RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/7/2011 1:54:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

You have once again not read your link.


Are you denying that in late 96 (campaign season) and early 97 Clinton was selling oil out of the reserve, without replacing it, in order to make the budget numbers look better.


.

That is what the last 2 paragraphs of your link says.



Selling our emergency supplies for short term vote buying,

utterly disgusting....

I suppose my previously quoted post could be read to mean that Clinton emptied the reserves. drained (them dry). That is not what I am alledging


Yes I am denying just that (as Clintons motive) You might want to actually get some sort of fucking clue about that which you are so wrong about (everything) the 104th congress that passed the omibus act that was trying to make budget numbers look better, thru such artifices as selling off some strategic reserves was republican majority in house and senate, and they ordered the defense department et al to do so in that appropriations act. 

I do agree that the disgusting vote buying of our emergency supplies was done by republicans trying to destroy the country.

Glad you think it is disgusting and un-american of those republicans too, and you have just convinced everyone here of your agreement on that point. 




DomKen -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/7/2011 2:56:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

yet your "proof " contradicts what the QUITER says about it....

Nothing made up there....

No desires....



If its wrong its not proof.



Please show where anything in the above is wrong. If not it will be time to run away again.




luckydawg -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/7/2011 4:45:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

You have once again not read your link.


Are you denying that in late 96 (campaign season) and early 97 Clinton was selling oil out of the reserve, without replacing it, in order to make the budget numbers look better.


.

That is what the last 2 paragraphs of your link says.



Selling our emergency supplies for short term vote buying,

utterly disgusting....

I suppose my previously quoted post could be read to mean that Clinton emptied the reserves. drained (them dry). That is not what I am alledging


Yes I am denying just that (as Clintons motive) You might want to actually get some sort of fucking clue about that which you are so wrong about (everything) the 104th congress that passed the omibus act that was trying to make budget numbers look better, thru such artifices as selling off some strategic reserves was republican majority in house and senate, and they ordered the defense department et al to do so in that appropriations act. 

I do agree that the disgusting vote buying of our emergency supplies was done by republicans trying to destroy the country.

Glad you think it is disgusting and un-american of those republicans too, and you have just convinced everyone here of your agreement on that point. 



And as ususall, you are reduced to simply making stuff up.

It had nothing to do with the Omnibus act.

The congress doesn't order the DOD to do anything.

POTUS Does.

Though the Strategic Petro Reserve is part of the DOE.





luckydawg -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/7/2011 4:48:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

yet your "proof " contradicts what the QUITER says about it....

Nothing made up there....

No desires....



If its wrong its not proof.



Please show where anything in the above is wrong. If not it will be time to run away again.


???? nothing there is wrong.

Are you off your meds again?

and you are the one who runs away for a week or two, when caught making foolish assertions, such as there being "Proof" that THE QUITTER didn't take or send the pictures.




Hippiekinkster -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/8/2011 2:50:00 AM)

Here's what it would look like if the teabilly shitbagger ratwing pigfuckers got their way and "drill baby drill" without any of those pesky environmental protections were instituted.
http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2011/06/nigeria-the-cost-of-oil/100082/




luckydawg -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/8/2011 5:05:13 AM)

Nope, that is the result of your NIMBY.




Hillwilliam -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/8/2011 7:01:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

Nope, that is the result of your NIMBY.


Ummmmmmmmmmm dawg.  Oil wells arent exactly like a prison or a landfill.  You can locate them anywhere.

You kinda have to put an oil well where the oil is.




Hippiekinkster -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/8/2011 7:13:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

Nope, that is the result of your NIMBY.


Ummmmmmmmmmm dawg.  Oil wells arent exactly like a prison or a landfill.  You can locate them anywhere.

You kinda have to put an oil well where the oil is.
Well, ratwankers like dawg think all they gotta do is spud a well and crude comes gushin' out just like on that Horatio Alger morality play documentary "The Beverly Teabillies"




mnottertail -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/8/2011 7:31:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

You have once again not read your link.


Are you denying that in late 96 (campaign season) and early 97 Clinton was selling oil out of the reserve, without replacing it, in order to make the budget numbers look better.


.

That is what the last 2 paragraphs of your link says.



Selling our emergency supplies for short term vote buying,

utterly disgusting....

I suppose my previously quoted post could be read to mean that Clinton emptied the reserves. drained (them dry). That is not what I am alledging


Yes I am denying just that (as Clintons motive) You might want to actually get some sort of fucking clue about that which you are so wrong about (everything) the 104th congress that passed the omibus act that was trying to make budget numbers look better, thru such artifices as selling off some strategic reserves was republican majority in house and senate, and they ordered the defense department et al to do so in that appropriations act. 

I do agree that the disgusting vote buying of our emergency supplies was done by republicans trying to destroy the country.

Glad you think it is disgusting and un-american of those republicans too, and you have just convinced everyone here of your agreement on that point. 



And as ususall, you are reduced to simply making stuff up.

It had nothing to do with the Omnibus act.

The congress doesn't order the DOD to do anything.

POTUS Does.

Though the Strategic Petro Reserve is part of the DOE.



The third sale was directed by the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1997, enacted September 30, 1996, and called for the sale of $220 million worth of crude oil to offset fiscal year 1997 appropriations. On October 3, 1996, the Defense Fuel Supply Center issued a solicitation to prospective offerors requesting bids to purchase West Hackberry sour crude oil, and a small quantity of sweet crude oil in the pipeline connecting the West Hackberry site with the Sunoco Marine Terminal in Nederland, Texas. The first purchase contracts were awarded on October 24, 1996, and by December 5, 1996, the Defense Fuel Supply Center had awarded twenty contracts to seven companies for the purchase of 10.2 million barrels to yield about $220 million in revenue. The first delivery occurred on October 29, 1996 and all deliveries were completed by January 1997.



Can you hispeeka da anglaise????
This is proof of your pretending that the republicans are holy when they do repugnant shit, and your ignorant lies that you constantly spout.




DomKen -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/8/2011 9:01:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

yet your "proof " contradicts what the QUITER says about it....

Nothing made up there....

No desires....



If its wrong its not proof.



Please show where anything in the above is wrong. If not it will be time to run away again.


???? nothing there is wrong.

Are you off your meds again?

and you are the one who runs away for a week or two, when caught making foolish assertions, such as there being "Proof" that THE QUITTER didn't take or send the pictures.


I never ever wrote that Weiner did not send the photo, liar. What I did write was that there was evidence indicating the photo did not come from his blackberry which is the camera he had used previously when postingto yfrog which was 100% correct. I also posted that a vulnerability had been found in yfrog that would have allowed someone else to take control of his, or anyone elses, twitter account which was also 100% correct until yfrog shut down their servers and fixed the problem.

So as usual you are lying and attempting to derail a debate you know you can't even hold your own in. Now either get back on topic or run away liar.




luckydawg -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/8/2011 7:28:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

Nope, that is the result of your NIMBY.


Ummmmmmmmmmm dawg.  Oil wells arent exactly like a prison or a landfill.  You can locate them anywhere.

You kinda have to put an oil well where the oil is.

quote:

The third sale was directed by the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1997, enacted September 30, 1996, and called for the sale of $220 million worth of crude oil to offset fiscal year 1997 appropriations. On


And there is plenty of oil in the US where world class eenviromental laws would be followed, instead of a rat hole like Nigeria, where the people get screwed.

And those Jobs would be in America employing Americans, who would pay taxes, from good jobs. and our Balance of trade would be better than it is, by billions of dollars.

But you oppose that for some reason....




mnottertail -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/11/2011 5:32:53 AM)

Who opposes what, other than you opposing truth?

Only about one quarter of the US land leased for exploration to Big Oil in America is under the drill.  My father bought into a mineral rights lease in western North Dakota in 1948.  I now own part of that lease thru his estate.  (He owns, (or more precisely my siblings and I) own several more leases that as of yet are unexplored).

The lease that just activated recently is in the Bakken Fields, so I hope they suck it dry as the desert, and all you people drive hummvees.

Seems to me the Oil Companies cant get oil out of the ground they lease already with any speed, don't know why they gotta go into the water for it.

I support use it or lose it, as many of us good patriotic americans have an investment in our country, and should be rewarded for that.

You seem to be a socialist, wanting to take my money away and giving it to foreign corporations that want to have carte blanche to ruin the environment and take my money away, and not even follow the rules of the US government in doing so.

I do not support your communistic, un-american attitude whatsoever.  




Hillwilliam -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/11/2011 6:39:41 AM)

Damn radical environmentalists.  How DARE they cheat exxon/mobile out of a few billion dollars and prevent this. http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2011/06/nigeria-the-cost-of-oil/100082/




Page: <<   < prev  8 9 10 11 [12]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375