mnottertail -> RE: "Hostilities" (6/21/2011 7:02:10 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic quote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/documents/united-states-activities-libya.html Check page 25 of the report, bottom of the first paragraph, Ron. He's defining 'hostilities" based on casualty risks, rather than combat objectives against the enemy. How the hell is trying to kill the king not hostile, Ron? Yeah, I see that on 25. I don't know how Obama is able to be defining combat objectives, Nato defines them. The idea was and always has been that the US is not in the lead role. Why arent you defining the combat role and taking it up to capitol hill? Same, same. You're not in charge of the prosecution of that war or whatever you wish to call it, and neither is he (the royal he, the US military). I would call killing the king a hostile act, who is killing a king where, in what country? Nevertheless, that is not the original cant, you said he said..........blah blah blah, which he didnt. But again, what is the combat objective in Iraq, and in Afghanistan?
|
|
|
|