

ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub

Aynne, I had posts pulled on that thread that were to hannah and she had them pulled that were to me.  What cracks me up is she and I got over it, and found some common ground, but a few on here are still pissy that anyone dared to think she was anything but divine, when even she has admitted that she could have presented her case better.

As the collar turns....I now appreciate her, and hope for her to find her bliss, but I think a lot less of a couple of folks on here that I had always admired and respected.

Some days it just is what it is yanno.


/quote]

That. I do believe her ardent defenders are causing her more harm than good chasing us around this place and stirring it up or butting in when it's not their case to present, If there is anything I have gotten from hannah its she doesn't need or probably want the defense.  She's a smart young woman, but for someone like me I have dealt with too many of them, the angry ones, and I can't do it anymore. I don't give a fuck about saving virtual strangers or even contemplating the what and whys of it. I'm jaded, I'm over it, I am sure as the sun rises she will be fine, without Arpig tossing her an anchor all the time.
Hannah, believe me, there is no personal issue. You pissed me off. I thought you were rude, If the mods would like to declare that is wasn't me that reported the post or it was me, feel free, because it definitely wasn't me. I don't do that shit. I said to your "face" it was ignorant and uncalled for and violated TOS so that gave me carte blancheto behave in like.

Arpig are you as pissed at the males that really raked her over the coals or saving it all for me? Master of Holly, RF and a few others come to mind.  Not to mention the dozens of other women. It must be in the presentation [;)]. Either way, I'm done on this topic. It's creepy/ Isn't one of them like 18? Yeah not gonna go there, just because I find it distasteful,  This horse has been beaten to death Arpig. If you want to continue, PM me if you must but enough of it here, it's already fucking dull.




Arpig -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 10:03:08 PM)

quote:

Arpig. You brought it up here, there and everywhere. Why are you obsessed with this?
Actually I didn't. You did. In Post #114
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3729975
You said in reply to DesFIP:
quote:

Yep. I didn't dig today being called a bitch and told to "shut the fuck and block me then bitch". Yeah. Not cool. I mean if that is ok, then yay, I will take that as me being allowed to use the same language and not fear moderation. Cool.

Its been said before that lying on a forum that retains your posts is dumb, but lying about what you said or did in the same thread is even dumber.

quote:

I am not whitewashing a fucking thing guy, I was pissed at being told to shut the fuck up bitch and block me.  It.pissed.me.off. Get it?
What you are whitewashing is why you were told that.

quote:

Please stop following me around to espouse your love of H and H. I got it, k?
I'm not. I was arguing on this thread before you came along. I just replied to your post telling you to block her...you're the one who has continued to bitch about it. All I've done is either answer your questions, or point out the inconsistencies in what you posted.

quote:

now I am being stalked
Again with the drama. Nobody is stalking you. You posted on a thread I was already participating in, I replied and you went more or less ballistic. That hardly counts as stalking. You only have to not reply to me you know, but you keep on replying, and adding more lies to your tale.






Arpig -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 10:11:35 PM)

quote:

but a few on here are still pissy that anyone dared to think she was anything but divine
I am not worried what anybody thinks about her. I replied to Aynne's post where she first mentioned it telling her to just block the posts she finds too full of offensive language, and in her reply she misrepresented what had happened, so I called her on that. Since that point she has continued to reply to me, and continued to lie. So I'm calling her on that as well.

I would think it would be obvious that my bone of contention with Aynne has nothing to do with her opinion of Hannah, it is her deciet. She's lying. And I'm calling her on it. It's as simple as that.





Arpig -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 10:13:55 PM)

quote:

Arpig are you as pissed at the males that really raked her over the coals or saving it all for me?
All for you, babe. Because nobody else is bringing it up and lying about it.

I'm not trying to defend her, I'm calling you on your lies is all.




tazzygirl -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 10:41:42 PM)

Oh god! Where are my sunshades?!




tazzygirl -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 10:45:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Icarys

quote:

I got one on hide. Thanks for the heads up on that one, julia.

I'm proud of you both. [:D]



you think you are that special? please, grow up.


See? A perfect example of a post designed to do nothing more than bait... why give the person what they want, which is a response....



Because I was in pain and loopy on drugs. At least I have a medical excuse. [;)]




tazzygirl -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 10:54:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD


quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1

Hannah Lynn, you are objectively a draw. People click on threads because you post on them.


They do? Not true for me. No offense HannahLyn, it isn't personal. I find there is almost no one here whose name I see that prompts me to think "ooo, I have to see what so-and-so said". However, the reverse is true. If I see a certain poster has started a thread, I know that it's one I can pass on by. ;)


I have only one... well... ok.. two... Lucy and LadyPact. When they post, I just gotta see what hey are on about. Other than that... nope.




tazzygirl -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/19/2011 11:00:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

my threads are usually fluff, I admit.

LadyP is one whose threads I invariably read, even if I dont respond.

One persons 'content' is anothers fluff.. and despite whatever, sometimes they DO mix.

(sorry if that didnt make sense.. my pillows are screeching my nasme)


Ya know, Greedy... in my so not humble opinion on this subject... there is nothing wrong with a fluffer!

[;)]




Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875