Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf!


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/15/2011 6:18:38 PM   
imperatrixx


Posts: 903
Joined: 3/29/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

First you realize the word "People" is a proper noun right?  That sentence is much more complicated than you realize and would take I would guess 3 to 4 pages of text to full analyze every jot and jittle to logically prove it all out.


Um...just out of curiosity why do you think it's a proper noun?

Please don't say "because it's capitalized" because that would make "Tranquility" a proper noun and "in Order to" a proper preposition.

quote:

Next you presume that the United States of America is a country rather than an association.


Mostly because the first part of the Constitution, detailing eligibility for public office, requires that the person be a citizen not a member.

quote:


I have no evidence that the word "People" applies to me,


Probably because you didn't write or vote on the Constitution.

The sentence, without all the clauses, says:

We the People of the United States [...] do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

I'm pretty sure they were referring to the people alive at that time, who were represented by the ones ordaining and establishing the Constitution.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/15/2011 6:23:37 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Thats where the We would fit in, no-- you (understood) is necessary. 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/15/2011 8:41:25 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

First you realize the word "People" is a proper noun right?  That sentence is much more complicated than you realize and would take I would guess 3 to 4 pages of text to full analyze every jot and jittle to logically prove it all out.


Um...just out of curiosity why do you think it's a proper noun?

Please don't say "because it's capitalized" because that would make "Tranquility" a proper noun and "in Order to" a proper preposition.

quote:

Next you presume that the United States of America is a country rather than an association.


Mostly because the first part of the Constitution, detailing eligibility for public office, requires that the person be a citizen not a member.

quote:


I have no evidence that the word "People" applies to me,


Probably because you didn't write or vote on the Constitution.

The sentence, without all the clauses, says:

We the People of the United States [...] do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

I'm pretty sure they were referring to the people alive at that time, who were represented by the ones ordaining and establishing the Constitution.


In a quick glance the cases of Justice and Tranquility they are basically both the "objects" of the action hence capable of becoming the head of each comma delimited phrase string and as an object it is not improper to capitalize it creating a proper name.

In the case of Ron with "People" the only way that can work the way you said it is if the word is people, not "People" as it was stated.  It should have been clear when you described it as a "class".

Then for citizen, a citizen before the Constitution and after are 2 entirely different ball games in as much as a citizen after the constitution versus a citizen after the 14th amendment again, now 3 different things, likewise after 1933, but that one is indirect and no entry was made on the constitution, the law just changed from public law to public policy without any knowledge of the people.

For People as a proper name or proper noun the connections are (with exception to certain special rules), for all intents and purposes connected the same way.  Often the object becomes the head of the phrase of clause.

This creates words/phrases with specific distinction and purpose.


quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx

We the People of the United States [...] do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

I'm pretty sure they were referring to the people alive at that time, who were represented by the ones ordaining and establishing the Constitution.


Well thats my read on it.   Though it seems the supreme court ruled the amendments, the bill of rights do not apply to the individual, but was a contract between the feds and the state.

All those words are capitalized.  "Life"  "Liberty"  "Property"  there in lies the problem.

It has always been taught as personal liberty, life etc.  Not a federal grant of liberty to the state who in turn via the federal government does full circle and out of graciousness extends it to me under force at the end of a barrel of a gun and a court system because it pays well drags people in with rights of Man abrogated and reduced privileges and immunities of State with lower status then those who came over before the damn revolution.

Total fraud and scam.

Simply a State cannot have posterity nor have the liberty to pick up its borders and go on vacation in France for a weekend.   So as I stated earlier there are several problems in Dodge!

nice punctuation on that btw.


< Message edited by Real0ne -- 7/15/2011 9:10:19 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to imperatrixx)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/15/2011 8:54:33 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

He was an anti-Federalist.


However, following the radicalism of the French Revolution Henry's views changed as he began to fear a similar fate could befall America and by the late 1790s, Henry was in support of the Federalist policies of Washington and Adams.

[Wikipedia]

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/15/2011 9:03:20 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

He was an anti-Federalist.


However, following the radicalism of the French Revolution Henry's views changed as he began to fear a similar fate could befall America and by the late 1790s, Henry was in support of the Federalist policies of Washington and Adams.

[Wikipedia]


that is the quick and dirty, being a statesman he basically went with the decision of congress even though he disagreed as did many people, like if Ron Paul does not make it throw support over to McSame.  no different.  Does not mean he changed his personal views.  Wiki tends to have nice slants on "stuff".


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/15/2011 11:31:46 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
"
"Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, Give me Liberty, or give me Death!""

Someone care to tell me why when I look a "peace" officers in the eye I don';t get arrested despite my being umder suspension, and having scores of warrants ? It's amoney game. I learned how to play.

They can go fuck themselves.

T^T

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/16/2011 6:24:13 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
In the case of Ron with "People" the only way that can work the way you said it is if the word is people, not "People" as it was stated.  It should have been clear when you described it as a "class".


It should have been clear to you that that is plainly ignorant and wrong.  There are mispellings in the constitution it's when its was what they were after  (common enough), there are words no longer spelled the way they are in the constitution, for example 'chuse' for choose, and the idea of the cap on the word People is from the Germanic custom, (which was not only done in germany (hint: there is no difference between germany and Germany, or English and english, People or people, State or state We or we in the law) to capitalize nouns (pro and proper) and still done today as in Sie, no matter where it occurs in the sentence.  So, if by your reckoning People is a mysterious mystical interpretation of some satanic fucking right of passage, then you will show me that law, or at the very least a clear supreme court decision that says capitalizing or making an entire word in the majescule changes its meaning from the miniscule under law.   

Look, if you are gonna fuck around with this words had different meanings 200 years ago and lecture on etymology and sentence construction, then get it fucking right, at least one time out of a hundred,  don't tinfoil and pudpound it so consistantly.

It means nothing beyond what you read plain and simply.  We the People of the United States.............  



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/16/2011 11:07:55 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
I gave you the rules and standing on a soap box screaming you are right and I am wrong without paramount rules is no different than claiming 5+2 = 52.

Do not pass go, do not collect 200 dollars.  plonk.

The problem you run into here is "WHO OR WHAT" were the States "presumably" representing "Themselves", the "people", the "People"?  WHO?

If they were representing the "Candid" "People" then the supreme court decision is in fact correct and we in fact do have 51 fully functional [as seen today] feudal sovereignty's, the 50 local sovereignty's all nicely tucked under the One "Foreign" Sovereignty [da big cheese] that the local sovereignty's allow to be "resident" on American soil.

If as a government you wanted to control a country as rulers and leaders rather than administer the "people's" business the Bill of Rights is the first thing that had to go!

This is purported to be officially correct punctuation, seems da guv  must have gotten a lot of flaq that they thought it prudent to state that on the site.

quote:

The Bill of Rights: A Transcription The Preamble to The Bill of Rights Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution. [Like tazering people busting down their doors and shooting them in their own home all those beneficint ends they do to people now days.]

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.
ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.
Note: The following text is a transcription of the first ten amendments to the Constitution in their original form. These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791, and form what is known as the "Bill of Rights."

Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; [<-common law of the land NOT the civil/commercial shit forced upon us by the 14th] nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State [so according to the supremie creamie pies the State then has the "Right" to demand a jury trial by jurors of the State that is on trial.  Way to fucking go creamie supremie Magoo youve done it again!  Yeh Bubba I want a jusry of my family to judge me too!] and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; [want to have fun go into court and demand to know the nature and cause of the accusation! LOL ] to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel [ that does not mean a BAR Fly either ] for his defence.

Amendment VII In Suits at common law, [sorry no can have, abolished!] where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.  [and that is why, they cannot fuck you with this in place]


Amendment VIII Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.  [Waterboarding?  How about 17yo, had one drink at a party and was fined 250 bucks for it. ]


Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people[NOT they no longer exist, they are all citizens now days, and they no longer have the authority to declare their rights as their rights have been converted by the 14th amendment to grants of permission by the States who own their vassal asses.]


Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Amendments 11-27

Note: The capitalization and punctuation in this version is from the enrolled original of the Joint Resolution of Congress proposing the Bill of Rights, which is on permanent display in the Rotunda of the National Archives Building, Washington, D.C.




As we can see here from the previously quoted SPIES case of the US Supreme Court:

quote:

It was contended, however, in argument, that, "though originally the first ten amendments were adopted as limitations on federal power, yet, in so far as they secure and recognize fundamental rights—common-law rights—of the man, they make them privileges and immunities of the man as a citizen of the United States, and cannot now be abridged by a state under the fourteenth amendment. In other words, while the ten amendments as limitations on power only apply to the federal government, and not to the states, yet in so far as they declare or recognize rights of persons, these rights are theirs, as citizens of the United States, and the fourteenth amendment as to such 'rights limits state power, as the ten amendments had limited federal power." It is also contended that the provision of the



I believe that I have sufficiently proven the treason perpetuated not only by the sitting judges of the time who made the initial rulings but by all judges who have perpetrated this fraud upon the "people" at large severally and individually.

One need look no further than grammatical and syntactic use to see the fraud.

Now we have judges determining elections in direct violation of the procedure set forth in the constitution!  Its nothing but a god damned piece of paper! 

It can be seen that the people in the form of a jury had the final say on the law as the united states and its subsidiary states have no jurisdiction to review the case.  NOPE! GONE!









< Message edited by Real0ne -- 7/16/2011 11:34:00 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/16/2011 12:27:40 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Nah, that is premier asswipe, but asswipe nonetheless. You are the one standing on a soapbox screaming that 5+2 =52.

If they were representing the "Candid" "People" then the supreme court decision is in fact correct and we in fact do have 51 fully functional [as seen today] feudal sovereignty's, the 50 local sovereignty's all nicely tucked under the One "Foreign" Sovereignty [da big cheese] that the local sovereignty's allow to be "resident" on American soil.

That is at least semi-literate, get right of the coinage asswipe out of there, and they dont allow da big cheese resident, it is the other way round. 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/16/2011 12:48:32 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
Continuing to ignore the rules only serves to make your points irrelevant.  Labeling it asswipe only proves you have no viable position much less a valid counter arguments.  


It should be obvious that the words used and what is going on around this country is NOT the same. 

I dont give a shit how many flags you have flying over your lawn.

Grammatically the Constitution and Bill of Rights is a document that lays out the organic law that is supposedly agreed upon by all parties adopted by the states as the attorneys for [as in representing] the people, not a contract between the states attorney's and the federal guv.

It clearly goes directly to the people and people is a word that devolves joint and several obligation of the parties thereof.

Think about it, we have supposedly the States who (adopted) this constitution that is supposed to be an agreement between them [as a collective] and the people and they create a fed government to be the judges as to the meaning of the document allegedly designed to protect party A the people and at the same time the reality is fuck party A "the people", party B the the state legislatures and party C the feds make ALL determinations what that document means shutting us out of the process completely.

Hell everyone would sign that contract right!

We have no say, now thats a fucking contract alrightee aint it!

Gimme a really fucking BIG pen! yeh bubah!

Since when does one party, party B no less have full control of a contract?   I would love to see any law any where in any venue/jurisdiction/manner that holds water but here in the US.

Oh wait we voted for them granting the that authority even though over 50% of the people are disenfranchised and do not vote at all!

Its complete control of the contract for both sides, just like all these gub agencys with their sub trusts and off book accounting et al investing the money they make from "we the *p*eople" whjile controlling the SEC et al, and the judges all have the retirements padded by CRIS accounts and cases sent up as derivatives to be traded on wall street. 

Its a big club and you aint in it! ~George Carlin "The American Dream" [because you have to be asleep to believe it]


What a fucking deal!   . 

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 7/16/2011 1:10:33 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/16/2011 1:06:07 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Does not mean he changed his personal views.


Not changing one's views over a lifetime would just be stupid and incredibly unobservant.

Your spin on things doesn't mean he didn't mean what he said when he changed his views either.

There are ideals. There is what works. Pat came to see the difference.

Kind of silly to suppose a once blatantly outspoken man suddenly become docile and compliant. But if he did...not so top shelf. Me...I respect the man, and trust he was speaking his truth, his entire life.





< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 7/16/2011 1:08:24 PM >

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/16/2011 1:27:05 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I gave you the rules (no, you didn't you got your dick in your hands)

[Grammatically (no)] the Constitution and Bill of Rights is a document that lays out the organic law that is supposedly agreed upon by all parties [(no)] adopted by the states as the attorneys for [as in representing] the people [(no)], not a contract between the states attorney's and the federal guv.

I tie my shoes.  Grammatically correct?  What the fuck are you on about?  Did Thomas Jefferson hold the Faculty Administrators Chair at Oxford for English?

No.
and your next problem, is:

the italics in your babbling jibberish could easily be replaced with the words, bag of cement.

You havent any premises that lead to those conclusions.

The sky is blue.
The sea is sometimes green.
A madman said that dogs can snorkle underwater.
Therefore the soveriegnty of the United States government flows from the states attorneys.

Those are your typical specious and illogical arguments because even your building blocks are inchoate and malformed.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 7/16/2011 1:38:15 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/16/2011 7:16:24 PM   
Anaxagoras


Posts: 3086
Joined: 5/9/2009
From: Eire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
The monarchy did not really abrogate any of their own power.   They just spread it out.

They lost almost all of them, and are now merely a figurehead. The fact that Britain has a democratic parliament in the first place is generally seen as proof of that by people who don't wear tinfoil on their heads...

Didn't the Queen invite Ted Heath to form a government in 1974 even though he got less seats than Labour?

Yes, but she was following the rules of Parliament. Labour had more seats than the Conservatives but not enough for overall control. As Heath was the existing Prime Minister he was asked to try and form a government (In consensus with any other party)  There was another election later that year, Labour had more seats than heath, but this time enough to form a majority government, albeit by just three seats.

Yeah you’re right about that. I had a look on line and it seems to be policy to invite the pre-existing prime-minister to form a government in the case of hung parliament. The strange thing is that when I read about what happened it was made to sound like the Queen has unduly significant power to simply be a figurehead. Largely the same point seemed the same on a BBC doc I saw a few years back!

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/17/2011 2:24:17 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I gave you the rules (no, you didn't you got your dick in your hands)

[Grammatically (no)] the Constitution and Bill of Rights is a document that lays out the organic law that is supposedly agreed upon by all parties [(no)] adopted by the states as the attorneys for [as in representing] the people [(no)], not a contract between the states attorney's and the federal guv.

I tie my shoes.  Grammatically correct?  What the fuck are you on about?  Did Thomas Jefferson hold the Faculty Administrators Chair at Oxford for English?

No.
and your next problem, is:

the italics in your babbling jibberish could easily be replaced with the words, bag of cement.

You havent any premises that lead to those conclusions.

The sky is blue.
The sea is sometimes green.
A madman said that dogs can snorkle underwater.
Therefore the soveriegnty of the United States government flows from the states attorneys.

Those are your typical specious and illogical arguments because even your building blocks are inchoate and malformed.


This saved me a post anyhow. It should be obvious to all the the reasons for capitalisations in the Constitution rest on the clerk capitalising All Nouns, a common habit in those days, as Ron stated.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/17/2011 2:30:10 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Yes, but she was following the rules of Parliament. Labour had more seats than the Conservatives but not enough for overall control. As Heath was the existing Prime Minister he was asked to try and form a government (In consensus with any other party)  There was another election later that year, Labour had more seats than heath, but this time enough to form a majority government, albeit by just three seats.

Yeah you’re right about that. I had a look on line and it seems to be policy to invite the pre-existing prime-minister to form a government in the case of hung parliament. The strange thing is that when I read about what happened it was made to sound like the Queen has unduly significant power to simply be a figurehead. Largely the same point seemed the same on a BBC doc I saw a few years back!


Much the same as people reading RO`s arguments and taking them as fact. It is easier to make something fit an argument than to look at the plain and simple truth. The Queen has limited powers in the UK and none in the US.

(in reply to Anaxagoras)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/17/2011 9:24:26 AM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I gave you the rules (no, you didn't you got your dick in your hands)

[Grammatically (no)] the Constitution and Bill of Rights is a document that lays out the organic law that is supposedly agreed upon by all parties [(no)] adopted by the states as the attorneys for [as in representing] the people [(no)], not a contract between the states attorney's and the federal guv.

I tie my shoes.  Grammatically correct?  What the fuck are you on about?  Did Thomas Jefferson hold the Faculty Administrators Chair at Oxford for English?

No.
and your next problem, is:

the italics in your babbling jibberish could easily be replaced with the words, bag of cement.

You havent any premises that lead to those conclusions.

The sky is blue.
The sea is sometimes green.
A madman said that dogs can snorkle underwater.
Therefore the soveriegnty of the United States government flows from the states attorneys.

Those are your typical specious and illogical arguments because even your building blocks are inchoate and malformed.


This saved me a post anyhow. It should be obvious to all the the reasons for capitalisations in the Constitution rest on the clerk capitalising All Nouns, a common habit in those days, as Ron stated.
Nouns are still capitalized in German.


_____________________________

"We are convinced that freedom w/o Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism w/o freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin

“Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” Reinhold Ne

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/17/2011 9:26:31 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
And in Dickinson's poems.

(in reply to Hippiekinkster)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/17/2011 12:09:20 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

Does not mean he changed his personal views.


Not changing one's views over a lifetime would just be stupid and incredibly unobservant.

Lets see, now when I was a child I determined that "murder is really bad".

I guess now that I am older I should change my views and its really good now.

What kind of looney road is that?

Is there a real point in there somewhere other than the obvious frivolous argument?


Your spin on things doesn't mean he didn't mean what he said when he changed his views either.

History is spin? 

Support your claim.  I have not seen anything ever, that would imply such a thing.  Adopting someone elses reasoning in a democratic effort is not the same as changing ones personal views.

PRECISELY where did he change his "views"?


There are ideals. There is what works. Pat came to see the difference.

There is no evidence what so ever that is the case.  Purely spin on your part.


Kind of silly to suppose a once blatantly outspoken man suddenly become docile and compliant. But if he did...not so top shelf. Me...I respect the man, and trust he was speaking his truth, his entire life.



I already explained to you that when operating as a democracy, you know the biggest gang wins, then you have 2 choices; either wage war against the other gang, or throw in your support of your new gubmint.

Now unless you have something that specifically shows otherwise, and I have no intention to scour the net looking for what you have at your fingertips, then post it.  Otherwise your whole position is frivolous.


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/17/2011 12:10:25 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

And in Dickinson's poems.


and dicker has what to do with the Constitution?


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! - 7/17/2011 12:15:36 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
That unlike the constitution, people can actually read her poems without being driven mad by boredom and believing all sorts of bizarre nonsense?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Patrick Henry is top shelf! Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.203