Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: TPE and D/s


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: TPE and D/s Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: TPE and D/s - 6/23/2011 4:48:04 PM   
aromanholiday


Posts: 307
Joined: 4/12/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NuevaVida

quote:

ORIGINAL: aromanholiday
There were a lot more people interested in complete control relationships in the past; not so much now.



I ask, because there are a couple of groups on Fet I go to where live-in "total control" (M/s, O/p) relationships are expressed in abundance. More so than I've ever seen before - in local groups or online.


ETA: Apparently I've become Julia's echo here, lol.



Yeah, GMTA, it appears. I answered Julia on the general question (historical background of my opinion), but about those groups: I don't hang out on Fetlife, just pop in every once in a while to peek. I know about those groups and sometimes even read them, but even their discussions seem very watered down, far less to the point compared to discussions I used to see about M/s. I think maybe things are getting more confused and homogenized as more and more people get interested in BDSM and the various flavors within it.

I just don't see what I call M/s discussed much there or on Collarme, and when it is discussed, it tends to upset people and inflammatory words are used. That's fine with me, it's a minority interest anyway and always has been. I just find it interesting that peoples' interest in really being masters or really being slaves, and completely fulfilling the archetypes (or the historical examples) seems to be flagging as the overall group of people interested in BDSM grows. Again, trends in ideas and interests never go on forever, and this one may reverse someday, but I can't predict when or how that will happen.

_____________________________

"Isn't it odd how we misunderstand the hidden unity of kindness and cruelty?"

My profile is not turned off. It is broken and I am too lazy to make a new one.

(in reply to NuevaVida)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: TPE and D/s - 6/23/2011 5:31:12 PM   
agirl


Posts: 4530
Joined: 6/14/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: aromanholiday


quote:

ORIGINAL: NuevaVida

quote:

ORIGINAL: aromanholiday
There were a lot more people interested in complete control relationships in the past; not so much now.



I ask, because there are a couple of groups on Fet I go to where live-in "total control" (M/s, O/p) relationships are expressed in abundance. More so than I've ever seen before - in local groups or online.


ETA: Apparently I've become Julia's echo here, lol.



Yeah, GMTA, it appears. I answered Julia on the general question (historical background of my opinion), but about those groups: I don't hang out on Fetlife, just pop in every once in a while to peek. I know about those groups and sometimes even read them, but even their discussions seem very watered down, far less to the point compared to discussions I used to see about M/s. I think maybe things are getting more confused and homogenized as more and more people get interested in BDSM and the various flavors within it.

I just don't see what I call M/s discussed much there or on Collarme, and when it is discussed, it tends to upset people and inflammatory words are used. That's fine with me, it's a minority interest anyway and always has been. I just find it interesting that peoples' interest in really being masters or really being slaves, and completely fulfilling the archetypes (or the historical examples) seems to be flagging as the overall group of people interested in BDSM grows. Again, trends in ideas and interests never go on forever, and this one may reverse someday, but I can't predict when or how that will happen.


Yes, who would do this and completely fufill the archetype? I think you'll find that some of us (*holds hand up*).......just don't care. We have it all already.

We have been living it for years and years............. the reality of it is far more absorbing.

So what do YOU call M/s?

agirl



_____________________________

See how easy it can be?

(in reply to aromanholiday)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: TPE and D/s - 6/23/2011 6:52:52 PM   
CelticPrince


Posts: 3613
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

TPE, like the sub/slave things and IE is an endless whirlpool of hyperbole. I don't know whether Carol is a "slave", we do "TPE", or she's internally enslaved. What I do know is that I tell her to do stuff and she reliably does without either of us wondering about limits.


jeff,

What a clever lad yee be; you have TPE going and she is not aware of it............. might you work in DC?

CP

(in reply to leadership527)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: TPE and D/s - 6/24/2011 10:54:08 AM   
CelticPrince


Posts: 3613
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

In my opinion, TPE works only when both partners want something very similar. I don't believe anyone will accept TPE if, for example, that means working 100 hours a week at a task that you absolutely hate. Instead, what I think those who request TPE are asking for it someone who has basically the same desires and expectations as they do. They want to give up control in some areas of their life, but, I bet, they are not really willing to give up control all areas.

I view D/s as a general term that describes all degrees of power exchange. I think the dynamics of power exchange is based on the personality of both partners. To enter a relationship with set expectations is, I believe, setting your relationship up for failure.


Tristan,

And that may very well be the reason for the slow spiral that TPE has been in for a number of years. Thanks for your thoughts.

CP

(in reply to Tristan)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: TPE and D/s - 6/27/2011 11:30:54 AM   
aromanholiday


Posts: 307
Joined: 4/12/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: agirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: aromanholiday
I just don't see what I call M/s discussed much there or on Collarme, and when it is discussed, it tends to upset people and inflammatory words are used. That's fine with me, it's a minority interest anyway and always has been. I just find it interesting that peoples' interest in really being masters or really being slaves, and completely fulfilling the archetypes (or the historical examples) seems to be flagging as the overall group of people interested in BDSM grows. Again, trends in ideas and interests never go on forever, and this one may reverse someday, but I can't predict when or how that will happen.



Yes, who would do this and completely fufill the archetype? I think you'll find that some of us (*holds hand up*).......just don't care. We have it all already.

We have been living it for years and years............. the reality of it is far more absorbing.

So what do YOU call M/s?

agirl




I'm a bit confused by the wording of your first question ("Yes, who would do this and completely fulfill the archetype?") as you don't seem to be actually agreeing with anything I said, but I can certainly answer it.

As I said above, I believe that fulfilling the archetypes as completely as possible is the reality of the master-slave relationships I have had experience with and aspire to. Understanding the archetypes to their fullest and discussing them has always added depth and richness to my experience as a slave. I'm just not a "don't think it, just do it" type. It's never been my style--it creeps me out, in fact, to live an unexamined life. In the past, I've observed that those who don't ever think about mastery or slavery and "just do it" often end up doing something entirely different from what they claim to be doing. This ship doesn't steer itself. Constant slight but intelligent "course corrections" are always needed, and in order to do those correctly, you need, at very least, a polestar. An archetype (in the Jungian sense of that word, always) can be such a a polestar. A person who is the living embodiment of such an archetype is, of course, far more accurate. (Such people exist, obviously, or I wouldn't be mentioning them in this post.)

Additionally, I've found that thinking about what I do deeply enhances the experience for me. Not thinking about it causes me to not appreciate or even comprehend some of the most delightful nuances of my experience. I totally agree with you, reality can be utterly and (and sometimes quite mindlessly) absorbing; but I personally find that digesting that reality with contemplation and understanding to be sublime, like adding a delicious wine to your simple "meat-and-potatoes" meal. It's one of the things I enjoy most about living this way, and, over the decades, it has enhanced my understanding of past experiences and helped me to wisely choose future actions.

When you say "we have been living it for years and years," it tells me nothing. It's empty. No information, except perhaps the implication that you want to keep both your lifestyle and and your ideas about it extremely private. That's fine, to each his own. But, as this is a discussion board, I prefer, whenever the atmosphere isn't too hostile, to discuss with others what I have directly and specifically experienced in living the way I do and, even more, what I have learned from that experience.

What do _I_ call M/s? (grins at your "YOU"--my, my, I didn't realize I was that important to you, .)

As I believe I said earlier in this thread, I am on deadline, lol, and you just asked the ten-thousand-page essay question. I know you probably didn't mean it, but this question also implies that I haven't spoken out in great detail on this subject at least 20 times before (truthfully, I expect it's more like 120 times). If you are really interested, then all of it--aside from a few minor ideas I reserve as I don't really think will ever be ready for "Collarme Prime Time" (smile)--is in my brief posting history. I welcome anyone interested in what I call a master-slave relationship to have a thorough look at it.


_____________________________

"Isn't it odd how we misunderstand the hidden unity of kindness and cruelty?"

My profile is not turned off. It is broken and I am too lazy to make a new one.

(in reply to agirl)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: TPE and D/s - 6/27/2011 11:49:30 AM   
ControlImYours


Posts: 22
Joined: 6/5/2011
Status: offline
Over many years of this lifestyle, having gone from purely play, and then into a stronger D/s relationship, my submissive mentality has moved to TPE (or female led relationship as well) and control over me.

I have been in a short TPE/FLR relationship, which was unfortunately started online and was going to continue that way for some time. This I found to be most difficult as I felt that what was missing was actual physical presence and I found myself unable to continue with it in that way although the control over me, the rules and restrictions I had to follow put me into a submissive mindset i had not experienced before.

And yes I have found that there are fewer and fewer profiles on here looking for that, well at least on the Dominant side.

Who knows, when I finally get a chance to get out to munches and meet people maybe I will actually find someone :) we live in hope. Well I do!

(in reply to aromanholiday)
Profile   Post #: 66
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: TPE and D/s Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078