|
willbeurdaddy -> RE: Whistleblower wins case. (7/30/2011 3:29:14 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:
ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:
ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
It depends on what you mean by "doing contract enforcement", they are your words, not mine. My role was quite simple, a genius like you should have been able to figure it out instead of making a fool of yourself once again by making a baseless post.
An element of cost plus and cost plus with incentive contracts is the cost of wages and benefits. Pension and health benefit costs are reviewed by the initial contracting officer of the DCAA and by the DLA on audit. As the client's actuary I both determined what costs would go into the contract and represented them on audit.
You represented a defence contractor before the DOD on cost plus contracts and you're neither a lawyer nor a CPA? Bullshit. No one would hire an outside consultant for such a job when it is already the responsibility of counsel and their accountants. Once again you didn't have privilege so there is absolutely no way any company would give you access to such sensitive information.
Maybe you don't realize this but some of us have actually spent a lot of time around big business and your bullshit is simply unbelieveable.
No, your attempts at disputing the facts are what are unbelievable, CPAs and lawyers are not qualified to represent anyone on pension and health benefit cost calculations. they REQUIRE a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries and/or an Enrolled Actuary (both of which I was). Youre just an internet loser rationalizing your failure by trying to diminish others.
Bullshit. There is no such requirement. Pension and health cost calculations are standard parts of all good enterprise software (I know I wrote some of one). An enrolled actuary (i.e. federally licensed) is required for people who manage pension funds not for much of anything else and no company would give an outside consultant not bound by privilege access to the DoD contracting process.
Youre such a fucking idiot. To be included in contracts compliance with GASB and CAS 412 and 413 have to be certified to. Actuarial certifications can only be made by members of the Academy. Any time you want to go to the mat with this, lets go. $10,000 wager that from 1987 to 1997 I was
1) An enrolled actuary
2) A Fellow of the Society of Actuaries
3) A member of the American Academy of Actuaries
4) Represented Hughes Electronics wrt contract costs before the DCAA and DLA for qualified and non-qualified benefit plans
5) Represented Hughes Electronics in their negotiations for their sale to Raytheon, which centered around $5 billion in surplus pension assets
6) Represented EG&G Energy Measurement wrt to their government contracts
7) A partner in what was then the 2d largest and is now the largest actuarial consulting firm in the world
Put up or shut the fuck up. Youre a liar and havent the slightest idea what youre talking about.
Print this, read it, and then eat it.
http://www.actuary.org/qualstandards/qualif_stnds.pdf
"The American Academy of Actuaries (the Academy), through Precept 2 of its Code of
Professional Conduct, requires its members (1) to perform professional services only when they
are qualified to do so and (2) to meet applicable qualification standards .' Such professional
services may include the rendering of advice and recommendations or opinions based upon
actuarial considerations, including the issuance of Prescribed Statements of Actuarial Opinion
(PSAOs) . Actuaries who issue PSAOs when rendering professional services in the United States
are required by the Code of Professional Conduct, subject to the profession's disciplinary
process, to comply with the Qualification Standards .
A statement of actuarial opinion is a PSAO if, and only if, it is :
• a statement of actuarial opinion issued for purposes of compliance with law or
regulation ;
• a statement of actuarial opinion issued for purposes of compliance with Actuarial
Standards of Practice (ASOPs) ( including any Actuarial Compliance Guideline
(ACG)) as promulgated by the Actuarial Standards Board (ASB) ; or
• an actuarial communication issued for purposes of compliance with standards
promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the
Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), the Cost Accounting
Standards Board (CASB), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA), or the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB).A list of examples of actuarial opinions and communications commonly issued by actuaries,
You also apparently dont realize that communications with and/or by third party experts that are requested by an attorney in order to provide legal services are privileged.
"In U.S. v. Kovel, the attorney-client privilege was extended to communications with a
third party consultant for just this reason51 – because “the complexities of modern existence
prevent attorneys from effectively handling clients’ affairs without the help of others.”52 Since
this case was decided in 1961, there has been dramatic growth in the number of cases filed each
year, dollars spent on litigation,53 amount of regulation,54 number of governmental agencies,55
complexity of corporate laws,56 and number of media outlets.57"
|
|
|
|
