RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released

RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

DomKen -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/5/2011 9:19:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Ive been very patient with you and what Ive written throughout the thread is clear enough. If you and Hill are really unable to understand then you have my sympathy. quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen Clearly a fraud? Did you follow all the references to verify they all didn't say what the paper reported? Are you saying the wetlands didn't disappear? You claimed the entire paper is a fraud. The loss of wetlands is a fact http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=2816 http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3164/ If you had paid any attention to something besides FNC and drudge back after Katrina you would have learned that those missing wetlands used to protect New Orleans from hurricanes.

Hillwilliam -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/5/2011 9:25:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Again, I read the article, skimmed through it enough to understand that it is a hack job. Do you routinely eat feces offered up as caviar, Hill? That paper is bogus. Wallow in it to your hearts content, but you are crazy to insist everyone else do the same. "I didn't read all of it" "I read the article" "I skimmed it enough" As these three of your statements are mutually exclusive, at least 2 must be lies. Which 2 are lies sanity? Or, is it all 3? I am not supporting the article in My last posts. Once again, you are half-ass glancing at something and assuming you know wtf it is about. Just reposting because "Mr Patient" won't answer a direct question. Which is a lie?

Sanity -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/5/2011 4:52:27 PM)
Again, you and ken have my sympathy. I know youre incapable of understanding the simplest things but I will give you the benefit of the doubt and try to break it down as much as possible for you I read it but not thoroughly, meaning I skimmed through it Look the big words up or have someone explain them to you quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Again, I read the article, skimmed through it enough to understand that it is a hack job. Do you routinely eat feces offered up as caviar, Hill? That paper is bogus. Wallow in it to your hearts content, but you are crazy to insist everyone else do the same. "I didn't read all of it" "I read the article" "I skimmed it enough" As these three of your statements are mutually exclusive, at least 2 must be lies. Which 2 are lies sanity? Or, is it all 3? I am not supporting the article in My last posts. Once again, you are half-ass glancing at something and assuming you know wtf it is about. Just reposting because "Mr Patient" won't answer a direct question. Which is a lie?

Sanity -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/5/2011 4:55:31 PM)
I am so sorry for you ken, sorry you are incapable of understanding, but I have explained the problems with your college paper very plainly. That you dont get it is very sad, and I feel very embarrassed for you. You and Hill both have my deepest sympathy. quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Ive been very patient with you and what Ive written throughout the thread is clear enough. If you and Hill are really unable to understand then you have my sympathy. quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen Clearly a fraud? Did you follow all the references to verify they all didn't say what the paper reported? Are you saying the wetlands didn't disappear? You claimed the entire paper is a fraud. The loss of wetlands is a fact http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=2816 http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3164/ If you had paid any attention to something besides FNC and drudge back after Katrina you would have learned that those missing wetlands used to protect New Orleans from hurricanes.

Lucylastic -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/5/2011 5:09:08 PM)
Care to share what parts of the paper you found to be fraudulent, with page references and bad information??? with references to the correct information and peer assisted proof??? It should be easy if you read it...which parts in particular did you find incorrect and why? Did you download a copy?? could you link me to it please? so I can follow along?

DomKen -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/5/2011 8:52:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity I am so sorry for you ken, sorry you are incapable of understanding, but I have explained the problems with your college paper very plainly. That you dont get it is very sad, and I feel very embarrassed for you. You and Hill both have my deepest sympathy. quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Ive been very patient with you and what Ive written throughout the thread is clear enough. If you and Hill are really unable to understand then you have my sympathy. quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen Clearly a fraud? Did you follow all the references to verify they all didn't say what the paper reported? Are you saying the wetlands didn't disappear? You claimed the entire paper is a fraud. The loss of wetlands is a fact http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=2816 http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3164/ If you had paid any attention to something besides FNC and drudge back after Katrina you would have learned that those missing wetlands used to protect New Orleans from hurricanes. Once again you claimed the paper was a complete fraud. The links above prove the loss of wetlands is true therefore you are wrong. Would you care to even try to answer Lucy?

Hillwilliam -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/5/2011 10:05:49 PM)
He wont answer anyone. he will just continue to tapdance and contradict himself while he continues to let whatever right wing pundit is trendy this week cram a forearm up his ass and move his lips for him like Jeff Dunham and his puppets.

Lucylastic -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/6/2011 5:39:24 AM)
Well Im staying on topic or at least trying[;)], and looking for his debate on the subject of why its biased. I mean surely he would not say he has read it and really just relied on the people who trashed it for the info... Im not holding my breath. This is the second time in a week he has ignored my request for further debate. I seriously want to know what makes him think its biased, wrong and trash... specific points and facts... shouldnt be too hard if he understood it and can prove it. [:-]

Sanity -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/6/2011 6:33:08 AM)
I wont endlessly repeat myself for those who are too mentally challenged to understand them the first two or three times Ive gone over it, no. quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam He wont answer anyone. he will just continue to tapdance and contradict himself while he continues to let whatever right wing pundit is trendy this week cram a forearm up his ass and move his lips for him like Jeff Dunham and his puppets.

Lucylastic -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/6/2011 6:39:07 AM)
[image]http://fusible.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/chicken-shit.jpg[/image]

Sanity -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/6/2011 6:49:42 AM)
[image]http://communitiesonline.homestead.com/files/troll_2.jpg[/image]

Lucylastic -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/6/2011 6:58:23 AM)
you cant debate, you cant give information, I was on topic...you refused to come up with the information, you are [image]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_gGl0KkzXPyg/TTX5LbrP1dI/AAAAAAAAAUE/XoxXC6Tl8gg/s1600/chicken+shit.jpg[/image]

Hillwilliam -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/6/2011 8:19:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity [image]http://communitiesonline.homestead.com/files/troll_2.jpg[/image] Nice self portrait.

Sanity -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/6/2011 8:24:11 AM)
I wasnt aware that you drew that... [:D]

Hillwilliam -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/6/2011 8:29:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity I wasnt aware that you drew that... [:D] You chose it for youself. All it lacks is Glen Becks forearm up its ass moving its lips.

Sanity -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/6/2011 8:35:49 AM)
It represents your and lucys postings style rather well Hill Most leftists here, in fact quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity I wasnt aware that you drew that... [:D] You chose it for youself. All it lacks is Glen Becks forearm up its ass moving its lips.

Hillwilliam -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/6/2011 8:38:44 AM)
Awwwwwwwwwww GOODIE. Sanity is using the L word again. Seriously, sanity. you contradicted youself over and over. Which time were you lying? You havent answered it. All you do is whine "I already answered it". No you didn't. You have some lies to account for. You have hypocricy to account for. You claim a paper is fraudulent but give no reason other than a scientifically ignorant "cause I said so". Your ignorance, hypocricy, whining and lying and the Acme of Trollishness.

Lucylastic -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/6/2011 8:40:43 AM)
Now...I was on topic so was William and Ken, yet you didnt debate, you ignored, and obfuscated and now are deflecting or attempting to, badly. Its got nothing to do with left or right, its truth and lies... You are coming out of this as a liar. Simple, not rightist, not leftist, but lying

Sanity -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/6/2011 8:43:54 AM)
Again,.. I am sorry that you arent able to focus on, or recognize, or understand the reasons I gave Hill I am not sure what is wrong with your mind but you do have my deepest sympathy quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam Awwwwwwwwwww GOODIE. Sanity is using the L word again. Seriously, sanity. you contradicted youself over and over. Which time were you lying? You havent answered it. All you do is whine "I already answered it". No you didn't. You have some lies to account for. You have hypocricy to account for. You claim a paper is fraudulent but give no reason other than a scientifically ignorant "cause I said so". Your ignorance, hypocricy, whining and lying and the Acme of Trollishness.

Owner59 -> RE: 60 Million gallons of gas to be released (7/6/2011 8:49:34 AM)
It`s also easy to see the sanitizer`s interest isn`t on our energy or the countries well-being but on attacking the President. You can`t credit/blame the troll with the ideas tho,he`s just regurgitating what he reads,like a good little cult member.He`s really not sincere.

Page: << < prev 7 8 [9] 10 11 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.589844E-02